Practising Resilience: Lived Experience, Agency and Responses to the Cost‐of‐Living Crisis

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Kirstie Hewlett, Rod Dacombe, Tianne Haggar, Hannah Piggott, Marta Wojciechowska, Suzanne Hall
{"title":"Practising Resilience: Lived Experience, Agency and Responses to the Cost‐of‐Living Crisis","authors":"Kirstie Hewlett, Rod Dacombe, Tianne Haggar, Hannah Piggott, Marta Wojciechowska, Suzanne Hall","doi":"10.1111/spol.13079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cost of living in the United Kingdom has risen to unprecedented levels, leaving people experiencing intensifying hardship. However, there is a tension between the ways in which the cost‐of‐living crisis has been framed in public discourse and the experiences of the public, who focus less on coping with short‐term shocks and more on the erosion of personal resilience over the long term. To explore how resilience has been practised during the crisis and the types of policy change people want to see, this article draws on findings from a mixed‐methods study, taking in a longitudinal survey fielded in Britain in 2022–2023, alongside findings from deliberative workshops and peer research conducted in three London boroughs. Our contribution is both theoretical, connecting lived experience to the existing literature on resilience, and empirical, through the application of novel methods to policy responses to hardship. Using Item Response Theory, supported by insights from peer research and deliberative workshops, we identify the differential nature of the strategies people are taking to cope with rising costs. We then consider the types of policy changes people would like to see, finding far greater appetite for long‐term, ambitious systemic reform to rebuild resilience, not short‐term measures to weather the peaks of inflation. Our findings suggest a distrust in those with the power to enact change as well as stigma around accessing support, while also highlighting the need for engaging the most vulnerable in the process.","PeriodicalId":47858,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy & Administration","volume":"264 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy & Administration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.13079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cost of living in the United Kingdom has risen to unprecedented levels, leaving people experiencing intensifying hardship. However, there is a tension between the ways in which the cost‐of‐living crisis has been framed in public discourse and the experiences of the public, who focus less on coping with short‐term shocks and more on the erosion of personal resilience over the long term. To explore how resilience has been practised during the crisis and the types of policy change people want to see, this article draws on findings from a mixed‐methods study, taking in a longitudinal survey fielded in Britain in 2022–2023, alongside findings from deliberative workshops and peer research conducted in three London boroughs. Our contribution is both theoretical, connecting lived experience to the existing literature on resilience, and empirical, through the application of novel methods to policy responses to hardship. Using Item Response Theory, supported by insights from peer research and deliberative workshops, we identify the differential nature of the strategies people are taking to cope with rising costs. We then consider the types of policy changes people would like to see, finding far greater appetite for long‐term, ambitious systemic reform to rebuild resilience, not short‐term measures to weather the peaks of inflation. Our findings suggest a distrust in those with the power to enact change as well as stigma around accessing support, while also highlighting the need for engaging the most vulnerable in the process.
实践复原力:生活费用危机的生活经验、机构和应对措施
联合王国的生活费用已上升到前所未有的水平,使人们的生活更加艰难。然而,生活费用危机在公共讨论中的表述方式与公众的经历之间存在着矛盾,公众并不关注如何应对短期冲击,而是更关注个人抗压能力的长期削弱。为了探讨在危机期间人们是如何提高抗灾能力的,以及人们希望看到哪些类型的政策变化,本文借鉴了一项混合方法研究的结果,其中包括 2022-2023 年在英国开展的一项纵向调查,以及在伦敦三个区开展的商议研讨会和同行研究的结果。我们的贡献既有理论方面的,将生活经验与现有的抗逆力文献联系起来;也有经验方面的,将新方法应用于应对困难的政策。利用项目反应理论,并辅以从同伴研究和商议研讨会中获得的见解,我们确定了人们为应对成本上升而采取的策略的不同性质。然后,我们考虑了人们希望看到的政策变化类型,发现人们更希望看到长期、雄心勃勃的系统性改革来重建复原力,而不是采取短期措施来抵御通胀高峰。我们的研究结果表明,人们不信任那些有能力实施变革的人,也不信任那些因获得支持而蒙受耻辱的人,同时还强调了让最弱势群体参与到这一进程中的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Social Policy & Administration is the longest established journal in its field. Whilst remaining faithful to its tradition in academic excellence, the journal also seeks to engender debate about topical and controversial issues. Typical numbers contain papers clustered around a theme. The journal is international in scope. Quality contributions are received from scholars world-wide and cover social policy issues not only in Europe but in the USA, Canada, Australia and Asia Pacific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信