An empirical evaluation of link quality utilization in ETX routing for VANETs

IF 3.5 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Raad Al-Qassas, Malik Qasaimeh
{"title":"An empirical evaluation of link quality utilization in ETX routing for VANETs","authors":"Raad Al-Qassas, Malik Qasaimeh","doi":"10.7717/peerj-cs.2259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Routing in vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) enables vehicles to communicate for safety and non-safety applications. However, there are limitations in wireless communication that can degrade VANET performance, so it is crucial to optimize the operation of routing protocols to address this. Various routing protocols employed the expected transmission count (ETX) in their operation as one way to achieve the required efficiency and robustness. ETX is used to estimate link quality for improved route selection. While some studies have evaluated the utilization of ETX in specific protocols, they lack a comprehensive analysis across protocols under varied network conditions. This research provides a comprehensive comparative evaluation of ETX-based routing protocols for VANETs using the nomadic community mobility model. It covers a foundational routing protocol, ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV), as well as newer variants that utilize ETX, lightweight ETX (LETX), and power-based light reverse ETX (PLR-ETX), which are referred to herein as AODV-ETX, AODV-LETX, and AODV-PLR, respectively. The protocols are thoroughly analyzed via ns-3 simulations under different traffic and mobility scenarios. Our evaluation model considers five performance parameters including throughput, routing overhead, end-to-end delay, packet loss, and underutilization ratio. The analysis provides insight into designing robust and adaptive ETX routing for VANET to better serve emerging intelligent transportation system applications through a better understanding of protocol performance under different network conditions. The key findings show that ETX-optimized routing can provide significant performance enhancements in terms of end-to-end delay, throughput, routing overhead, packet loss and underutilization ratio. The extensive simulations demonstrated that AODV-PLR outperforms its counterparts AODV-ETX and AODV-LETX and the foundational AODV routing protocol across the performance metrics.","PeriodicalId":54224,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ Computer Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Routing in vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) enables vehicles to communicate for safety and non-safety applications. However, there are limitations in wireless communication that can degrade VANET performance, so it is crucial to optimize the operation of routing protocols to address this. Various routing protocols employed the expected transmission count (ETX) in their operation as one way to achieve the required efficiency and robustness. ETX is used to estimate link quality for improved route selection. While some studies have evaluated the utilization of ETX in specific protocols, they lack a comprehensive analysis across protocols under varied network conditions. This research provides a comprehensive comparative evaluation of ETX-based routing protocols for VANETs using the nomadic community mobility model. It covers a foundational routing protocol, ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV), as well as newer variants that utilize ETX, lightweight ETX (LETX), and power-based light reverse ETX (PLR-ETX), which are referred to herein as AODV-ETX, AODV-LETX, and AODV-PLR, respectively. The protocols are thoroughly analyzed via ns-3 simulations under different traffic and mobility scenarios. Our evaluation model considers five performance parameters including throughput, routing overhead, end-to-end delay, packet loss, and underutilization ratio. The analysis provides insight into designing robust and adaptive ETX routing for VANET to better serve emerging intelligent transportation system applications through a better understanding of protocol performance under different network conditions. The key findings show that ETX-optimized routing can provide significant performance enhancements in terms of end-to-end delay, throughput, routing overhead, packet loss and underutilization ratio. The extensive simulations demonstrated that AODV-PLR outperforms its counterparts AODV-ETX and AODV-LETX and the foundational AODV routing protocol across the performance metrics.
对 VANET ETX 路由中链路质量利用率的实证评估
车辆特设网络(VANET)中的路由选择使车辆能够为安全和非安全应用进行通信。然而,无线通信的局限性会降低 VANET 的性能,因此优化路由协议的运行以解决这一问题至关重要。各种路由协议在运行中都采用了预期传输数(ETX),以此来达到所需的效率和鲁棒性。ETX 用于估计链路质量,以改进路由选择。虽然有些研究评估了特定协议中 ETX 的使用情况,但缺乏在不同网络条件下对不同协议的全面分析。本研究采用游牧社区移动模型,对基于 ETX 的 VANET 路由协议进行了全面的比较评估。它涵盖了基础路由协议--按需路由矢量(AODV),以及利用 ETX 的新变体、轻量级 ETX(LETX)和基于功率的轻反向 ETX(PLR-ETX),在此分别称为 AODV-ETX、AODV-LETX 和 AODV-PLR。我们通过 ns-3 仿真在不同流量和移动性场景下对这些协议进行了全面分析。我们的评估模型考虑了五个性能参数,包括吞吐量、路由开销、端到端延迟、数据包丢失和利用率不足。通过更好地了解不同网络条件下的协议性能,分析为设计适用于 VANET 的稳健自适应 ETX 路由提供了深入见解,从而更好地服务于新兴的智能交通系统应用。主要研究结果表明,ETX 优化路由可在端到端延迟、吞吐量、路由开销、数据包丢失和利用率不足等方面显著提高性能。大量仿真表明,AODV-PLR 在各项性能指标上都优于其对应的 AODV-ETX 和 AODV-LETX 以及基础 AODV 路由协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PeerJ Computer Science
PeerJ Computer Science Computer Science-General Computer Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ Computer Science is the new open access journal covering all subject areas in computer science, with the backing of a prestigious advisory board and more than 300 academic editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信