Reclaiming the concept of professionalism in the digital context: a principle-based concept analysis.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shaista Salman Guraya,Salman Yousuf Guraya,Fiza Rashid-Doubell,Salim Fredericks,Denis W Harkin,Mohd Zarawi Bin Mat Nor,Muhamad Saiful Bahri Yusoff
{"title":"Reclaiming the concept of professionalism in the digital context: a principle-based concept analysis.","authors":"Shaista Salman Guraya,Salman Yousuf Guraya,Fiza Rashid-Doubell,Salim Fredericks,Denis W Harkin,Mohd Zarawi Bin Mat Nor,Muhamad Saiful Bahri Yusoff","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2024.2398202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThere has been an alarming surge in the usage of social networking sites (SNSs) by healthcare professionals (HCPs) without adherence to the principles of professionalism. The widespread use of SNSs in medical practices has been coupled with reports of breaches of professional behaviors. Despite the benefits of SNSs, skepticism prevails about a clearly defined role for SNSs within medicine based upon the core principles of professionalism. Thus, there is a need to understand the manifestations of professionalism in the digital context, classically known as e-professionalism. This study systematically examines HCPs' perceptions of e-professionalism to advance a thorough understanding of e-professionalism.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis concept analysis was performed using the principle-based approach of Penrod and Hupcey. In January 2023, we searched the databases of PubMed and ISI Web of Science for English-language articles specific to 'e-professionalism' in the medical field. The final selected research corpus of 63 articles was analyzed in this study.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA comprehensive analysis of the selected articles highlighted that e-professionalism is an epistemologically mature and distinct concept by a standard definition. However, inconsistencies in conceptual meanings were reported due to varied interpretations despite digital literacy. The pragmatic utility showed a lack of sound methodological and philosophical paradigms. Perhaps the rapid technological advancements and manifestations have hampered linguistic maturity. However, logically, e-professionalism is perceived as an extension of conventional professionalism but with a focus on a distinct framework with a set of attributes to be digitally relevant.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThis study identifies a scarcity of research about the collective perspective of essential stakeholders, underpinning the need to further explore e-professionalism due to its emerging complex nature within the digital context. There is also a recognition that a framework is essential to guide future HCPs to yield a profound understanding and to provide remediation strategies in the rapidly advancing medical field in digital realm.","PeriodicalId":8371,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"46 1","pages":"2398202"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2398202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND There has been an alarming surge in the usage of social networking sites (SNSs) by healthcare professionals (HCPs) without adherence to the principles of professionalism. The widespread use of SNSs in medical practices has been coupled with reports of breaches of professional behaviors. Despite the benefits of SNSs, skepticism prevails about a clearly defined role for SNSs within medicine based upon the core principles of professionalism. Thus, there is a need to understand the manifestations of professionalism in the digital context, classically known as e-professionalism. This study systematically examines HCPs' perceptions of e-professionalism to advance a thorough understanding of e-professionalism. METHODS This concept analysis was performed using the principle-based approach of Penrod and Hupcey. In January 2023, we searched the databases of PubMed and ISI Web of Science for English-language articles specific to 'e-professionalism' in the medical field. The final selected research corpus of 63 articles was analyzed in this study. RESULTS A comprehensive analysis of the selected articles highlighted that e-professionalism is an epistemologically mature and distinct concept by a standard definition. However, inconsistencies in conceptual meanings were reported due to varied interpretations despite digital literacy. The pragmatic utility showed a lack of sound methodological and philosophical paradigms. Perhaps the rapid technological advancements and manifestations have hampered linguistic maturity. However, logically, e-professionalism is perceived as an extension of conventional professionalism but with a focus on a distinct framework with a set of attributes to be digitally relevant. CONCLUSION This study identifies a scarcity of research about the collective perspective of essential stakeholders, underpinning the need to further explore e-professionalism due to its emerging complex nature within the digital context. There is also a recognition that a framework is essential to guide future HCPs to yield a profound understanding and to provide remediation strategies in the rapidly advancing medical field in digital realm.
在数字化背景下重拾专业精神概念:基于原则的概念分析。
背景医疗保健专业人员(HCP)在不遵守专业原则的情况下使用社交网站(SNS)的情况急剧增加,令人担忧。在医疗实践中广泛使用 SNS 的同时,也有关于违反职业行为的报道。尽管 SNS 有诸多益处,但人们普遍怀疑 SNS 是否能根据专业精神的核心原则在医疗领域发挥明确的作用。因此,有必要了解专业精神在数字环境中的表现形式,也就是通常所说的电子专业精神。本研究系统性地考察了 HCPs 对电子专业主义的看法,以推进对电子专业主义的全面理解。方法本概念分析采用了 Penrod 和 Hupcey 的基于原则的方法。2023 年 1 月,我们在 PubMed 和 ISI Web of Science 数据库中搜索了医学领域有关 "电子专业主义 "的英文文章。结果对所选文章的综合分析突出表明,根据标准定义,电子专业主义是一个在认识论上成熟且独特的概念。然而,尽管具有数字素养,但由于对数字素养的解释各不相同,概念含义也不一致。实用性表明缺乏合理的方法论和哲学范式。也许技术的快速发展和表现阻碍了语言的成熟。然而,从逻辑上讲,电子专业主义被认为是传统专业主义的延伸,但其重点是具有一系列与数字相关属性的独特框架。人们还认识到,在数字领域快速发展的医疗领域,必须有一个框架来指导未来的医疗保健人员深刻理解并提供补救策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of medicine
Annals of medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
292
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Medicine is one of the world’s leading general medical review journals, boasting an impact factor of 5.435. It presents high-quality topical review articles, commissioned by the Editors and Editorial Committee, as well as original articles. The journal provides the current opinion on recent developments across the major medical specialties, with a particular focus on internal medicine. The peer-reviewed content of the journal keeps readers updated on the latest advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of diseases, and in how molecular medicine and genetics can be applied in daily clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信