Site Reassignment for Mobile Outreach Teams: Investigating the Effectiveness of Decentralized Decision Making

Lisanne van Rijn, Harwin de Vries, Luk N. Van Wassenhove
{"title":"Site Reassignment for Mobile Outreach Teams: Investigating the Effectiveness of Decentralized Decision Making","authors":"Lisanne van Rijn, Harwin de Vries, Luk N. Van Wassenhove","doi":"10.1287/msom.2021.0437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem definition: United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.8 states that health coverage should be universal by 2030. This is challenging in rural and poor areas. To address this challenge, mobile outreach teams of healthcare workers visit a fixed set of remote sites to provide healthcare services. Because of dynamics in demand and supply, once-rational site-to-team assignment decisions can become far from optimal over time. This paper considers the problem of reassigning sites to teams to maximize effectiveness. Solving this problem through a central planner does not fit the context: outreach teams commonly have a high degree of decision-making autonomy. We study a decentralized approach where subsets of teams collaborate in a series of team meetings to reassign sites. The key question for decision makers is whether and when such an approach is effective. Methodology/results: We propose a mixed-integer programming model for centralized site reassignment. We extend this model to represent the decentralized approach and develop a set of simple decision rules for this approach. We use empirical data from six country outreach programs of the nongovernmental organization MSI Reproductive Choices. Our results suggest that, when properly designed, decentralized decision making performs close to centralized decision making, and even outperforms it in the case of inaccurate information at the central level. The finding remains valid when demand and supply fluctuate, and is insensitive to the chosen objective. Managerial implications: Humanitarian organizations currently deploy mobile outreach teams to provide a wide variety of health services. We present several useful insights for decision makers in humanitarian organizations when making design choices, taking account of context. In particular, we show that decentralized site reassignment provides a feasible and effective alternative to centralized approaches in many contexts.Supplemental Material: The online supplement is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0437 .","PeriodicalId":501267,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem definition: United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.8 states that health coverage should be universal by 2030. This is challenging in rural and poor areas. To address this challenge, mobile outreach teams of healthcare workers visit a fixed set of remote sites to provide healthcare services. Because of dynamics in demand and supply, once-rational site-to-team assignment decisions can become far from optimal over time. This paper considers the problem of reassigning sites to teams to maximize effectiveness. Solving this problem through a central planner does not fit the context: outreach teams commonly have a high degree of decision-making autonomy. We study a decentralized approach where subsets of teams collaborate in a series of team meetings to reassign sites. The key question for decision makers is whether and when such an approach is effective. Methodology/results: We propose a mixed-integer programming model for centralized site reassignment. We extend this model to represent the decentralized approach and develop a set of simple decision rules for this approach. We use empirical data from six country outreach programs of the nongovernmental organization MSI Reproductive Choices. Our results suggest that, when properly designed, decentralized decision making performs close to centralized decision making, and even outperforms it in the case of inaccurate information at the central level. The finding remains valid when demand and supply fluctuate, and is insensitive to the chosen objective. Managerial implications: Humanitarian organizations currently deploy mobile outreach teams to provide a wide variety of health services. We present several useful insights for decision makers in humanitarian organizations when making design choices, taking account of context. In particular, we show that decentralized site reassignment provides a feasible and effective alternative to centralized approaches in many contexts.Supplemental Material: The online supplement is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0437 .
流动宣传队的站点重新分配:调查分散决策的有效性
问题定义:联合国可持续发展目标(SDG)3.8 规定,到 2030 年应实现全民医保。这在农村和贫困地区具有挑战性。为了应对这一挑战,由医疗工作者组成的流动外展团队到固定的偏远地区提供医疗服务。由于供需的动态变化,曾经合理的地点到团队的分配决策可能会随着时间的推移而变得远非最佳。本文探讨了如何重新分配医疗点与医疗队,以实现效益最大化的问题。通过中央规划者来解决这个问题并不符合实际情况:外联团队通常拥有高度的决策自主权。我们研究了一种分散的方法,即团队子集在一系列团队会议中合作重新分配站点。决策者面临的关键问题是这种方法是否有效以及何时有效。方法/结果:我们提出了一种集中式站点重新分配的混合整数编程模型。我们对该模型进行了扩展,以表示分散式方法,并为这种方法制定了一套简单的决策规则。我们使用了非政府组织 MSI 生殖选择的六个国家推广计划的经验数据。我们的结果表明,如果设计得当,分散决策的效果接近于集中决策,甚至在中央层面信息不准确的情况下,分散决策的效果优于集中决策。当供需发生波动时,这一结论依然有效,而且对所选目标不敏感。对管理的影响:人道主义组织目前正在部署流动外展团队,以提供各种医疗服务。考虑到具体情况,我们为人道主义组织的决策者在进行设计选择时提供了一些有用的见解。特别是,我们表明,在许多情况下,分散式站点重新分配为集中式方法提供了可行而有效的替代方案:在线补充材料可在 https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0437 上获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信