Optimizing e-Learning in CPD: Preferences and Perceptions of Health Professionals.

Anita Samuel,Ronald M Cervero,Beth King,Steven J Durning
{"title":"Optimizing e-Learning in CPD: Preferences and Perceptions of Health Professionals.","authors":"Anita Samuel,Ronald M Cervero,Beth King,Steven J Durning","doi":"10.1097/ceh.0000000000000570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nContinuing professional development for health professionals increasingly relies on e-learning. However, there is insufficient research into the instructional strategies health professionals prefer to engage with in e-learning. An empirical study was undertaken to answer the research question: What instructional strategies do learners prefer in e-learning modules to improve their learning experience?\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe Department of Health Professions Education at the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences developed six, stand-alone, self-paced modules for health professionals focusing on education and leadership. The module evaluation survey consisted of six Likert scale questions and two open-ended questions. Responses from these anonymized module evaluations from 2019 to 2022 were analyzed. Descriptive statistics for the Likert scale questions were calculated. Responses to the two open-ended questions were compiled and analyzed thematically.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAll survey respondents found the content of the modules helpful and met their stated learning objectives. A majority (94%) agreed or strongly agreed that readings and videos increased their knowledge in the topic area and that quizzes effectively strengthened their understanding of the topics. Four themes emerged from the qualitative data: pedagogical strategies, technology issues, feedback and interaction, and transfer of learning.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis study foregrounds the voice of the learner, which emphasizes health professionals' preference for instructional strategies that align with their needs as adult learners. The findings highlight the value of content relevance, expert creation, and authentic examples in enhancing learner satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":520110,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ceh.0000000000000570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Continuing professional development for health professionals increasingly relies on e-learning. However, there is insufficient research into the instructional strategies health professionals prefer to engage with in e-learning. An empirical study was undertaken to answer the research question: What instructional strategies do learners prefer in e-learning modules to improve their learning experience? METHODS The Department of Health Professions Education at the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences developed six, stand-alone, self-paced modules for health professionals focusing on education and leadership. The module evaluation survey consisted of six Likert scale questions and two open-ended questions. Responses from these anonymized module evaluations from 2019 to 2022 were analyzed. Descriptive statistics for the Likert scale questions were calculated. Responses to the two open-ended questions were compiled and analyzed thematically. RESULTS All survey respondents found the content of the modules helpful and met their stated learning objectives. A majority (94%) agreed or strongly agreed that readings and videos increased their knowledge in the topic area and that quizzes effectively strengthened their understanding of the topics. Four themes emerged from the qualitative data: pedagogical strategies, technology issues, feedback and interaction, and transfer of learning. CONCLUSIONS This study foregrounds the voice of the learner, which emphasizes health professionals' preference for instructional strategies that align with their needs as adult learners. The findings highlight the value of content relevance, expert creation, and authentic examples in enhancing learner satisfaction.
优化持续专业发展中的电子学习:卫生专业人员的偏好和看法。
引言 保健专业人员的持续专业发展越来越依赖于电子学习。然而,对卫生专业人员在电子学习中偏好使用的教学策略研究不足。为了回答研究问题,我们开展了一项实证研究:在电子学习模块中,学习者喜欢采用哪些教学策略来改善他们的学习体验? 方法美国卫生科学统一服务大学卫生专业教育系为卫生专业人员开发了六个独立的自定进度模块,重点是教育和领导力。模块评估调查包括六个李克特量表问题和两个开放式问题。我们对 2019 年至 2022 年期间这些匿名模块评估的回复进行了分析。计算了李克特量表问题的描述性统计。对两个开放式问题的回复进行了汇编和专题分析。结果所有调查回复者都认为模块内容很有帮助,达到了既定的学习目标。大多数人(94%)同意或非常同意阅读和视频增加了他们在主题领域的知识,测验有效地加强了他们对主题的理解。定性数据中出现了四个主题:教学策略、技术问题、反馈和互动以及学习迁移。研究结果强调了内容相关性、专家创作和真实案例在提高学习者满意度方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信