Population genetic structure and range limits of Prostanthera cineolifera (Lamiaceae), a vulnerable shrub with a patchy distribution

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Ruth L. Palsson, Ian R. H. Telford, Jeremy J. Bruhl, Rose L. Andrew
{"title":"Population genetic structure and range limits of Prostanthera cineolifera (Lamiaceae), a vulnerable shrub with a patchy distribution","authors":"Ruth L. Palsson, Ian R. H. Telford, Jeremy J. Bruhl, Rose L. Andrew","doi":"10.1007/s10592-024-01637-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Integrating molecular data is essential for clarifying the distributions and genetic structures of species that have histories of misidentification and misapplication of names. There has been confusion about the species limits of the Vulnerable <i>Prostanthera cineolifera</i> with respect to morphologically similar specimens in the Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia and morphologically dissimilar specimens in the Lower Hawkesbury Valley, New South Wales, and from north-eastern New South Wales. To test the species limits of <i>P. cineolifera,</i> and related taxa, specimens were collected from across the range and augmented with herbarium specimens. We used morphometric analysis of 18 morphological characters across 51 samples. Using the DArTseq reduced representation sequencing platform, 4010 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across 110 individuals were recovered for molecular analysis. Both morphological and molecular analyses produced three concordant clusters (A) <i>P. cineolifera</i>, (B) a group sharing similarities with <i>P</i>. sp. Hawkesbury (B.J.Conn 2591), and (C) a group allied with <i>P.</i> <i>lanceolata</i> and <i>P. ovalifolia</i>. These results indicate that the specimens form north-eastern New South Wales are more likely to be <i>P. lanceolata</i>, not <i>P. cineolifera</i>, and that specimens from the Lower Hawkesbury are of an undescribed species with the phrase name <i>P</i>. sp. Hawkesbury (B.J.Conn 2591). Within <i>P. cineolifera</i> there was pronounced genetic differentiation among populations. Little evidence of inbreeding was observed, but the newly recognised, more isolated populations had the lowest genetic diversity. This study provides new information about the range of the species and its genetic structure that informs the conservation priorities for this species.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-024-01637-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrating molecular data is essential for clarifying the distributions and genetic structures of species that have histories of misidentification and misapplication of names. There has been confusion about the species limits of the Vulnerable Prostanthera cineolifera with respect to morphologically similar specimens in the Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia and morphologically dissimilar specimens in the Lower Hawkesbury Valley, New South Wales, and from north-eastern New South Wales. To test the species limits of P. cineolifera, and related taxa, specimens were collected from across the range and augmented with herbarium specimens. We used morphometric analysis of 18 morphological characters across 51 samples. Using the DArTseq reduced representation sequencing platform, 4010 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across 110 individuals were recovered for molecular analysis. Both morphological and molecular analyses produced three concordant clusters (A) P. cineolifera, (B) a group sharing similarities with P. sp. Hawkesbury (B.J.Conn 2591), and (C) a group allied with P. lanceolata and P. ovalifolia. These results indicate that the specimens form north-eastern New South Wales are more likely to be P. lanceolata, not P. cineolifera, and that specimens from the Lower Hawkesbury are of an undescribed species with the phrase name P. sp. Hawkesbury (B.J.Conn 2591). Within P. cineolifera there was pronounced genetic differentiation among populations. Little evidence of inbreeding was observed, but the newly recognised, more isolated populations had the lowest genetic diversity. This study provides new information about the range of the species and its genetic structure that informs the conservation priorities for this species.

Abstract Image

一种分布不均的脆弱灌木--Prostanthera cineolifera(Lamiaceae)的种群遗传结构和分布范围极限
分子数据的整合对于弄清物种的分布和遗传结构至关重要,因为这些物种曾被误认和误用名称。澳大利亚新南威尔士州猎人谷的形态相似标本与新南威尔士州下霍克斯伯里谷和新南威尔士州东北部的形态相异标本在易危的Prostanthera cineolifera的物种界限方面一直存在混淆。为了测试 P. cineolifera 及相关类群的种限,我们从整个分布区采集了标本,并用标本馆标本进行了补充。我们对 51 个样本的 18 个形态特征进行了形态计量分析。利用 DArTseq 简化表示测序平台,对 110 个个体的 4010 个单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)进行了分子分析。形态学和分子分析均得出了三个一致的群组(A)P. cineolifera,(B)与 P. sp. Hawkesbury(B.J.Conn 2591)相似的群组,以及(C)与 P. lanceolata 和 P. ovalifolia 相似的群组。这些结果表明,新南威尔士州东北部的标本更有可能是 P. lanceolata,而不是 P. cineolifera,下霍克斯伯里的标本属于一个未描述的物种,其短语名称为 P. sp. Hawkesbury(B.J.Conn 2591)。在 P. cineolifera 中,不同种群之间存在明显的遗传分化。近亲繁殖的证据很少,但新发现的、较为孤立的种群遗传多样性最低。这项研究提供了有关该物种分布范围及其遗传结构的新信息,为该物种的保护重点提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信