EU membership and income inequality: escaping the single and binary treatment approach

IF 1.9 Q2 ECONOMICS
Tomasz Serwach
{"title":"EU membership and income inequality: escaping the single and binary treatment approach","authors":"Tomasz Serwach","doi":"10.1108/jes-04-2024-0280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>In this paper, the impact of the 2004 European Union accession on income inequalities within New Member States is analyzed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>An empirical analysis is conducted with nine New Member States over the period 1991–2015, with 55 economies serving as a control group. The newly introduced (by de Chaisemartin and D’Haultfœuille, 2023) method belonging to the family of difference-in-differences (DID) estimators is applied to allow for multiple non-binary treatments.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>While accession to the European Union had a positive and significant impact on the market and net Gini coefficients in the treated countries, no evidence of the impact of accession on redistribution was found. Single-unit estimates signal that income inequalities rose due to EU membership in some member countries; the most convincing evidence shows that income distribution in Latvia was especially affected.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The author applied the method which addresses the presence of multiple non-binary treatments. Full-fledged membership was preceded by association status, and accession to the EU was accompanied or followed by engagement in other layers of integration (European Monetary Union and Schengen Area). Controlling for these features, the author was able to assess whether the pure EU effect contributed to increases in income inequalities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47604,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-04-2024-0280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

In this paper, the impact of the 2004 European Union accession on income inequalities within New Member States is analyzed.

Design/methodology/approach

An empirical analysis is conducted with nine New Member States over the period 1991–2015, with 55 economies serving as a control group. The newly introduced (by de Chaisemartin and D’Haultfœuille, 2023) method belonging to the family of difference-in-differences (DID) estimators is applied to allow for multiple non-binary treatments.

Findings

While accession to the European Union had a positive and significant impact on the market and net Gini coefficients in the treated countries, no evidence of the impact of accession on redistribution was found. Single-unit estimates signal that income inequalities rose due to EU membership in some member countries; the most convincing evidence shows that income distribution in Latvia was especially affected.

Originality/value

The author applied the method which addresses the presence of multiple non-binary treatments. Full-fledged membership was preceded by association status, and accession to the EU was accompanied or followed by engagement in other layers of integration (European Monetary Union and Schengen Area). Controlling for these features, the author was able to assess whether the pure EU effect contributed to increases in income inequalities.

欧盟成员国资格与收入不平等:摆脱单一和二元处理方法
本文分析了 2004 年加入欧盟对新成员国内部收入不平等的影响。设计/方法/途径对 1991-2015 年期间的 9 个新成员国进行了实证分析,并将 55 个经济体作为对照组。研究结果虽然加入欧盟对所处理国家的市场和净基尼系数产生了积极而显著的影响,但没有发现加入欧盟对再分配产生影响的证据。单个单位估算表明,一些成员国的收入不平等因加入欧盟而加剧;最有说服力的证据表明,拉脱维亚的收入分配尤其受到影响。在成为正式成员之前,拉脱维亚先获得了联系国地位,而在加入欧盟的同时或之后,拉脱维亚还参与了其他层面的一体化进程(欧洲货币联盟和申根地区)。通过对这些特征进行控制,作者能够评估纯粹的欧盟效应是否会导致收入不平等的加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Studies publishes high quality research findings and commentary on international developments in economics. The journal maintains a sound balance between economic theory and application at both the micro and the macro levels. Articles on economic issues between individual nations, emerging and evolving trading blocs are particularly welcomed. Contributors are encouraged to spell out the practical implications of their work for economists in government and industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信