High-intensity focused ultrasound in treatment of primary breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sogol Alikarami, Hamid Harandi, Ali Jahanshahi, Seyed Sina Zakavi, Negin Frounchi, Mehrdad Mahalleh, Sarah Momtazmanesh
{"title":"High-intensity focused ultrasound in treatment of primary breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Sogol Alikarami, Hamid Harandi, Ali Jahanshahi, Seyed Sina Zakavi, Negin Frounchi, Mehrdad Mahalleh, Sarah Momtazmanesh","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.10.24313423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In recent years, the tumor management strategies have focused on less invasive methods, aiming to yield optimal efficacy while minimizing further complications and enhancing the overall outcome of patients. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), a known thermal ablative technique, has shown promising results in breast cancer treatment. Therefore, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinical, histopathologic, immunologic, and radiologic outcomes of HIFU ablative therapy and its complications in patients with primary breast cancer.\nMethods: We searched PubMed and Scopus databases to identify the eligible articles. Data extraction was conducted by two independent authors. A random effect model was employed to pool the proportion of remaining tumor after HIFU therapy in breast cancer. Pooled CD4/CD8 ratio mean difference between HIFU and radical mastectomy was ,measured using a fixed effect model. Results: We included 26 studies and 677 participants in the systematic review. Tumor necrosis rates varied, with 4 studies reporting less than 50% complete necrosis and 5 more than 50%. Two studies observed HIFU-induced disturbances in microvasculature of the targeted tissue. Six noted no contrast enhancement in successfully treated areas, two observed a thin rim indicating necrosis or fibrosis, and four reported a persistent enhancement in MRI images associated with a residual viable tumor. The weighted proportion of patients with residual tumor was 58.45 (95% C: 45.48, 71.42). The CD4/CD8 ratio was higher in the HIFU group, with a weighted mean difference of 0.6 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.78). The most prevalent side effects were pain (47.14%) and skin burn (2.59%).\nConclusions: HIFU is a relatively safe procedure for treatment of breast cancer as an independent or conjugated therapy and its effectiveness is promising regarding histopathological response, immunological reactivity, and vascular damage in the targeted area.","PeriodicalId":501437,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Oncology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.10.24313423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years, the tumor management strategies have focused on less invasive methods, aiming to yield optimal efficacy while minimizing further complications and enhancing the overall outcome of patients. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), a known thermal ablative technique, has shown promising results in breast cancer treatment. Therefore, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinical, histopathologic, immunologic, and radiologic outcomes of HIFU ablative therapy and its complications in patients with primary breast cancer. Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus databases to identify the eligible articles. Data extraction was conducted by two independent authors. A random effect model was employed to pool the proportion of remaining tumor after HIFU therapy in breast cancer. Pooled CD4/CD8 ratio mean difference between HIFU and radical mastectomy was ,measured using a fixed effect model. Results: We included 26 studies and 677 participants in the systematic review. Tumor necrosis rates varied, with 4 studies reporting less than 50% complete necrosis and 5 more than 50%. Two studies observed HIFU-induced disturbances in microvasculature of the targeted tissue. Six noted no contrast enhancement in successfully treated areas, two observed a thin rim indicating necrosis or fibrosis, and four reported a persistent enhancement in MRI images associated with a residual viable tumor. The weighted proportion of patients with residual tumor was 58.45 (95% C: 45.48, 71.42). The CD4/CD8 ratio was higher in the HIFU group, with a weighted mean difference of 0.6 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.78). The most prevalent side effects were pain (47.14%) and skin burn (2.59%). Conclusions: HIFU is a relatively safe procedure for treatment of breast cancer as an independent or conjugated therapy and its effectiveness is promising regarding histopathological response, immunological reactivity, and vascular damage in the targeted area.
高强度聚焦超声治疗原发性乳腺癌:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:近年来,肿瘤治疗策略主要集中在微创方法上,目的是在取得最佳疗效的同时,最大限度地减少并发症,提高患者的整体疗效。高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)是一种已知的热消融技术,在乳腺癌治疗中显示出良好的效果。因此,我们进行了这项系统综述和荟萃分析,以评估 HIFU 消融疗法在原发性乳腺癌患者中的临床、组织病理学、免疫学和放射学结果及其并发症:我们检索了 PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库,以确定符合条件的文章。数据提取由两位独立作者完成。采用随机效应模型对乳腺癌 HIFU 治疗后剩余肿瘤的比例进行汇总。采用固定效应模型测量了HIFU与根治性乳房切除术之间的CD4/CD8比值平均差异。研究结果我们在系统综述中纳入了 26 项研究和 677 名参与者。肿瘤坏死率各不相同,4 项研究报告的肿瘤完全坏死率低于 50%,5 项报告的肿瘤坏死率超过 50%。两项研究观察到 HIFU 引起的靶组织微血管紊乱。六项研究注意到成功治疗区域无对比度增强,两项研究观察到一薄层边缘显示坏死或纤维化,四项研究报告 MRI 图像持续增强,与残留的存活肿瘤有关。残留肿瘤患者的加权比例为 58.45(95% C:45.48,71.42)。HIFU 组的 CD4/CD8 比率较高,加权平均差为 0.6(95% CI:0.41,0.78)。最常见的副作用是疼痛(47.14%)和皮肤灼伤(2.59%):HIFU是一种相对安全的乳腺癌独立或联合治疗方法,在组织病理学反应、免疫反应和靶区血管损伤方面疗效显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信