Potentially inappropriate prescribing in polymedicated older adults with atrial fibrillation and multimorbidity: a Swedish national register-based cohort study

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Cheima Amrouch, Davide Liborio Vetrano, Cecilia Damiano, Lu Dai, Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga, Maxim Grymonprez, Marco Proietti, Gregory Y. H. Lip, Søren P. Johnsen, Jonas W. Wastesson, Kristina Johnell, Delphine De Smedt, Mirko Petrovic
{"title":"Potentially inappropriate prescribing in polymedicated older adults with atrial fibrillation and multimorbidity: a Swedish national register-based cohort study","authors":"Cheima Amrouch, Davide Liborio Vetrano, Cecilia Damiano, Lu Dai, Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga, Maxim Grymonprez, Marco Proietti, Gregory Y. H. Lip, Søren P. Johnsen, Jonas W. Wastesson, Kristina Johnell, Delphine De Smedt, Mirko Petrovic","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2024.1476464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionCurrent research on potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in polymedicated older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) and multimorbidity is predominantly focused on PIP of oral anticoagulants (OAC). Our study aimed to assess (i) the overall prevalence of PIP in older multimorbid adults with AF, (ii) potential associated factors of PIP, and (iii) the association of PIP with adverse health outcomes in a nationwide sample of Swedish older adults.MethodsSwedish national registries were linked to establish a cohort with a 2-year follow-up of older adults (≥65y) who, on 1 January 2017, had a diagnosis of AF and had at least one comorbidity (n = 203,042). PIP was assessed using the reduced STOPP/START version 2 screening tool. The STOPP criteria identify potentially inappropriate prescribed medications (PIM), while the START criteria identify potential prescribing omissions (PPO). PIP is identified as having at least one PIM and/or PPO. Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between PIP and adverse health outcomes: mortality, hospitalisation, stroke, bleeding, and falls.ResultsPIP was highly prevalent in older adults with AF, with both polypharmacy (69.6%) and excessive polypharmacy (85.9%). In the study population, benzodiazepines (22.9%), hypnotic Z-medications (17.8%) and analgesics (8.7%) were the most frequent PIM. Anticoagulants (34.3%), statins (11.1%), vitamin D and calcium (13.4%) were the most frequent PPO. Demographic factors and polypharmacy were associated with different PIM and PPO categories, with the nature of these associations differing based on the specific type of PIM and PPO. The co-occurrence of PIM and PPO, compared to appropriate prescribing, was associated with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes compared to all appropriately prescribed medications: cardiovascular (CV) (Hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval] = 1.97 [1.88–2.07]) and overall mortality (HR = 2.09 [2.03–2.16]), CV (HR = 1.34 [1.30–1.37]) and overall hospitalisation (HR = 1.48 [1.46–1.51]), stroke (HR = 1.93 [1.78–2.10]), bleeding (HR = 1.10 [1.01–1.21]), and falls (HR = 1.63 [1.56–1.71]).ConclusionThe present study reports a high prevalence of PIP in multimorbid polymedicated older adults with AF. Additionally, a nuanced relationship between prescribing patterns, patient characteristics, and adverse health outcomes was observed. These findings emphasise the importance of implementing tailored interventions to optimise medication management in this patient population.","PeriodicalId":12491,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1476464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionCurrent research on potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in polymedicated older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) and multimorbidity is predominantly focused on PIP of oral anticoagulants (OAC). Our study aimed to assess (i) the overall prevalence of PIP in older multimorbid adults with AF, (ii) potential associated factors of PIP, and (iii) the association of PIP with adverse health outcomes in a nationwide sample of Swedish older adults.MethodsSwedish national registries were linked to establish a cohort with a 2-year follow-up of older adults (≥65y) who, on 1 January 2017, had a diagnosis of AF and had at least one comorbidity (n = 203,042). PIP was assessed using the reduced STOPP/START version 2 screening tool. The STOPP criteria identify potentially inappropriate prescribed medications (PIM), while the START criteria identify potential prescribing omissions (PPO). PIP is identified as having at least one PIM and/or PPO. Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between PIP and adverse health outcomes: mortality, hospitalisation, stroke, bleeding, and falls.ResultsPIP was highly prevalent in older adults with AF, with both polypharmacy (69.6%) and excessive polypharmacy (85.9%). In the study population, benzodiazepines (22.9%), hypnotic Z-medications (17.8%) and analgesics (8.7%) were the most frequent PIM. Anticoagulants (34.3%), statins (11.1%), vitamin D and calcium (13.4%) were the most frequent PPO. Demographic factors and polypharmacy were associated with different PIM and PPO categories, with the nature of these associations differing based on the specific type of PIM and PPO. The co-occurrence of PIM and PPO, compared to appropriate prescribing, was associated with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes compared to all appropriately prescribed medications: cardiovascular (CV) (Hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval] = 1.97 [1.88–2.07]) and overall mortality (HR = 2.09 [2.03–2.16]), CV (HR = 1.34 [1.30–1.37]) and overall hospitalisation (HR = 1.48 [1.46–1.51]), stroke (HR = 1.93 [1.78–2.10]), bleeding (HR = 1.10 [1.01–1.21]), and falls (HR = 1.63 [1.56–1.71]).ConclusionThe present study reports a high prevalence of PIP in multimorbid polymedicated older adults with AF. Additionally, a nuanced relationship between prescribing patterns, patient characteristics, and adverse health outcomes was observed. These findings emphasise the importance of implementing tailored interventions to optimise medication management in this patient population.
对患有心房颤动和多病的老年人可能开出的不当处方:一项基于瑞典国家登记册的队列研究
导言:目前对患有心房颤动(房颤)和多病共患的多药老年人的潜在不当处方(PIP)的研究主要集中在口服抗凝药(OAC)的 PIP 上。我们的研究旨在评估(i)患有房颤的多病老年人中 PIP 的总体患病率,(ii)PIP 的潜在相关因素,以及(iii)在全国范围内抽样调查的瑞典老年人中,PIP 与不良健康结果之间的关联。方法将瑞典国家登记处连接起来,建立了一个随访 2 年的老年人队列(≥65 岁),这些老年人在 2017 年 1 月 1 日确诊为房颤,并至少患有一种并发症(n = 203042)。PIP使用简化版STOPP/START第2版筛查工具进行评估。STOPP 标准确定潜在的处方用药不当 (PIM),而 START 标准则确定潜在的处方遗漏 (PPO)。PIP 指至少有一种 PIM 和/或 PPO。结果PIP在患有房颤的老年人中非常普遍,多药(69.6%)和过度多药(85.9%)都有。在研究人群中,苯二氮卓类药物(22.9%)、催眠 Z 类药物(17.8%)和镇痛药(8.7%)是最常见的 PIM。抗凝药(34.3%)、他汀类药物(11.1%)、维生素 D 和钙(13.4%)是最常见的 PPO。人口统计学因素和多重用药与不同的 PIM 和 PPO 类别有关,这些关联的性质因 PIM 和 PPO 的具体类型而异。与合理用药相比,同时出现 PIM 和 PPO 与不良健康后果的风险增加有关:心血管(CV)(危险比 (HR) [95% 置信区间] = 1.97 [1.88-2.07])和总体死亡率(HR = 2.09 [2.本研究报告了多病多药老年房颤患者中 PIP 的高患病率。此外,还观察到处方模式、患者特征和不良健康后果之间存在微妙的关系。这些发现强调了在这一患者群体中实施有针对性的干预措施以优化用药管理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers in Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
5163
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信