Evaluation metrics on text summarization: comprehensive survey

IF 2.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Ensieh Davoodijam, Mohsen Alambardar Meybodi
{"title":"Evaluation metrics on text summarization: comprehensive survey","authors":"Ensieh Davoodijam, Mohsen Alambardar Meybodi","doi":"10.1007/s10115-024-02217-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Automatic text summarization is the process of shortening a large document into a summary text that preserves the main concepts and key points of the original document. Due to the wide applications of text summarization, many studies have been conducted on it, but evaluating the quality of generated summaries poses significant challenges. Selecting the appropriate evaluation metrics to capture various aspects of summarization quality, including content, structure, coherence, readability, novelty, and semantic relevance, plays a crucial role in text summarization application. To address this challenge, the main focus of this study is on gathering and investigating a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics. Analysis of various metrics can enhance the understanding of the evaluation method and leads to select appropriate evaluation text summarization systems in the future. After a short review of various automatic text summarization methods, we thoroughly analyze 42 prominent metrics, categorizing them into six distinct categories to provide insights into their strengths, limitations, and applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":54749,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Information Systems","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-024-02217-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automatic text summarization is the process of shortening a large document into a summary text that preserves the main concepts and key points of the original document. Due to the wide applications of text summarization, many studies have been conducted on it, but evaluating the quality of generated summaries poses significant challenges. Selecting the appropriate evaluation metrics to capture various aspects of summarization quality, including content, structure, coherence, readability, novelty, and semantic relevance, plays a crucial role in text summarization application. To address this challenge, the main focus of this study is on gathering and investigating a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics. Analysis of various metrics can enhance the understanding of the evaluation method and leads to select appropriate evaluation text summarization systems in the future. After a short review of various automatic text summarization methods, we thoroughly analyze 42 prominent metrics, categorizing them into six distinct categories to provide insights into their strengths, limitations, and applicability.

Abstract Image

文本摘要的评估指标:全面调查
自动文本摘要是将大型文档缩短为摘要文本的过程,摘要文本保留了原始文档的主要概念和要点。由于文本摘要的广泛应用,人们对其进行了大量研究,但对生成摘要的质量进行评估却面临着巨大挑战。选择合适的评价指标来捕捉摘要质量的各个方面,包括内容、结构、连贯性、可读性、新颖性和语义相关性,在文本摘要应用中起着至关重要的作用。为应对这一挑战,本研究的重点是收集和研究一套全面的评价指标。对各种指标的分析可以加深对评价方法的理解,并为将来选择合适的评价文本摘要系统提供依据。在对各种自动文本摘要方法进行简短回顾之后,我们对 42 个著名的指标进行了深入分析,并将它们分为六个不同的类别,以便深入了解它们的优势、局限性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Knowledge and Information Systems
Knowledge and Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
152
审稿时长
7.2 months
期刊介绍: Knowledge and Information Systems (KAIS) provides an international forum for researchers and professionals to share their knowledge and report new advances on all topics related to knowledge systems and advanced information systems. This monthly peer-reviewed archival journal publishes state-of-the-art research reports on emerging topics in KAIS, reviews of important techniques in related areas, and application papers of interest to a general readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信