A detailed dive into fitting strategies for GRB afterglows with contamination: A case study with kilonovae

Wendy Fu Wallace, Nikhil Sarin
{"title":"A detailed dive into fitting strategies for GRB afterglows with contamination: A case study with kilonovae","authors":"Wendy Fu Wallace, Nikhil Sarin","doi":"arxiv-2409.07539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Observations of gamma-ray burst afterglows have begun to readily reveal\ncontamination from a kilonova or a supernova. This contamination presents\nsignificant challenges towards traditional methods of inferring the properties\nof these phenomena from observations. Given current knowledge of kilonova and\nafterglow modelling, observations (as expected) with near-infrared bands and at\nearly observing times provide the greatest diagnostic power for both observing\nthe presence of a kilonova and inferences on its properties in gamma-ray burst\nafterglows. However, contemporaneous observations in radio and X-ray are\ncritical for reducing the afterglow parameter space and for more efficient\nparameter estimation. We compare different methods for fitting joint kilonova\nand afterglow observations under different scenarios. We find that ignoring the\ncontribution of one source (even in scenarios where the source is sub-dominant)\ncan lead to significantly biased estimated parameters but could still produce\ngreat light curve fits that do not raise suspicion. This bias is also present\nfor analyses that fit data where one source is \"subtracted\". In most scenarios,\nthe bias is smaller than the systematic uncertainty inherent to kilonova models\nbut significant for afterglow parameters, particularly in the absence of\nhigh-quality radio and X-ray observations. Instead, we show that the most\nreliable method for inference in any scenario where contamination can not be\nconfidently dismissed is to jointly fit for both an afterglow and\nkilonova/supernova, and showcase a Bayesian framework to make this joint\nanalysis computationally feasible.","PeriodicalId":501343,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Observations of gamma-ray burst afterglows have begun to readily reveal contamination from a kilonova or a supernova. This contamination presents significant challenges towards traditional methods of inferring the properties of these phenomena from observations. Given current knowledge of kilonova and afterglow modelling, observations (as expected) with near-infrared bands and at early observing times provide the greatest diagnostic power for both observing the presence of a kilonova and inferences on its properties in gamma-ray burst afterglows. However, contemporaneous observations in radio and X-ray are critical for reducing the afterglow parameter space and for more efficient parameter estimation. We compare different methods for fitting joint kilonova and afterglow observations under different scenarios. We find that ignoring the contribution of one source (even in scenarios where the source is sub-dominant) can lead to significantly biased estimated parameters but could still produce great light curve fits that do not raise suspicion. This bias is also present for analyses that fit data where one source is "subtracted". In most scenarios, the bias is smaller than the systematic uncertainty inherent to kilonova models but significant for afterglow parameters, particularly in the absence of high-quality radio and X-ray observations. Instead, we show that the most reliable method for inference in any scenario where contamination can not be confidently dismissed is to jointly fit for both an afterglow and kilonova/supernova, and showcase a Bayesian framework to make this joint analysis computationally feasible.
对有污染的 GRB 后辉光拟合策略的详细研究:千新星案例研究
对伽马射线暴余辉的观测已经开始轻易地揭示出来自千新星或超新星的污染。这种污染对从观测中推断这些现象特性的传统方法提出了重大挑战。根据目前对千新星和余辉建模的了解,使用近红外波段和较早观测时间进行的观测(正如预期的那样)为观测千新星的存在和推断其在伽马射线暴余辉中的性质提供了最大的诊断能力。然而,同时进行的射电和 X 射线观测对于缩小余辉参数空间和更有效地估计参数至关重要。我们比较了在不同情况下拟合千新星和余辉联合观测数据的不同方法。我们发现,忽略一个光源的贡献(即使在该光源处于次主导地位的情况下)会导致估计参数出现明显偏差,但仍然可以产生很好的光曲线拟合,不会引起怀疑。这种偏差也存在于 "减去 "一个光源的数据拟合分析中。在大多数情况下,这种偏差小于千新星模型固有的系统不确定性,但对于余辉参数来说却很重要,尤其是在缺乏高质量的射电和 X 射线观测数据的情况下。相反,我们表明,在任何情况下,如果不能有把握地排除污染,最可靠的推断方法就是同时拟合余辉和基洛新星/超新星,并展示了一个贝叶斯框架,使这种联合分析在计算上可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信