Avimita Chatterjee, Sonny Rappaport, Anish Giri, Sonika Johri, Timothy Proctor, David E. Bernal Neira, Pratik Sathe, Thomas Lubinski
{"title":"A Comprehensive Cross-Model Framework for Benchmarking the Performance of Quantum Hamiltonian Simulations","authors":"Avimita Chatterjee, Sonny Rappaport, Anish Giri, Sonika Johri, Timothy Proctor, David E. Bernal Neira, Pratik Sathe, Thomas Lubinski","doi":"arxiv-2409.06919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantum Hamiltonian simulation is one of the most promising applications of\nquantum computing and forms the basis for many quantum algorithms. Benchmarking\nthem is an important gauge of progress in quantum computing technology. We\npresent a methodology and software framework to evaluate various facets of the\nperformance of gate-based quantum computers on Trotterized quantum Hamiltonian\nevolution. We propose three distinct modes for benchmarking: (i) comparing\nsimulation on a real device to that on a noiseless classical simulator, (ii)\ncomparing simulation on a real device with exact diagonalization results, and\n(iii) using scalable mirror circuit techniques to assess hardware performance\nin scenarios beyond classical simulation methods. We demonstrate this framework\non five Hamiltonian models from the HamLib library: the Fermi and Bose-Hubbard\nmodels, the transverse field Ising model, the Heisenberg model, and the Max3SAT\nproblem. Experiments were conducted using Qiskit's Aer simulator, BlueQubit's\nCPU cluster and GPU simulators, and IBM's quantum hardware. Our framework,\nextendable to other Hamiltonians, provides comprehensive performance profiles\nthat reveal hardware and algorithmic limitations and measure both fidelity and\nexecution times, identifying crossover points where quantum hardware\noutperforms CPU/GPU simulators.","PeriodicalId":501226,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Quantum Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Quantum Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Quantum Hamiltonian simulation is one of the most promising applications of
quantum computing and forms the basis for many quantum algorithms. Benchmarking
them is an important gauge of progress in quantum computing technology. We
present a methodology and software framework to evaluate various facets of the
performance of gate-based quantum computers on Trotterized quantum Hamiltonian
evolution. We propose three distinct modes for benchmarking: (i) comparing
simulation on a real device to that on a noiseless classical simulator, (ii)
comparing simulation on a real device with exact diagonalization results, and
(iii) using scalable mirror circuit techniques to assess hardware performance
in scenarios beyond classical simulation methods. We demonstrate this framework
on five Hamiltonian models from the HamLib library: the Fermi and Bose-Hubbard
models, the transverse field Ising model, the Heisenberg model, and the Max3SAT
problem. Experiments were conducted using Qiskit's Aer simulator, BlueQubit's
CPU cluster and GPU simulators, and IBM's quantum hardware. Our framework,
extendable to other Hamiltonians, provides comprehensive performance profiles
that reveal hardware and algorithmic limitations and measure both fidelity and
execution times, identifying crossover points where quantum hardware
outperforms CPU/GPU simulators.