Stop leaving people with disability behind: Reviewing comprehensive sexuality education for people with disability

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kim Andreassen, Jordina Quain, Emily Castell
{"title":"Stop leaving people with disability behind: Reviewing comprehensive sexuality education for people with disability","authors":"Kim Andreassen, Jordina Quain, Emily Castell","doi":"10.1177/00178969241269656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:The pathologisation of people with disability<jats:sup>1</jats:sup> has long affected the educational quality of the sexuality education they receive. Whilst concern for people with disability has been growing in some comprehensive sexuality education settings, the quality of education in these spaces is variable and typically accommodations for people with disability are not made. The lack of accessibility fosters few opportunities to learn about and practise skills related to establishing and maintaining social relationships, including platonic, romantic and sexual relationships, thereby limiting informed decision-making. Moreover, the lack of good quality sexuality education significantly increases the risk of sexual abuse, assault, and family and domestic violence – impacting people with disability’s self-determination, autonomy and ultimately, ability to work, live independently, and maintain their mental and physical health.Objective:Few reviews of comprehensive sexuality education programmes for people with disability have been reported. Therefore, four current comprehensive sexuality education programmes for people with disability were reviewed, including their content and the topics included; the feasibility of implementation including costs; different accessibility considerations for varied learners and disabilities; and methods of delivery. This allowed an assessment of their strengths and opportunities for people with disability.Results:The review highlighted strong positive changes occurring within the field, as well as challenges due to funding limitations, and the extensive number of topics under comprehensive sexuality education that need to be addressed in teaching and delivering quality comprehensive sexuality education to people with disability.Conclusion:Informed by the evidence in this review, we advocate for the inclusion of a more comprehensive range of topics, including gender and sexuality diversity within accessible comprehensive sexuality education for people with disability, and the establishment of appropriate forms of teacher education and training to increase confidence and comfort when delivering comprehensive sexuality education to people with disability.","PeriodicalId":47346,"journal":{"name":"Health Education Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969241269656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:The pathologisation of people with disability1 has long affected the educational quality of the sexuality education they receive. Whilst concern for people with disability has been growing in some comprehensive sexuality education settings, the quality of education in these spaces is variable and typically accommodations for people with disability are not made. The lack of accessibility fosters few opportunities to learn about and practise skills related to establishing and maintaining social relationships, including platonic, romantic and sexual relationships, thereby limiting informed decision-making. Moreover, the lack of good quality sexuality education significantly increases the risk of sexual abuse, assault, and family and domestic violence – impacting people with disability’s self-determination, autonomy and ultimately, ability to work, live independently, and maintain their mental and physical health.Objective:Few reviews of comprehensive sexuality education programmes for people with disability have been reported. Therefore, four current comprehensive sexuality education programmes for people with disability were reviewed, including their content and the topics included; the feasibility of implementation including costs; different accessibility considerations for varied learners and disabilities; and methods of delivery. This allowed an assessment of their strengths and opportunities for people with disability.Results:The review highlighted strong positive changes occurring within the field, as well as challenges due to funding limitations, and the extensive number of topics under comprehensive sexuality education that need to be addressed in teaching and delivering quality comprehensive sexuality education to people with disability.Conclusion:Informed by the evidence in this review, we advocate for the inclusion of a more comprehensive range of topics, including gender and sexuality diversity within accessible comprehensive sexuality education for people with disability, and the establishment of appropriate forms of teacher education and training to increase confidence and comfort when delivering comprehensive sexuality education to people with disability.
停止遗弃残疾人:审查针对残疾人的全面性教育
背景:长期以来,将残疾人病理化1 的做法影响了他们所接受的性教育的质量。虽然在一些综合性教育机构中,对残障人士的关注与日俱增,但这些机构的教育质量参差不齐,通常不会为残障人士提供便利。由于缺乏无障碍环境,很少有机会学习和练习与建立和维持社会关系(包括柏拉图式、浪漫式和性关系)有关的技能,从而限制了知情决策。此外,缺乏高质量的性教育大大增加了性虐待、性侵犯、家庭暴力的风险--影响了残疾人的自决、自主,并最终影响了他们工作、独立生活以及保持身心健康的能力。因此,我们对目前针对残障人士的四项综合性教育计划进行了回顾,包括其内容和所包含的主题;实施的可行性,包括成本;针对不同学习者和残障人士的不同无障碍考虑因素;以及实施方法。结果:审查强调了该领域正在发生的巨大积极变化,以及由于资金限制和全面性教育下的大量主题所带来的挑战,这些都是在向残疾人教授和提供高质量的全面性教育时需要解决的问题。结论:根据本综述中的证据,我们主张将更全面的主题(包括性别和性的多样性)纳入面向残障人士的无障碍全面性教育中,并建立适当形式的教师教育和培训,以提高教师在向残障人士提供全面性教育时的信心和舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Health Education Journal is a leading peer reviewed journal established in 1943. It carries original papers on health promotion and education research, policy development and good practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信