Genomic affinity following restoration of a locally extirpated species: a case study of desert bighorn sheep in Texas

IF 2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Emily A. Wright, Joseph D. Manthey, Michael R. Buchalski, Bonnie R. McKinney, David A. Ray, Caleb D. Phillips, Robert D. Bradley
{"title":"Genomic affinity following restoration of a locally extirpated species: a case study of desert bighorn sheep in Texas","authors":"Emily A. Wright, Joseph D. Manthey, Michael R. Buchalski, Bonnie R. McKinney, David A. Ray, Caleb D. Phillips, Robert D. Bradley","doi":"10.1007/s10592-024-01635-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prior to its extirpation in the 1960s, <i>Ovis canadensis texianus</i> (a subspecies of desert bighorn sheep, DBS) occupied 16 mountain ranges in the Trans-Pecos Region of Texas. Restocking efforts relied on translocating individuals of DBS from Arizona, Nevada, Utah, and Mexico. One recipient site, Elephant Mountain Wildlife Management Area (WMA), now the primary source-stock for translocations in Texas, was examined to measure its genomic ancestry compared to other DBS from the Great Basin, Mojave, and Sonoran deserts. Genomic data (5,434–62,749 single nucleotide polymorphisms) were used to estimate kinship, inbreeding, and effective population size across three time periods (2000, 2017, and 2019). Individuals genetically were most similar to DBS from the Gabbs Valley Range and Muddy Mountains, Nevada (Mojave DBS lineage). Strong signatures of inbreeding were not detected among individuals. In addition, genetic pedigree reconstruction revealed familial relationships, including a four-generation pedigree, and indicated 39.51% and 41.89% of individuals translocated in 2017 and 2019, respectively, were parent–offspring or full-sibling pairs, suggesting capture methods tend to sample highly related individuals. In 2017, population estimates for Elephant Mountain WMA indicated 182 individuals with an effective population size (N<sub>e</sub>) of 65, whereas in 2019, N<sub>e</sub> was 92 with an estimated population size of 186. Although reintroduction efforts to Elephant Mountain WMA were successful, recurrent epizootic events since 2019 have reduced the population sizes of DBS across the Trans-Pecos Region. Our data illustrate how population genomics and overall assessments of genetic diversity can and should be used to guide management and conservation of DBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":55212,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-024-01635-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior to its extirpation in the 1960s, Ovis canadensis texianus (a subspecies of desert bighorn sheep, DBS) occupied 16 mountain ranges in the Trans-Pecos Region of Texas. Restocking efforts relied on translocating individuals of DBS from Arizona, Nevada, Utah, and Mexico. One recipient site, Elephant Mountain Wildlife Management Area (WMA), now the primary source-stock for translocations in Texas, was examined to measure its genomic ancestry compared to other DBS from the Great Basin, Mojave, and Sonoran deserts. Genomic data (5,434–62,749 single nucleotide polymorphisms) were used to estimate kinship, inbreeding, and effective population size across three time periods (2000, 2017, and 2019). Individuals genetically were most similar to DBS from the Gabbs Valley Range and Muddy Mountains, Nevada (Mojave DBS lineage). Strong signatures of inbreeding were not detected among individuals. In addition, genetic pedigree reconstruction revealed familial relationships, including a four-generation pedigree, and indicated 39.51% and 41.89% of individuals translocated in 2017 and 2019, respectively, were parent–offspring or full-sibling pairs, suggesting capture methods tend to sample highly related individuals. In 2017, population estimates for Elephant Mountain WMA indicated 182 individuals with an effective population size (Ne) of 65, whereas in 2019, Ne was 92 with an estimated population size of 186. Although reintroduction efforts to Elephant Mountain WMA were successful, recurrent epizootic events since 2019 have reduced the population sizes of DBS across the Trans-Pecos Region. Our data illustrate how population genomics and overall assessments of genetic diversity can and should be used to guide management and conservation of DBS.

Abstract Image

当地灭绝物种恢复后的基因组亲缘关系:得克萨斯州沙漠大角羊案例研究
在 20 世纪 60 年代灭绝之前,Ovis canadensis texianus(沙漠大角羊的一个亚种,DBS)占据了得克萨斯州跨佩克斯地区的 16 个山脉。重新放养工作依赖于从亚利桑那州、内华达州、犹他州和墨西哥迁移沙漠大角羊个体。象山野生动物管理区(WMA)是其中一个接收地,现在是得克萨斯州迁移的主要来源地,研究人员对其基因组祖先进行了研究,并与来自大盆地、莫哈韦和索诺拉沙漠的其他 DBS 进行了比较。基因组数据(5,434-62,749 个单核苷酸多态性)用于估算三个时期(2000 年、2017 年和 2019 年)的亲缘关系、近亲繁殖和有效种群规模。这些个体在基因上与来自内华达州加布斯山谷山脉和泥泞山脉(莫哈韦 DBS 系)的 DBS 最为相似。个体间未发现强烈的近亲繁殖特征。此外,遗传血统重建揭示了家族关系,包括四代血统,并表明2017年和2019年分别有39.51%和41.89%的易位个体是亲代或全同胞配对,表明捕获方法倾向于采样高亲缘关系的个体。2017 年,象山野生动物保护区的种群数量估计为 182 只,有效种群数量(Ne)为 65,而 2019 年的 Ne 为 92,估计种群数量为 186。尽管象山野生动物保护区的重引入工作取得了成功,但自 2019 年以来,反复发生的外来物种流行事件减少了整个跨佩科斯地区的 DBS 种群数量。我们的数据说明了种群基因组学和遗传多样性总体评估如何能够并应该用于指导 DBS 的管理和保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Genetics
Conservation Genetics 环境科学-生物多样性保护
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
58
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Conservation Genetics promotes the conservation of biodiversity by providing a forum for data and ideas, aiding the further development of this area of study. Contributions include work from the disciplines of population genetics, molecular ecology, molecular biology, evolutionary biology, systematics, forensics, and others. The focus is on genetic and evolutionary applications to problems of conservation, reflecting the diversity of concerns relevant to conservation biology. Studies are based on up-to-date technologies, including genomic methodologies. The journal publishes original research papers, short communications, review papers and perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信