Democratizing biomedical simulation through automated model discovery and a universal material subroutine

IF 3.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Mathias Peirlinck, Kevin Linka, Juan A. Hurtado, Gerhard A. Holzapfel, Ellen Kuhl
{"title":"Democratizing biomedical simulation through automated model discovery and a universal material subroutine","authors":"Mathias Peirlinck, Kevin Linka, Juan A. Hurtado, Gerhard A. Holzapfel, Ellen Kuhl","doi":"10.1007/s00466-024-02515-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Personalized computational simulations have emerged as a vital tool to understand the biomechanical factors of a disease, predict disease progression, and design personalized intervention. Material modeling is critical for realistic biomedical simulations, and poor model selection can have life-threatening consequences for the patient. However, selecting the best model requires a profound domain knowledge and is limited to a few highly specialized experts in the field. Here we explore the feasibility of eliminating user involvement and automate the process of material modeling in finite element analyses. We leverage recent developments in constitutive neural networks, machine learning, and artificial intelligence to discover the best constitutive model from thousands of possible combinations of a few functional building blocks. We integrate all discoverable models into the finite element workflow by creating a universal material subroutine that contains more than 60,000 models, made up of 16 individual terms. We prototype this workflow using biaxial extension tests from healthy human arteries as input and stress and stretch profiles across the human aortic arch as output. Our results suggest that constitutive neural networks can robustly discover various flavors of arterial models from data, feed these models directly into a finite element simulation, and predict stress and strain profiles that compare favorably to the classical Holzapfel model. Replacing dozens of individual material subroutines by a single universal material subroutine—populated directly via automated model discovery—will make finite element simulations more user-friendly, more robust, and less vulnerable to human error. Democratizing finite element simulation by automating model selection could induce a paradigm shift in physics-based modeling, broaden access to simulation technologies, and empower individuals with varying levels of expertise and diverse backgrounds to actively participate in scientific discovery and push the boundaries of biomedical simulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55248,"journal":{"name":"Computational Mechanics","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-024-02515-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personalized computational simulations have emerged as a vital tool to understand the biomechanical factors of a disease, predict disease progression, and design personalized intervention. Material modeling is critical for realistic biomedical simulations, and poor model selection can have life-threatening consequences for the patient. However, selecting the best model requires a profound domain knowledge and is limited to a few highly specialized experts in the field. Here we explore the feasibility of eliminating user involvement and automate the process of material modeling in finite element analyses. We leverage recent developments in constitutive neural networks, machine learning, and artificial intelligence to discover the best constitutive model from thousands of possible combinations of a few functional building blocks. We integrate all discoverable models into the finite element workflow by creating a universal material subroutine that contains more than 60,000 models, made up of 16 individual terms. We prototype this workflow using biaxial extension tests from healthy human arteries as input and stress and stretch profiles across the human aortic arch as output. Our results suggest that constitutive neural networks can robustly discover various flavors of arterial models from data, feed these models directly into a finite element simulation, and predict stress and strain profiles that compare favorably to the classical Holzapfel model. Replacing dozens of individual material subroutines by a single universal material subroutine—populated directly via automated model discovery—will make finite element simulations more user-friendly, more robust, and less vulnerable to human error. Democratizing finite element simulation by automating model selection could induce a paradigm shift in physics-based modeling, broaden access to simulation technologies, and empower individuals with varying levels of expertise and diverse backgrounds to actively participate in scientific discovery and push the boundaries of biomedical simulation.

Abstract Image

通过自动发现模型和通用材料子程序实现生物医学模拟民主化
个性化计算模拟已成为了解疾病的生物力学因素、预测疾病进展和设计个性化干预措施的重要工具。材料建模对于逼真的生物医学模拟至关重要,模型选择不当可能会给患者带来危及生命的后果。然而,选择最佳模型需要深厚的领域知识,而且仅限于该领域少数高度专业化的专家。在此,我们探讨了在有限元分析中消除用户参与并自动进行材料建模的可行性。我们利用最近在构造神经网络、机器学习和人工智能方面的发展,从少数功能构件的数千种可能组合中发现最佳构造模型。我们通过创建一个通用材料子程序,将所有可发现的模型集成到有限元工作流程中,该子程序包含由 16 个单项组成的 60,000 多个模型。我们使用健康人体动脉的双轴拉伸测试作为输入,并使用人体主动脉弓的应力和拉伸曲线作为输出,对这一工作流程进行了原型设计。我们的研究结果表明,构成神经网络可以从数据中稳健地发现各种动脉模型,将这些模型直接输入到有限元模拟中,并预测出与经典 Holzapfel 模型相媲美的应力和应变曲线。通过自动发现模型直接填充的单一通用材料子程序将取代数十个单独的材料子程序,这将使有限元模拟更加用户友好、更加稳健,并且不易出现人为错误。通过自动选择模型实现有限元仿真的民主化,可以促使基于物理的建模模式发生转变,扩大仿真技术的使用范围,并使具有不同专业水平和不同背景的个人能够积极参与科学发现,推动生物医学仿真的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Mechanics
Computational Mechanics 物理-力学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
12.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The journal reports original research of scholarly value in computational engineering and sciences. It focuses on areas that involve and enrich the application of mechanics, mathematics and numerical methods. It covers new methods and computationally-challenging technologies. Areas covered include method development in solid, fluid mechanics and materials simulations with application to biomechanics and mechanics in medicine, multiphysics, fracture mechanics, multiscale mechanics, particle and meshfree methods. Additionally, manuscripts including simulation and method development of synthesis of material systems are encouraged. Manuscripts reporting results obtained with established methods, unless they involve challenging computations, and manuscripts that report computations using commercial software packages are not encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信