Martina Formichetti, Dea D. Wangsawijaya, Sean Symon, Bharathram Ganapathisubramani
{"title":"Effects of fetch length on turbulent boundary layer recovery past a step-change in surface roughness","authors":"Martina Formichetti, Dea D. Wangsawijaya, Sean Symon, Bharathram Ganapathisubramani","doi":"arxiv-2409.02082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent studies focusing on the response of turbulent boundary layers (TBL) to\na step-change in roughness have provided insight into the scaling and\ncharacterisation of TBLs and the development of the internal layer. Although\nvarious step-change combinations have been investigated, ranging from\nsmooth-to-rough to rough-to-smooth, the \"minimum\" required roughness fetch\nlength over which the TBL returns to its homogeneously rough behaviour remains\nunclear. Moreover, the relationship between a finite- and infinite-fetch\nroughness function (and the equivalent sandgrain roughness) is also unknown. In\nthis study, we determine the minimum \"equilibrium fetch length\" for TBL\ndeveloping over a smooth-to-rough step-change as well as the expected error in\nlocal skin friction if the fetch length is under this minimum threshold. An\nexperimental study is carried out where the flow is initially developed over a\nsmooth wall, and then a step-change is introduced using patches of P24\nsandpaper. 12 roughness fetch lengths are tested in this study, systematically\nincreasing from $L = 1\\delta_2$ up to $L = 39\\delta_2$ (where \\textit{L} is the\nroughness fetch length and $\\delta_2$ is the TBL thickness of the longest fetch\ncase), measured over a range of Reynolds numbers ($4\\cdot10^2 \\leq Re_\\tau \\leq\n2\\cdot10^5$). Results show that the minimum fetch length needed to achieve full\nequilibrium recovery is around $20\\delta_2$. Furthermore, we observe that $C_f$\nrecovers to within 10\\% of its recovered value for fetch lengths $\\geq\n5\\delta_2$. This information allows us to incorporate the effects of roughness\nfetch length on the skin friction and roughness function.","PeriodicalId":501125,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Fluid Dynamics","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Fluid Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.02082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent studies focusing on the response of turbulent boundary layers (TBL) to
a step-change in roughness have provided insight into the scaling and
characterisation of TBLs and the development of the internal layer. Although
various step-change combinations have been investigated, ranging from
smooth-to-rough to rough-to-smooth, the "minimum" required roughness fetch
length over which the TBL returns to its homogeneously rough behaviour remains
unclear. Moreover, the relationship between a finite- and infinite-fetch
roughness function (and the equivalent sandgrain roughness) is also unknown. In
this study, we determine the minimum "equilibrium fetch length" for TBL
developing over a smooth-to-rough step-change as well as the expected error in
local skin friction if the fetch length is under this minimum threshold. An
experimental study is carried out where the flow is initially developed over a
smooth wall, and then a step-change is introduced using patches of P24
sandpaper. 12 roughness fetch lengths are tested in this study, systematically
increasing from $L = 1\delta_2$ up to $L = 39\delta_2$ (where \textit{L} is the
roughness fetch length and $\delta_2$ is the TBL thickness of the longest fetch
case), measured over a range of Reynolds numbers ($4\cdot10^2 \leq Re_\tau \leq
2\cdot10^5$). Results show that the minimum fetch length needed to achieve full
equilibrium recovery is around $20\delta_2$. Furthermore, we observe that $C_f$
recovers to within 10\% of its recovered value for fetch lengths $\geq
5\delta_2$. This information allows us to incorporate the effects of roughness
fetch length on the skin friction and roughness function.