Enhancing experiential science learning with virtual labs: A narrative account of merits, challenges, and implementation strategies

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ronald L. Reyes, Kristina P. Isleta, Jennifer D. Regala, Daisy Mae R. Bialba
{"title":"Enhancing experiential science learning with virtual labs: A narrative account of merits, challenges, and implementation strategies","authors":"Ronald L. Reyes,&nbsp;Kristina P. Isleta,&nbsp;Jennifer D. Regala,&nbsp;Daisy Mae R. Bialba","doi":"10.1111/jcal.13061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The adoption of virtual laboratories (VLs) has experienced a significant surge, catalysed by the global changes in the educational landscape, notably influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Originally supplementary to traditional in-person laboratory experiments, VLs swiftly transitioned into a primary source of hands-on laboratory activities for educational institutions worldwide during the pandemic. As restrictions have eased, virtual, computer-assisted learning platforms continue to be used, though now as a complement to, rather than a substitute for, hands-on experimentation opportunities. However, their adoption presents both opportunities and challenges that require thorough investigation to maximize their effectiveness and equity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of VL resources utilized across various scientific disciplines. It evaluates their potential to enhance traditional hands-on laboratory activities and examines the efficacy of computer-assisted learning platforms from a constructivist learning perspective. By doing so, the study seeks to identify best practices, challenges, and strategies for the effective integration of VLs in science education.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A content analysis was conducted on literature published from 2013 to 2023, focusing on VLs in educational settings. Thematic analysis was employed to categorize the findings into three primary pillars: Merits, Challenges, and Implementation Strategies. Multiple researchers participated in the analysis to ensure reliability and consistency. To further enhance reliability, regular cross-checks and consensus meetings were held to resolve any discrepancies and maintain the integrity of the thematic categorization. A constructivist learning perspective was used to analyse the instructional implications, focusing on active learning to evaluate alignment with educational goals, adapted teaching methods, and assessments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The analysis revealed that VLs offer significant benefits, including enhanced accessibility, flexibility, and opportunities for active learning. Virtual labs provide scalable, safe opportunities for inquiry-based science learning by replicating experiments in an accessible digital environment, enhancing understanding of scientific concepts based on research demonstrations of improved learning outcomes. However, challenges such as high initial setup costs, technological barriers, and the need for effective integration with traditional curricula were also identified. Despite these challenges, VLs have the potential to complement and enhance hands-on laboratory experiences, provided they are implemented thoughtfully and equitably. Future research should focus on improving the efficacy, accessibility, collaboration among stakeholders, and economic feasibility of VLs to maximize their educational impact.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"40 6","pages":"3167-3186"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.13061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The adoption of virtual laboratories (VLs) has experienced a significant surge, catalysed by the global changes in the educational landscape, notably influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Originally supplementary to traditional in-person laboratory experiments, VLs swiftly transitioned into a primary source of hands-on laboratory activities for educational institutions worldwide during the pandemic. As restrictions have eased, virtual, computer-assisted learning platforms continue to be used, though now as a complement to, rather than a substitute for, hands-on experimentation opportunities. However, their adoption presents both opportunities and challenges that require thorough investigation to maximize their effectiveness and equity.

Objectives

This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of VL resources utilized across various scientific disciplines. It evaluates their potential to enhance traditional hands-on laboratory activities and examines the efficacy of computer-assisted learning platforms from a constructivist learning perspective. By doing so, the study seeks to identify best practices, challenges, and strategies for the effective integration of VLs in science education.

Methods

A content analysis was conducted on literature published from 2013 to 2023, focusing on VLs in educational settings. Thematic analysis was employed to categorize the findings into three primary pillars: Merits, Challenges, and Implementation Strategies. Multiple researchers participated in the analysis to ensure reliability and consistency. To further enhance reliability, regular cross-checks and consensus meetings were held to resolve any discrepancies and maintain the integrity of the thematic categorization. A constructivist learning perspective was used to analyse the instructional implications, focusing on active learning to evaluate alignment with educational goals, adapted teaching methods, and assessments.

Results and Conclusions

The analysis revealed that VLs offer significant benefits, including enhanced accessibility, flexibility, and opportunities for active learning. Virtual labs provide scalable, safe opportunities for inquiry-based science learning by replicating experiments in an accessible digital environment, enhancing understanding of scientific concepts based on research demonstrations of improved learning outcomes. However, challenges such as high initial setup costs, technological barriers, and the need for effective integration with traditional curricula were also identified. Despite these challenges, VLs have the potential to complement and enhance hands-on laboratory experiences, provided they are implemented thoughtfully and equitably. Future research should focus on improving the efficacy, accessibility, collaboration among stakeholders, and economic feasibility of VLs to maximize their educational impact.

利用虚拟实验室加强体验式科学学习:叙述优点、挑战和实施策略
背景虚拟实验室(VL)的采用经历了一个显著的高潮,其催化剂是全球教育环境的变化,尤其是受到 COVID-19 大流行病的影响。虚拟实验室最初是传统现场实验室实验的补充,但在大流行病期间迅速转变为全球教育机构动手实验活动的主要来源。随着限制的放宽,虚拟计算机辅助学习平台继续被使用,不过现在是作为动手实验机会的补充,而不是替代。本文旨在全面概述各科学学科所使用的虚拟学习资源。它评估了这些资源在增强传统动手实验活动方面的潜力,并从建构主义学习的角度研究了计算机辅助学习平台的功效。研究对 2013 年至 2023 年发表的文献进行了内容分析,重点关注教育环境中的虚拟实验室。采用主题分析法将研究结果分为三大支柱:优点、挑战和实施策略。多名研究人员参与了分析,以确保可靠性和一致性。为进一步提高可靠性,还定期举行交叉检查和共识会议,以解决任何差异并保持主题分类的完整性。分析表明,虚拟实验室具有显著的优势,包括增强了可访问性、灵活性和主动学习的机会。虚拟实验室通过在可访问的数字环境中复制实验,为以探究为基础的科学学习提供了可扩展的安全机会,在提高学习效果的研究示范基础上增强了对科学概念的理解。然而,虚拟实验室也面临着初始设置成本高、技术障碍以及需要与传统课程有效整合等挑战。尽管存在这些挑战,但只要考虑周全、公平地实施,虚拟实验室仍有潜力补充和加强动手实验经验。未来的研究应侧重于提高虚拟实验室的功效、可及性、利益相关者之间的合作以及经济可行性,以最大限度地发挥其教育影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信