Advancing doctoral student professional development through a strengths-based cohort program

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Connor L. Ferguson, Julie A. Lockman
{"title":"Advancing doctoral student professional development through a strengths-based cohort program","authors":"Connor L. Ferguson, Julie A. Lockman","doi":"10.1108/sgpe-01-2024-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Strengths-based professional development has been associated with positive outcomes in academia and in the organizational workplace. Students pursuing their doctoral degrees in the biomedical sciences in the US are often on graduate assistantships, where they experience an academic component to their training integrated with an employee-like existence. The individual who serves as their academic and research advisor is often their supervisor, who pays their stipend. The traditional training structure poses unique challenges and may be accompanied by stress, burnout and imposter phenomenon. The purpose of this study is to utilize a strengths-based approach to equip students with essential personal and professional skills that build self-awareness and self-confidence further preparing them for their future in the scientific workforce.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors developed and implemented a novel strengths-based professional development cohort program for doctoral students in the biomedical sciences at a research-intensive (R1) institution. The program was designed to create a supportive and inclusive space for participants (<em>n</em> = 18) to explore their identity as a student and scientists and to develop and leverage their talents for more effective and strategic use. Program outcomes were evaluated through a mixed methods case study design using a post-program Likert-based survey (<em>n</em> = 10 participants) and participant interviews (<em>n</em> = 13). Explanatory sequential design was used in the interpretation of the findings.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results show that the program had a positive impact on students’ perceptions of themselves as scientists, as well as on their self-efficacy, self-confidence and interpersonal interactions in the research setting.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This strengths-based professional development program demonstrates immense potential as a model to equip students with self-awareness and a new foundation of essential skills needed to supplement their technical and scientific training for their future careers in the team-based workplace.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study demonstrates how professional development programming can complement scientific training by equipping students with self-awareness and other lifelong skills to navigate feelings of imposter phenomenon and interpersonal relationships in the team-based workplace.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":42038,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-01-2024-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Strengths-based professional development has been associated with positive outcomes in academia and in the organizational workplace. Students pursuing their doctoral degrees in the biomedical sciences in the US are often on graduate assistantships, where they experience an academic component to their training integrated with an employee-like existence. The individual who serves as their academic and research advisor is often their supervisor, who pays their stipend. The traditional training structure poses unique challenges and may be accompanied by stress, burnout and imposter phenomenon. The purpose of this study is to utilize a strengths-based approach to equip students with essential personal and professional skills that build self-awareness and self-confidence further preparing them for their future in the scientific workforce.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors developed and implemented a novel strengths-based professional development cohort program for doctoral students in the biomedical sciences at a research-intensive (R1) institution. The program was designed to create a supportive and inclusive space for participants (n = 18) to explore their identity as a student and scientists and to develop and leverage their talents for more effective and strategic use. Program outcomes were evaluated through a mixed methods case study design using a post-program Likert-based survey (n = 10 participants) and participant interviews (n = 13). Explanatory sequential design was used in the interpretation of the findings.

Findings

The results show that the program had a positive impact on students’ perceptions of themselves as scientists, as well as on their self-efficacy, self-confidence and interpersonal interactions in the research setting.

Practical implications

This strengths-based professional development program demonstrates immense potential as a model to equip students with self-awareness and a new foundation of essential skills needed to supplement their technical and scientific training for their future careers in the team-based workplace.

Originality/value

This study demonstrates how professional development programming can complement scientific training by equipping students with self-awareness and other lifelong skills to navigate feelings of imposter phenomenon and interpersonal relationships in the team-based workplace.

通过基于优势的群组计划促进博士生的专业发展
目的基于优势的职业发展与学术界和组织工作场所的积极成果息息相关。在美国,攻读生物医学博士学位的学生通常都是研究生助教,在这里,他们的培训既有学术部分,又有类似于雇员的生活。担任他们学术和研究指导的人往往是他们的导师,并由导师支付他们的津贴。传统的培训结构带来了独特的挑战,并可能伴随着压力、职业倦怠和冒名顶替现象。本研究的目的是利用以优势为基础的方法,让学生掌握基本的个人和专业技能,从而建立自我意识和自信,为将来进入科研队伍做好准备。该计划旨在为参与者(n = 18)创造一个支持性和包容性的空间,以探索他们作为学生和科学家的身份,并开发和利用他们的才能,使其得到更有效和战略性的利用。计划成果的评估采用了混合方法案例研究设计,使用了计划后基于李克特的调查(n = 10 名参与者)和参与者访谈(n = 13 名参与者)。研究结果表明,该计划对学生作为科学家的自我认知,以及他们在研究环境中的自我效能感、自信心和人际交往产生了积极影响。原创性/价值这项研究展示了职业发展计划如何通过培养学生的自我意识和其他终身技能来补充科学培训,使他们能够在团队工作场所中驾驭冒名顶替现象和人际关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信