Breaking the Boundaries in the Digital Age: Open Banking and Tax Evasion

IF 2.1 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Ngoc Thang Dang, Stelios Andreadakis, Pamela Nika, Monomita Nandy
{"title":"Breaking the Boundaries in the Digital Age: Open Banking and Tax Evasion","authors":"Ngoc Thang Dang, Stelios Andreadakis, Pamela Nika, Monomita Nandy","doi":"10.3390/ijfs12030086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we examine the relationship between open banking and tax evasion. As the open banking literature is still evolving, we try to systematically analyze the literature on conventional banking and tax evasion and then extend the discussion in the context of open banking. The popularity of open baking recently raises a question about its relationship with tax evasion. Digital banking and digital taxation contributed positively to mitigating tax evasion in the context of conventional banking. However, in open banking, the customers can decide to what extent they will share any transaction-related data with their bank, while they can also choose to complete direct transactions with third parties. This creates a new challenge in relation to the mitigation of tax evasion, which is the focus of this paper. Due to lack of granular empirical data, we conduct a systematic literature review and a bibliometric analysis to track the development of the relevant academic debates and identify the arguments that have been presented in relation to this topic. This approach is recognized as well suited for emerging topics in finance research, particularly when data are scarce, as evidenced by studies on COVID-19 and biodiversity. We find that the gaps of the current regulatory framework, at both the national and supranational level, have created challenges and uncertainties at multiple levels. Nonetheless, the findings of the study suggest future research directions and offer valuable guidelines for regulators in utilizing open banking.","PeriodicalId":45794,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Financial Studies","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Financial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs12030086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the relationship between open banking and tax evasion. As the open banking literature is still evolving, we try to systematically analyze the literature on conventional banking and tax evasion and then extend the discussion in the context of open banking. The popularity of open baking recently raises a question about its relationship with tax evasion. Digital banking and digital taxation contributed positively to mitigating tax evasion in the context of conventional banking. However, in open banking, the customers can decide to what extent they will share any transaction-related data with their bank, while they can also choose to complete direct transactions with third parties. This creates a new challenge in relation to the mitigation of tax evasion, which is the focus of this paper. Due to lack of granular empirical data, we conduct a systematic literature review and a bibliometric analysis to track the development of the relevant academic debates and identify the arguments that have been presented in relation to this topic. This approach is recognized as well suited for emerging topics in finance research, particularly when data are scarce, as evidenced by studies on COVID-19 and biodiversity. We find that the gaps of the current regulatory framework, at both the national and supranational level, have created challenges and uncertainties at multiple levels. Nonetheless, the findings of the study suggest future research directions and offer valuable guidelines for regulators in utilizing open banking.
打破数字时代的界限:开放银行与逃税
在本文中,我们研究了开放银行与逃税之间的关系。由于开放银行文献仍在不断发展,我们试图系统分析有关传统银行和逃税的文献,然后在开放银行的背景下展开讨论。最近,开放式银行的流行引发了关于其与逃税关系的问题。在传统银行业务中,数字银行和数字税收为减少逃税做出了积极贡献。然而,在开放银行业务中,客户可以决定在多大程度上与银行共享任何与交易相关的数据,同时也可以选择与第三方完成直接交易。这就为减少逃税带来了新的挑战,而这正是本文的重点。由于缺乏详细的实证数据,我们进行了系统的文献综述和文献计量分析,以跟踪相关学术辩论的发展并确定与该主题相关的论点。这种方法被认为非常适合金融研究中的新兴课题,尤其是在数据稀缺的情况下,关于 COVID-19 和生物多样性的研究就是很好的证明。我们发现,国家和超国家层面的现行监管框架存在漏洞,在多个层面造成了挑战和不确定性。尽管如此,研究结果还是提出了未来的研究方向,并为监管机构利用开放银行提供了宝贵的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
100
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信