‘We kept having this internal conflict around the language of handout and hand-up’: independent living philosophy and rural disability services during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Rayna Sage, Krys Standley, Lillie Greiman, Genna M Mashinchi, Mary Willard
{"title":"‘We kept having this internal conflict around the language of handout and hand-up’: independent living philosophy and rural disability services during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Rayna Sage, Krys Standley, Lillie Greiman, Genna M Mashinchi, Mary Willard","doi":"10.1093/cdj/bsae043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, Centers for Independent Living (CILs) staff were at the frontlines of responding to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rural people with disabilities. Growing out of the Independent Living (IL) Movement , CILs emphasize independence, autonomy, choice, and control for disabled people and do not typically have financial or other resources to give away. To better understand the experiences of CIL staff in using the CARES Act monies and serving rural people with disabilities, researchers at the Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities in collaboration with the Association for Programs in Rural Independent Living (APRIL) used thematic coding to analyze the transcripts of eight national online peer support meetings that were facilitated by APRIL. We found CIL staff described distributing financial assistance to cover essential household needs such as rent, utilities, internet access, and various items. In turn, they also shared that they grappled with conflicts created by the influx of CARES Act funding, which put CIL staff in the position of providing what some described as ‘handouts’ rather than CILs’ usual work of providing consumers with a ‘hand-up’ through training and other non-financial supports. This project highlights a unique challenge CIL staff faced as they attempted to stay true to IL philosophy while concurrently meeting the needs of rural people with disabilities in crisis during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":47329,"journal":{"name":"Community Development Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsae043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the United States, Centers for Independent Living (CILs) staff were at the frontlines of responding to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rural people with disabilities. Growing out of the Independent Living (IL) Movement , CILs emphasize independence, autonomy, choice, and control for disabled people and do not typically have financial or other resources to give away. To better understand the experiences of CIL staff in using the CARES Act monies and serving rural people with disabilities, researchers at the Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities in collaboration with the Association for Programs in Rural Independent Living (APRIL) used thematic coding to analyze the transcripts of eight national online peer support meetings that were facilitated by APRIL. We found CIL staff described distributing financial assistance to cover essential household needs such as rent, utilities, internet access, and various items. In turn, they also shared that they grappled with conflicts created by the influx of CARES Act funding, which put CIL staff in the position of providing what some described as ‘handouts’ rather than CILs’ usual work of providing consumers with a ‘hand-up’ through training and other non-financial supports. This project highlights a unique challenge CIL staff faced as they attempted to stay true to IL philosophy while concurrently meeting the needs of rural people with disabilities in crisis during the pandemic.
我们一直在围绕'施舍'和'帮助'的语言发生内部冲突":COVID-19 大流行期间的独立生活理念和农村残疾人服务
在美国,独立生活中心(CILs)的工作人员站在第一线,应对 COVID-19 对农村残疾人的影响。独立生活中心(CILs)由独立生活运动(IL)发展而来,强调残疾人的独立性、自主性、选择性和控制性,通常不提供资金或其他资源。为了更好地了解 CIL 工作人员在使用 CARES 法案资金和服务农村残疾人方面的经验,农村包容性社区研究所(Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities)的研究人员与农村独立生活项目协会(APRIL)合作,使用主题编码法分析了由 APRIL 主持的八次全国性在线同伴支持会议的记录。我们发现,CIL 的工作人员描述了发放经济援助以满足基本家庭需求的情况,如房租、水电、上网和各种物品。反过来,他们也分享说,他们也在努力解决《加州康复和社会服务法案》(CARES Act)资金大量涌入所造成的冲突,这使得社区生活和学习中心的工作人员不得不提供一些人所说的 "施舍",而不是社区生活和学习中心通常通过培训和其他非经济支持为消费者提供 "帮助 "的工作。该项目凸显了 CIL 工作人员所面临的独特挑战,他们既要坚持 IL 的理念,又要在大流行病期间满足处于危机中的农村残疾人的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community Development Journal
Community Development Journal DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Since 1966 the leading international journal in its field, covering a wide range of topics, reviewing significant developments and providing a forum for cutting-edge debates about theory and practice. It adopts a broad definition of community development to include policy, planning and action as they impact on the life of communities. We particularly seek to publish critically focused articles which challenge received wisdom, report and discuss innovative practices, and relate issues of community development to questions of social justice, diversity and environmental sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信