Margaret Mead: Early childhood and local expertise in Indonesia

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jan Newberry
{"title":"Margaret Mead: Early childhood and local expertise in Indonesia","authors":"Jan Newberry","doi":"10.1177/14782103241281001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Margaret Mead shaped the field of childhood studies in anthropology in the early 20th century. One of her concerns was the challenge posed to the continuity of childcare from rapid social change in the 1940s and 1960s in the United States. Her interest in the contrast between slowly changing homogenous cultures and those undergoing rapid change developed into a one between independent and interdependent training of children. Yet, Mead was much more concerned with the social institutions that support continuity in enculturation than a binary contrast. Mead’s own expertise and her attention to the local expertise of women and mothers is juxtaposed with recent scholarly work on the production of expertise as a form of knowledge. Interest in local forms of women’s knowledge associated with ethnomethodology and feminist standpoint theory seems to have gone missing. Dramatic social change in Indonesia since the late 1990s has corresponded with a realignment of expertise in the era of democratic reform, highlighting the tension between local and globalized forms of knowledge around early childhood education and care (ECEC). Based on long-term ethnographic research in central Java, I argue that existing forms of governmentality offer the possibility for recognizing and redistributing the local expertise of neighborhood women and mothers as a balance to globalized programs for ECEC.","PeriodicalId":46984,"journal":{"name":"Policy Futures in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Futures in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103241281001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Margaret Mead shaped the field of childhood studies in anthropology in the early 20th century. One of her concerns was the challenge posed to the continuity of childcare from rapid social change in the 1940s and 1960s in the United States. Her interest in the contrast between slowly changing homogenous cultures and those undergoing rapid change developed into a one between independent and interdependent training of children. Yet, Mead was much more concerned with the social institutions that support continuity in enculturation than a binary contrast. Mead’s own expertise and her attention to the local expertise of women and mothers is juxtaposed with recent scholarly work on the production of expertise as a form of knowledge. Interest in local forms of women’s knowledge associated with ethnomethodology and feminist standpoint theory seems to have gone missing. Dramatic social change in Indonesia since the late 1990s has corresponded with a realignment of expertise in the era of democratic reform, highlighting the tension between local and globalized forms of knowledge around early childhood education and care (ECEC). Based on long-term ethnographic research in central Java, I argue that existing forms of governmentality offer the possibility for recognizing and redistributing the local expertise of neighborhood women and mothers as a balance to globalized programs for ECEC.
玛格丽特-米德印度尼西亚的幼儿教育和当地专门知识
玛格丽特-米德在 20 世纪初开创了人类学中的童年研究领域。她关注的问题之一是 20 世纪 40 年代和 60 年代美国社会的快速变革对儿童保育的连续性提出的挑战。她对缓慢变化的同质文化与快速变化的文化之间的对比产生了兴趣,并将其发展为儿童独立训练与相互依存训练之间的对比。然而,与二元对比相比,米德更关注的是支持文化连续性的社会制度。米德自身的专业知识以及她对妇女和母亲的地方专业知识的关注,与近期学术界对作为一种知识形式的专业知识的产生的研究并列。与民族方法论和女性主义立场理论相关的对当地妇女知识形式的兴趣似乎已经消失。印度尼西亚自 20 世纪 90 年代末以来发生了翻天覆地的社会变革,与之相对应的是民主改革时代专业知识的重新调整,凸显了围绕幼儿教育和保育(ECEC)的本地知识和全球化知识形式之间的紧张关系。根据在爪哇岛中部进行的长期人种学研究,我认为现有的政府形式为认可和重新分配邻里妇女和母亲的本地专业知识提供了可能性,从而平衡了全球化的幼儿教育和保育计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Policy Futures in Education
Policy Futures in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信