Enhancing Value-at-Risk with Credible Expected Risk Models

IF 2.1 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Khreshna Syuhada, Rizka Puspitasari, I Kadek Darma Arnawa, Lailatul Mufaridho, Elonasari Elonasari, Miftahul Jannah, Aniq Rohmawati
{"title":"Enhancing Value-at-Risk with Credible Expected Risk Models","authors":"Khreshna Syuhada, Rizka Puspitasari, I Kadek Darma Arnawa, Lailatul Mufaridho, Elonasari Elonasari, Miftahul Jannah, Aniq Rohmawati","doi":"10.3390/ijfs12030080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate risk assessment is crucial for predicting potential financial losses. This paper introduces an innovative approach by employing expected risk models that utilize risk samples to capture comprehensive risk characteristics. The innovation lies in the integration of classical credibility theory with expected risk models, enhancing their stability and precision. In this study, two distinct expected risk models were developed, referred to as Model Type I and Model Type II. The Type I model involves independent and identically distributed random samples, while the Type II model incorporates time-varying stochastic processes, including heteroscedastic models like GARCH(p,q). However, these models often exhibit high variability and instability, which can undermine their effectiveness. To mitigate these issues, we applied classical credibility theory, resulting in credible expected risk models. These enhanced models aim to improve the accuracy of Value-at-Risk (VaR) forecasts, a key risk measure defined as the maximum potential loss over a specified period at a given confidence level. The credible expected risk models, referred to as CreVaR, provide more stable and precise VaR forecasts by incorporating credibility adjustments. The effectiveness of these models is evaluated through two complementary approaches: coverage probability, which assesses the accuracy of risk predictions; and scoring functions, which offer a more nuanced evaluation of prediction accuracy by comparing predicted risks with actual observed outcomes. Scoring functions are essential in further assessing the reliability of CreVaR forecasts by quantifying how closely the forecasts align with the actual data, thereby providing a more comprehensive measure of predictive performance. Our findings demonstrate that the CreVaR risk measure delivers more reliable and stable risk forecasts compared to conventional methods. This research contributes to quantitative risk management by offering a robust approach to financial risk prediction, thereby supporting better decision making for companies and financial institutions.","PeriodicalId":45794,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Financial Studies","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Financial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs12030080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate risk assessment is crucial for predicting potential financial losses. This paper introduces an innovative approach by employing expected risk models that utilize risk samples to capture comprehensive risk characteristics. The innovation lies in the integration of classical credibility theory with expected risk models, enhancing their stability and precision. In this study, two distinct expected risk models were developed, referred to as Model Type I and Model Type II. The Type I model involves independent and identically distributed random samples, while the Type II model incorporates time-varying stochastic processes, including heteroscedastic models like GARCH(p,q). However, these models often exhibit high variability and instability, which can undermine their effectiveness. To mitigate these issues, we applied classical credibility theory, resulting in credible expected risk models. These enhanced models aim to improve the accuracy of Value-at-Risk (VaR) forecasts, a key risk measure defined as the maximum potential loss over a specified period at a given confidence level. The credible expected risk models, referred to as CreVaR, provide more stable and precise VaR forecasts by incorporating credibility adjustments. The effectiveness of these models is evaluated through two complementary approaches: coverage probability, which assesses the accuracy of risk predictions; and scoring functions, which offer a more nuanced evaluation of prediction accuracy by comparing predicted risks with actual observed outcomes. Scoring functions are essential in further assessing the reliability of CreVaR forecasts by quantifying how closely the forecasts align with the actual data, thereby providing a more comprehensive measure of predictive performance. Our findings demonstrate that the CreVaR risk measure delivers more reliable and stable risk forecasts compared to conventional methods. This research contributes to quantitative risk management by offering a robust approach to financial risk prediction, thereby supporting better decision making for companies and financial institutions.
利用可信的预期风险模型提高风险价值
准确的风险评估对于预测潜在的财务损失至关重要。本文介绍了一种创新方法,即采用预期风险模型,利用风险样本来捕捉综合风险特征。其创新之处在于将经典可信度理论与预期风险模型相结合,增强了模型的稳定性和精确性。本研究开发了两种不同的预期风险模型,分别称为模型 I 和模型 II。I 类模型涉及独立且同分布的随机样本,而 II 类模型则包含时变随机过程,包括 GARCH(p,q) 等异方差模型。然而,这些模型往往表现出较高的变异性和不稳定性,这可能会削弱其有效性。为了缓解这些问题,我们应用了经典的可信度理论,从而建立了可信的预期风险模型。这些增强型模型旨在提高风险值(VaR)预测的准确性,风险值是一种关键的风险度量,被定义为在给定置信度下特定时期内的最大潜在损失。可信预期风险模型被称为 CreVaR,通过纳入可信度调整,提供更稳定、更精确的风险价值预测。这些模型的有效性通过两种互补方法进行评估:一是覆盖概率,用于评估风险预测的准确性;二是评分函数,通过比较预测风险与实际观察结果,对预测准确性进行更细致的评估。评分函数通过量化预测与实际数据的吻合程度,对进一步评估 CreVaR 预测的可靠性至关重要,从而提供了一个更全面的预测性能衡量标准。我们的研究结果表明,与传统方法相比,CreVaR 风险测量方法能提供更可靠、更稳定的风险预测。这项研究通过提供一种稳健的金融风险预测方法,为量化风险管理做出了贡献,从而为公司和金融机构做出更好的决策提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
100
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信