Quantum panprotopsychism and the structure and subject-summing combination problem

Rodolfo Gambini, Jorge Pullin
{"title":"Quantum panprotopsychism and the structure and subject-summing combination problem","authors":"Rodolfo Gambini, Jorge Pullin","doi":"arxiv-2409.01368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a previous paper, we have shown that an ontology of quantum mechanics in\nterms of states and events with internal phenomenal aspects, that is, a form of\npanprotopsychism, is well suited to explaining the phenomenal aspects of\nconsciousness. We have proved there that the palette and grain combination\nproblems of panpsychism and panprotopsychism arise from implicit hypotheses\nbased on classical physics about supervenience that are inappropriate at the\nquantum level, where an exponential number of emergent properties and states\narise. In this article, we address what is probably the first and most\nimportant combination problem of panpsychism: the subject-summing problem\noriginally posed by William James. We begin by identifying the physical\ncounterparts of the subjects of experience within the quantum panprotopsychic\napproach presented in that article. To achieve this, we turn to the notion of\nsubject of experience inspired by the idea of prehension proposed by Whitehead\nand show that this notion can be adapted to the quantum ontology of objects and\nevents. Due to the indeterminacy of quantum mechanics and its causal openness,\nthis ontology also seems to be suitable for the analysis of the remaining\naspects of the structure combination problem, which shows how the structuration\nof consciousness could have evolved from primitive animals to humans. The\nanalysis imposes conditions on possible implementations of quantum cognition\nmechanisms in the brain and suggests new problems and strategies to address\nthem. In particular, with regard to the structuring of experiences in animals\nwith different degrees of evolutionary development.","PeriodicalId":501517,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Neurons and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Neurons and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.01368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a previous paper, we have shown that an ontology of quantum mechanics in terms of states and events with internal phenomenal aspects, that is, a form of panprotopsychism, is well suited to explaining the phenomenal aspects of consciousness. We have proved there that the palette and grain combination problems of panpsychism and panprotopsychism arise from implicit hypotheses based on classical physics about supervenience that are inappropriate at the quantum level, where an exponential number of emergent properties and states arise. In this article, we address what is probably the first and most important combination problem of panpsychism: the subject-summing problem originally posed by William James. We begin by identifying the physical counterparts of the subjects of experience within the quantum panprotopsychic approach presented in that article. To achieve this, we turn to the notion of subject of experience inspired by the idea of prehension proposed by Whitehead and show that this notion can be adapted to the quantum ontology of objects and events. Due to the indeterminacy of quantum mechanics and its causal openness, this ontology also seems to be suitable for the analysis of the remaining aspects of the structure combination problem, which shows how the structuration of consciousness could have evolved from primitive animals to humans. The analysis imposes conditions on possible implementations of quantum cognition mechanisms in the brain and suggests new problems and strategies to address them. In particular, with regard to the structuring of experiences in animals with different degrees of evolutionary development.
量子泛超心理学与结构和主体和组合问题
在之前的一篇论文中,我们已经证明,量子力学关于具有内在现象层面的状态和事件的本体论,也就是泛超心理学的一种形式,非常适合解释意识的现象层面。我们在那里证明,泛心理学和泛超心理学的调色板和谷物组合问题源于基于经典物理学的关于超验性的隐含假设,而这些假设在量子层面是不合适的,因为在量子层面会出现指数数量的突现属性和状态。在本文中,我们要讨论的可能是泛灵论的第一个也是最重要的组合问题:最初由威廉-詹姆斯(William James)提出的主体-总和问题。我们首先要在该文提出的量子泛灵论方法中确定经验主体的物理对应物。为了实现这一目标,我们从怀特海提出的 "预言"(phension)思想中得到启发,转向经验主体的概念,并证明这一概念可以适用于对象和事件的量子本体论。由于量子力学的不确定性及其因果关系的开放性,这一本体论似乎也适用于分析结构组合问题的其余方面,该问题显示了意识的结构化如何从原始动物进化到人类。分析对量子认知机制在大脑中的可能实现提出了条件,并提出了解决这些问题的新问题和策略。特别是关于进化程度不同的动物的经验结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信