Performance of binary MLC using real-time optical sensor feedback system

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nathan A. Corradini, Cristina Vite, Patrizia Urso
{"title":"Performance of binary MLC using real-time optical sensor feedback system","authors":"Nathan A. Corradini,&nbsp;Cristina Vite,&nbsp;Patrizia Urso","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Radixact system (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) is the latest platform release based on the TomoTherapy technology. The most recent system does not apply a leaf latency model correction after plan optimization to ensure the correct MLC leaf-open time (LOT) agreement between the TPS and machine delivery. The MLC uses optical sensors to measure the delivered LOTs in real-time and individual leaf-specific latency corrections are made to ensure agreement. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the Radixact MLC with leaf-specific latency correction using the optical sensor's real-time feedback. Specifically, the study statistically evaluated the MLC LOT errors observed from 290 plan-specific quality assurance (PSQA) measurements. Repeatability testing was performed to quantify the uncertainty in the MLC feedback system delivery by analyzing &gt; 1300 delivered treatment fractions throughout the course of radiotherapy. The clinical impact was evaluated by estimating the resulting dose difference in the patient targets due to the measured plan latencies. Our study measured an average plan latency equal to 2.0 ± 0.4 ms (0.6% ± 0.2%) for 290 PSQAs. Repeatability tests showed a mean standard deviation in plan latencies measuring 0.05 ms (0.02%). The deviation from the TPS in the mean target dose due to the plan latencies was estimated to be 0.0% ± 0.2% (range: -0.7%–1.1%). The current MLC system with real-time optical sensor feedback is capable of accurately delivering the TPS-generated sinograms. Repeatability test results showed that the system allows for high reliability in daily sinogram delivery. The MLC latency deviations were shown to have minimal clinical impact on the overall target dosimetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.14506","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.14506","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Radixact system (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) is the latest platform release based on the TomoTherapy technology. The most recent system does not apply a leaf latency model correction after plan optimization to ensure the correct MLC leaf-open time (LOT) agreement between the TPS and machine delivery. The MLC uses optical sensors to measure the delivered LOTs in real-time and individual leaf-specific latency corrections are made to ensure agreement. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the Radixact MLC with leaf-specific latency correction using the optical sensor's real-time feedback. Specifically, the study statistically evaluated the MLC LOT errors observed from 290 plan-specific quality assurance (PSQA) measurements. Repeatability testing was performed to quantify the uncertainty in the MLC feedback system delivery by analyzing > 1300 delivered treatment fractions throughout the course of radiotherapy. The clinical impact was evaluated by estimating the resulting dose difference in the patient targets due to the measured plan latencies. Our study measured an average plan latency equal to 2.0 ± 0.4 ms (0.6% ± 0.2%) for 290 PSQAs. Repeatability tests showed a mean standard deviation in plan latencies measuring 0.05 ms (0.02%). The deviation from the TPS in the mean target dose due to the plan latencies was estimated to be 0.0% ± 0.2% (range: -0.7%–1.1%). The current MLC system with real-time optical sensor feedback is capable of accurately delivering the TPS-generated sinograms. Repeatability test results showed that the system allows for high reliability in daily sinogram delivery. The MLC latency deviations were shown to have minimal clinical impact on the overall target dosimetry.

Abstract Image

使用实时光学传感器反馈系统的二进制 MLC 性能
Radixact 系统(Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA)是基于 TomoTherapy 技术的最新平台版本。最新的系统在计划优化后不应用叶片延迟模型校正,以确保 TPS 和机器传输之间的 MLC 叶片打开时间 (LOT) 正确一致。MLC 使用光学传感器实时测量交付的 LOT,并针对每个叶片进行延迟修正,以确保一致性。本研究的目的是评估 Radixact MLC 的性能,并利用光学传感器的实时反馈进行特定叶片的延迟校正。具体来说,这项研究对从 290 次特定计划质量保证 (PSQA) 测量中观察到的 MLC LOT 误差进行了统计评估。重复性测试通过分析整个放疗过程中的 1300 个治疗分数,量化了 MLC 反馈系统传输的不确定性。通过估算因测量到的计划延迟而导致的患者目标剂量差异,评估了对临床的影响。我们的研究测得 290 个 PSQAs 的平均计划延迟时间为 2.0 ± 0.4 毫秒(0.6% ± 0.2%)。重复性测试显示,计划潜伏期的平均标准偏差为 0.05 毫秒(0.02%)。据估计,计划延迟导致的平均目标剂量与 TPS 的偏差为 0.0% ± 0.2%(范围:-0.7%-1.1%)。目前的 MLC 系统带有实时光学传感器反馈,能够准确地提供 TPS 生成的正弦曲线。可重复性测试结果表明,该系统在日常正弦曲线传送方面具有很高的可靠性。MLC 的延迟偏差对总体目标剂量测定的临床影响极小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信