Rett Syndrome: The Emerging Landscape of Treatment Strategies

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alan K. Percy, Amitha Ananth, Jeffrey L. Neul
{"title":"Rett Syndrome: The Emerging Landscape of Treatment Strategies","authors":"Alan K. Percy, Amitha Ananth, Jeffrey L. Neul","doi":"10.1007/s40263-024-01106-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rett syndrome (RTT) has enjoyed remarkable progress in achieving specific therapies. RTT, a unique neurodevelopmental disorder first described in 1966, progressed slowly until the landmark paper of Hagberg and colleagues in 1983. Thereafter, rapid advances were achieved including the development of specific diagnostic criteria and the active search for a genetic etiology, resulting 16 years later in identification of variants in the methyl-CpG-binding protein (<i>MECP2</i>) gene located at Xq28. Shortly thereafter, the NIH Office of Rare Diseases funded the RTT Natural History Study (NHS) in 2003, initiating the acquisition of natural history data on clinical features from a large population of individuals with RTT. This information was essential for advancement of clinical trials to provide specific therapies for this disorder. In the process, the International Rett Syndrome Association (IRSA) was formed (now the International Rett Syndrome Foundation—IRSF), which participated directly in encouraging and expanding enrollment in the NHS and, subsequently, in developing the SCOUT program to facilitate testing of potential therapeutic agents in a mouse model of RTT. The overall objective was to review clinical characteristics developed from the NHS and to discuss the status of specific therapies for this progressive neurodevelopmental disorder. The NHS study provided critical information on RTT: growth, anthropometrics, longevity, key comorbidities including epilepsy, breath abnormalities, gastroesophageal dysfunction, scoliosis and other orthopedic issues, puberty, behavior and anxiety, and progressive motor deterioration including the appearance of parkinsonian features. Phenotype–genotype correlations were noted including the role of X chromosome inactivation. Development of clinical severity and quality of life measures also proved critical for subsequent clinical trials. Further, development of biochemical and neurophysiologic biomarkers offered further endpoints for clinical trials. Initial clinical trials prior to the NHS were ineffective, but advances resulting from the NHS and other studies worldwide promoted significant interest from pharmaceutical firms resulting in several clinical trials. While some of these have been unrewarding such as sarizotan, others have been quite promising including the approval of trofinetide by the FDA in 2023 as the first agent available for specific treatment of RTT. Blarcamesine has been trialed in phase 3 trials, 14 agents have been studied in phase 2 trials, and 7 agents are being evaluated in preclinical/translational studies. A landmark study in 2007 by Guy et al. demonstrated that activation of a normal <i>MECP2</i> gene in a null mouse model resulted in significant improvement. Gene replacement therapy has advanced through translational studies to two current phase 1/2 clinical trials (Taysha102 and Neurogene-401). Additional genetic therapies are also under study including gene editing, RNA editing, and X-chromosome reactivation. Taken together, progress in understanding and treating RTT over the past 40 years has been remarkable. This suggests that further advances can be expected.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-024-01106-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rett syndrome (RTT) has enjoyed remarkable progress in achieving specific therapies. RTT, a unique neurodevelopmental disorder first described in 1966, progressed slowly until the landmark paper of Hagberg and colleagues in 1983. Thereafter, rapid advances were achieved including the development of specific diagnostic criteria and the active search for a genetic etiology, resulting 16 years later in identification of variants in the methyl-CpG-binding protein (MECP2) gene located at Xq28. Shortly thereafter, the NIH Office of Rare Diseases funded the RTT Natural History Study (NHS) in 2003, initiating the acquisition of natural history data on clinical features from a large population of individuals with RTT. This information was essential for advancement of clinical trials to provide specific therapies for this disorder. In the process, the International Rett Syndrome Association (IRSA) was formed (now the International Rett Syndrome Foundation—IRSF), which participated directly in encouraging and expanding enrollment in the NHS and, subsequently, in developing the SCOUT program to facilitate testing of potential therapeutic agents in a mouse model of RTT. The overall objective was to review clinical characteristics developed from the NHS and to discuss the status of specific therapies for this progressive neurodevelopmental disorder. The NHS study provided critical information on RTT: growth, anthropometrics, longevity, key comorbidities including epilepsy, breath abnormalities, gastroesophageal dysfunction, scoliosis and other orthopedic issues, puberty, behavior and anxiety, and progressive motor deterioration including the appearance of parkinsonian features. Phenotype–genotype correlations were noted including the role of X chromosome inactivation. Development of clinical severity and quality of life measures also proved critical for subsequent clinical trials. Further, development of biochemical and neurophysiologic biomarkers offered further endpoints for clinical trials. Initial clinical trials prior to the NHS were ineffective, but advances resulting from the NHS and other studies worldwide promoted significant interest from pharmaceutical firms resulting in several clinical trials. While some of these have been unrewarding such as sarizotan, others have been quite promising including the approval of trofinetide by the FDA in 2023 as the first agent available for specific treatment of RTT. Blarcamesine has been trialed in phase 3 trials, 14 agents have been studied in phase 2 trials, and 7 agents are being evaluated in preclinical/translational studies. A landmark study in 2007 by Guy et al. demonstrated that activation of a normal MECP2 gene in a null mouse model resulted in significant improvement. Gene replacement therapy has advanced through translational studies to two current phase 1/2 clinical trials (Taysha102 and Neurogene-401). Additional genetic therapies are also under study including gene editing, RNA editing, and X-chromosome reactivation. Taken together, progress in understanding and treating RTT over the past 40 years has been remarkable. This suggests that further advances can be expected.

雷特综合征:新出现的治疗策略
雷特综合征(RTT)在特定疗法方面取得了显著进展。雷特综合征是一种独特的神经发育障碍,于 1966 年首次被描述,在哈格伯格及其同事于 1983 年发表具有里程碑意义的论文之前,该病一直进展缓慢。此后,该病取得了突飞猛进的发展,包括制定了具体的诊断标准,并积极寻找遗传病因,结果在 16 年后发现了位于 Xq28 的甲基-CpG 结合蛋白(MECP2)基因的变异。此后不久,美国国立卫生研究院罕见病办公室于 2003 年资助了 RTT 自然史研究(NHS),开始从大量 RTT 患者中获取有关临床特征的自然史数据。这些信息对于推进临床试验,为该疾病提供特异性疗法至关重要。在此过程中,成立了国际雷特综合征协会(IRSA)(现为国际雷特综合征基金会-IRSF),该协会直接参与了鼓励和扩大 NHS 注册人数的工作,随后又参与了 SCOUT 计划的开发,以促进在 RTT 小鼠模型中测试潜在的治疗药物。会议的总体目标是回顾从 NHS 研究中得出的临床特征,并讨论针对这种进行性神经发育障碍的特定疗法的现状。NHS 研究提供了有关 RTT 的关键信息:生长、人体测量学、寿命、主要合并症(包括癫痫、呼吸异常、胃食管功能障碍、脊柱侧凸和其他矫形问题)、青春期、行为和焦虑以及进行性运动退化(包括出现帕金森病特征)。研究还注意到表型与基因型的相关性,包括 X 染色体失活的作用。临床严重程度和生活质量测量方法的开发对于后续的临床试验也至关重要。此外,生化和神经生理学生物标志物的开发为临床试验提供了更多终点。国家医疗服务体系之前的最初临床试验效果不佳,但国家医疗服务体系和全球其他研究取得的进展引起了制药公司的极大兴趣,并促成了多项临床试验。虽然其中一些临床试验没有取得成果,如沙立唑坦,但其他一些临床试验却很有希望,包括美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)于 2023 年批准了特罗菲奈肽(trofinetide),这是第一种可用于专门治疗 RTT 的药物。Blarcamesine 已在 3 期试验中试用,14 种药物已在 2 期试验中研究,7 种药物正在临床前/横向研究中评估。盖伊等人在 2007 年进行的一项具有里程碑意义的研究表明,在无效小鼠模型中激活正常的 MECP2 基因可显著改善病情。基因替代疗法已通过转化研究推进到目前的两项 1 / 2 期临床试验(Taysha102 和 Neurogene-401)。其他基因疗法也在研究之中,包括基因编辑、RNA 编辑和 X 染色体再激活。总之,在过去的 40 年中,人们在了解和治疗 RTT 方面取得了显著进展。这表明,进一步的进步是可以期待的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CNS drugs
CNS drugs 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: CNS Drugs promotes rational pharmacotherapy within the disciplines of clinical psychiatry and neurology. The Journal includes: - Overviews of contentious or emerging issues. - Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on pharmacological approaches to managing neurological and psychiatric illnesses. - Systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. - Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs in neurology and psychiatry. - Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to clinical practice, such as clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological studies. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in CNS Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信