Exploratory actions as mediators of the association between career exploration self-efficacy and decisional outcomes: Does exploration type matter?

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Margaret M. Nauta
{"title":"Exploratory actions as mediators of the association between career exploration self-efficacy and decisional outcomes: Does exploration type matter?","authors":"Margaret M. Nauta","doi":"10.1177/10384162241263033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study used a short-term longitudinal design to test the social-cognitive model of career self-management's (CSM) theorized pathway in which exploratory actions mediate the association between career exploration self-efficacy and decisional outcomes. The study clarifies the role of exploratory actions in the decision-making process by distinguishing between self-exploration and environmental exploration. College students ( N = 136; 77% female; mean age = 18.71 years [ SD = 1.19]; 47% with undeclared majors) completed an online survey assessing self-efficacy for self-appraisal and self-efficacy for obtaining occupational information. A month later, they reported the frequency of their engagement in self-exploratory and environment-exploratory actions over the past month and completed measures of two decisional outcomes reflecting readiness to make career decisions (vocational identity and need for additional occupational information). The CSM's mediational pathway was supported with respect to self-exploration but not environmental exploration. I discuss implications for the CSM model and for career-development interventions.","PeriodicalId":44843,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Career Development","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Career Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162241263033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study used a short-term longitudinal design to test the social-cognitive model of career self-management's (CSM) theorized pathway in which exploratory actions mediate the association between career exploration self-efficacy and decisional outcomes. The study clarifies the role of exploratory actions in the decision-making process by distinguishing between self-exploration and environmental exploration. College students ( N = 136; 77% female; mean age = 18.71 years [ SD = 1.19]; 47% with undeclared majors) completed an online survey assessing self-efficacy for self-appraisal and self-efficacy for obtaining occupational information. A month later, they reported the frequency of their engagement in self-exploratory and environment-exploratory actions over the past month and completed measures of two decisional outcomes reflecting readiness to make career decisions (vocational identity and need for additional occupational information). The CSM's mediational pathway was supported with respect to self-exploration but not environmental exploration. I discuss implications for the CSM model and for career-development interventions.
探索行动是职业探索自我效能感与决策结果之间关系的中介:探索类型重要吗?
本研究采用短期纵向设计来检验职业生涯自我管理的社会认知模型(CSM)的理论路径,在该路径中,探索行动是职业探索自我效能感与决策结果之间联系的中介。本研究通过区分自我探索和环境探索,明确了探索行动在决策过程中的作用。大学生(N = 136;77% 为女性;平均年龄 = 18.71 岁 [ SD = 1.19];47% 未确定专业)完成了一项在线调查,评估自我评价的自我效能感和获取职业信息的自我效能感。一个月后,他们报告了过去一个月中参与自我探索和环境探索行动的频率,并完成了反映职业决策准备情况的两个决策结果(职业认同和对更多职业信息的需求)的测量。CSM 的中介途径在自我探索方面得到了支持,但在环境探索方面没有得到支持。我将讨论 CSM 模型和职业发展干预措施的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信