Incentivizing Healthy Food Choices Using Add-On Bundling: A Field Experiment

Nymisha Bandi, Maxime C. Cohen, Saibal Ray
{"title":"Incentivizing Healthy Food Choices Using Add-On Bundling: A Field Experiment","authors":"Nymisha Bandi, Maxime C. Cohen, Saibal Ray","doi":"10.1287/msom.2023.0336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem definition: How can retailers incentivize customers to make healthier food choices? Price, convenience, and taste are known to be among the main drivers behind such choices. Unfortunately, healthier food options are often expensive and not adequately promoted. However, we are observing recent efforts to nudge customers toward healthier food. Methodology/results: In this paper, we conducted a field experiment with a global convenience store chain to better understand how different add-on bundle promotions influence healthy food choices. We considered three types of add-on bundles sequentially: (i) an unhealthy bundle (when customers purchased a coffee, they could add a pastry for $1), (ii) a healthy bundle (offering a healthy snack, such as fruit, vegetable, or protein, as a coffee add-on for $1), and (iii) a choice bundle (the option of either a pastry or a healthy snack as an add-on to coffee for $1). In addition to our field experiment, we conducted an online laboratory study to strengthen the validity of our results. Managerial implications: We found that offering healthy snacks as part of an add-on bundle significantly increased healthy purchases (and decreased unhealthy purchases). Surprisingly, this finding continued to hold for the choice bundle, that is, even when unhealthy snacks were concurrently on promotion. However, we did not observe a long-term stickiness effect, meaning that customers returned to their original (unhealthy) purchase patterns once the healthy or choice bundle was discontinued. Finally, we show that offering an add-on choice bundle is also beneficial for retailers, who can earn higher revenue and profit.Funding: This research was supported by the James McGill Scholar Award Fund, the Scale AI Chair Program, IIVADO (Institut de valorisation des données) Fundamental Research Project Grant, and two Discovery Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0336 .","PeriodicalId":501267,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem definition: How can retailers incentivize customers to make healthier food choices? Price, convenience, and taste are known to be among the main drivers behind such choices. Unfortunately, healthier food options are often expensive and not adequately promoted. However, we are observing recent efforts to nudge customers toward healthier food. Methodology/results: In this paper, we conducted a field experiment with a global convenience store chain to better understand how different add-on bundle promotions influence healthy food choices. We considered three types of add-on bundles sequentially: (i) an unhealthy bundle (when customers purchased a coffee, they could add a pastry for $1), (ii) a healthy bundle (offering a healthy snack, such as fruit, vegetable, or protein, as a coffee add-on for $1), and (iii) a choice bundle (the option of either a pastry or a healthy snack as an add-on to coffee for $1). In addition to our field experiment, we conducted an online laboratory study to strengthen the validity of our results. Managerial implications: We found that offering healthy snacks as part of an add-on bundle significantly increased healthy purchases (and decreased unhealthy purchases). Surprisingly, this finding continued to hold for the choice bundle, that is, even when unhealthy snacks were concurrently on promotion. However, we did not observe a long-term stickiness effect, meaning that customers returned to their original (unhealthy) purchase patterns once the healthy or choice bundle was discontinued. Finally, we show that offering an add-on choice bundle is also beneficial for retailers, who can earn higher revenue and profit.Funding: This research was supported by the James McGill Scholar Award Fund, the Scale AI Chair Program, IIVADO (Institut de valorisation des données) Fundamental Research Project Grant, and two Discovery Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0336 .
利用附加捆绑激励健康食品选择:现场实验
问题定义:零售商如何激励顾客选择更健康的食品?众所周知,价格、便利性和口味是促使人们做出此类选择的主要因素。遗憾的是,健康食品往往价格昂贵,而且推广力度不够。不过,我们注意到,最近零售商正在努力引导顾客选择更健康的食品。方法/结果:在本文中,我们对一家全球连锁便利店进行了实地实验,以更好地了解不同的附加捆绑促销如何影响健康食品的选择。我们依次考虑了三种类型的附加捆绑促销:(i) 不健康捆绑促销(顾客在购买咖啡时,可以以 1 美元的价格附加一份糕点),(ii) 健康捆绑促销(以 1 美元的价格提供一份健康零食,如水果、蔬菜或蛋白质,作为咖啡的附加品),以及 (iii) 选择捆绑促销(以 1 美元的价格提供一份糕点或一份健康零食,作为咖啡的附加品)。除实地实验外,我们还进行了在线实验室研究,以加强结果的有效性。管理意义:我们发现,提供健康小吃作为附加捆绑服务的一部分,会显著增加健康食品的购买量(减少不健康食品的购买量)。令人惊讶的是,这一结果在选择捆绑销售时依然有效,也就是说,即使不健康零食同时也在促销。然而,我们并没有观察到长期的粘性效应,也就是说,一旦健康或自选套餐停止促销,顾客又会回到原来的(不健康)购买模式。最后,我们表明,提供附加选择捆绑包对零售商也有好处,他们可以获得更高的收入和利润:本研究得到了詹姆斯-麦吉尔学者奖励基金、规模人工智能教席计划、IIVADO(数据估值研究所)基础研究项目资助以及加拿大自然科学与工程研究委员会的两项发现资助:在线附录见 https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0336 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信