The refuse dump provides information that influences the foraging preferences of leaf‐cutting ants

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Andrea Marina Alma, Andres Arenas, Patrica Carina Fernandez, Micaela Buteler
{"title":"The refuse dump provides information that influences the foraging preferences of leaf‐cutting ants","authors":"Andrea Marina Alma, Andres Arenas, Patrica Carina Fernandez, Micaela Buteler","doi":"10.1111/een.13380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>The ability to respond to local stimuli individually and propagate information among colony members has allowed social organisms to generate collective responses. Leaf‐cutting ants are an excellent model to study this because, apart from exchanging information among groups assigned to different tasks (foragers, gardeners, and midden workers—ants working in refuse dumps), they also do so with their symbiotic fungus.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Here, we tested the role of refuse dumps as an information centre influencing the foraging decisions of <jats:italic>Acromyrmex lobicornis</jats:italic> under field conditions. To simulate the presence of discarded resources, oat flakes were added to the refuse dumps of treated colonies, while the refuse dumps of controls remained untreated. After 24 h and for 6 weeks, we offered new clean oat flakes on the foraging trails simultaneously with cornflakes, another palatable resource that was never experienced by the ants on the dump.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Although the oat flakes were suitable for the ants and harmless to the fungus, the acceptance index—a ratio of oat flakes foraged to total oat and cornflakes offered—decreased by 55% 24 h after the ants interacted with oat flakes in the refuse dump. After 6 weeks, the acceptance index recovered to levels that did not differ from initial values.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Therefore, ants might use waste to obtain information about the suitability of resources found in foraging trails. We explore potential mechanisms underlying the transmission of information from refuse dumps to foraging trails, shedding light on the intricate dynamics of collective decision‐making in social insect colonies.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":50557,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Entomology","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/een.13380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to respond to local stimuli individually and propagate information among colony members has allowed social organisms to generate collective responses. Leaf‐cutting ants are an excellent model to study this because, apart from exchanging information among groups assigned to different tasks (foragers, gardeners, and midden workers—ants working in refuse dumps), they also do so with their symbiotic fungus. Here, we tested the role of refuse dumps as an information centre influencing the foraging decisions of Acromyrmex lobicornis under field conditions. To simulate the presence of discarded resources, oat flakes were added to the refuse dumps of treated colonies, while the refuse dumps of controls remained untreated. After 24 h and for 6 weeks, we offered new clean oat flakes on the foraging trails simultaneously with cornflakes, another palatable resource that was never experienced by the ants on the dump. Although the oat flakes were suitable for the ants and harmless to the fungus, the acceptance index—a ratio of oat flakes foraged to total oat and cornflakes offered—decreased by 55% 24 h after the ants interacted with oat flakes in the refuse dump. After 6 weeks, the acceptance index recovered to levels that did not differ from initial values. Therefore, ants might use waste to obtain information about the suitability of resources found in foraging trails. We explore potential mechanisms underlying the transmission of information from refuse dumps to foraging trails, shedding light on the intricate dynamics of collective decision‐making in social insect colonies.
垃圾堆提供了影响切叶蚁觅食偏好的信息
对局部刺激做出个体反应并在群体成员之间传播信息的能力,使社会有机体能够做出集体反应。切叶蚁是一个很好的研究模型,因为它们除了在被分配执行不同任务的群体(觅食者、园丁和隐蔽工人--在垃圾场工作的蚂蚁)之间交换信息外,还与它们的共生真菌交换信息。在这里,我们测试了垃圾场作为信息中心在野外条件下影响小龙虾觅食决策的作用。为了模拟废弃资源的存在,我们在处理过的蚁群的垃圾堆中添加了燕麦片,而对照组的垃圾堆则未经处理。24 小时后和 6 周后,我们在觅食小径上提供新的干净燕麦片,同时提供玉米片,这是垃圾堆上蚂蚁从未体验过的另一种适口资源。尽管燕麦片适合蚂蚁食用,对真菌也无害,但在蚂蚁与垃圾场中的燕麦片接触 24 小时后,接受指数--觅食的燕麦片与提供的燕麦片和玉米片总量之比--下降了 55%。6 周后,接受指数恢复到与初始值无差异的水平。因此,蚂蚁可能会利用垃圾来获取有关觅食路径中资源适宜性的信息。我们探讨了从垃圾堆到觅食径的信息传递的潜在机制,揭示了社会性昆虫群落中集体决策的复杂动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Entomology
Ecological Entomology 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Entomology publishes top-quality original research on the ecology of insects and related invertebrate taxa. Our aim is to publish papers that will be of considerable interest to the wide community of ecologists who are motivated by ecological or evolutionary theory. The suitability of a manuscript will usually be assessed within 5 days. We publish full-length Original Articles as well as Reviews, Short Communications, Methods and Natural History papers. In Original Articles, we greatly prefer papers that test specific hypotheses and which have a high degree of novelty. All categories aim for innovative contributions that advance the subject of ecological entomology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信