Sarah Nargiso,Mary Lo,Leyda Ramos,Amarilis Bolaños,Evelyn Lee,Linda Sher
{"title":"PAs and NPs in liver transplantation: Perceptions, implementation, and effect.","authors":"Sarah Nargiso,Mary Lo,Leyda Ramos,Amarilis Bolaños,Evelyn Lee,Linda Sher","doi":"10.1097/01.jaa.0000000000000125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\r\nThis study assessed the use and perceptions of physician associates/assistants (PAs) and NPs at liver transplant centers and sought to determine their financial effect.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nLeaders of liver transplant programs performing 25 or more transplants in 2020 were contacted to complete an 11-question survey about the role and effect of PAs and NPs in liver transplant. A single-center retrospective analysis compared length of stay (LOS) and readmission rates for primary liver transplants and simultaneous liver-kidney transplants before and after a dedicated PA team was established. Chi-square and t-test analyses were performed.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe survey achieved a 77% response rate, and 98% of institutions reported using PAs and NPs. The single-center study found the mean LOS post-transplant was significantly shorter in the post-PA cohort (P = .0005). No significant difference was found in 30-day readmission rates.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nPAs and NPs are used broadly across the post-liver transplant care continuum. Using LOS as a surrogate financial marker suggests that a dedicated PA and NP team may contribute to cost savings.","PeriodicalId":519966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jaa.0000000000000125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
This study assessed the use and perceptions of physician associates/assistants (PAs) and NPs at liver transplant centers and sought to determine their financial effect.
METHODS
Leaders of liver transplant programs performing 25 or more transplants in 2020 were contacted to complete an 11-question survey about the role and effect of PAs and NPs in liver transplant. A single-center retrospective analysis compared length of stay (LOS) and readmission rates for primary liver transplants and simultaneous liver-kidney transplants before and after a dedicated PA team was established. Chi-square and t-test analyses were performed.
RESULTS
The survey achieved a 77% response rate, and 98% of institutions reported using PAs and NPs. The single-center study found the mean LOS post-transplant was significantly shorter in the post-PA cohort (P = .0005). No significant difference was found in 30-day readmission rates.
CONCLUSIONS
PAs and NPs are used broadly across the post-liver transplant care continuum. Using LOS as a surrogate financial marker suggests that a dedicated PA and NP team may contribute to cost savings.
目的:本研究评估了肝移植中心对医生助理/助手(PA)和护士(NP)的使用情况和看法,并试图确定他们的财务影响。方法:我们联系了2020年进行25例或更多移植手术的肝移植项目的负责人,让他们完成一项包含11个问题的调查,内容涉及PA和NP在肝移植中的作用和影响。一项单中心回顾性分析比较了在建立专门的PA团队之前和之后,初次肝移植和同时进行的肝肾移植的住院时间(LOS)和再入院率。结果调查的回复率为77%,98%的机构报告使用了PA和NP。这项单中心研究发现,PA 后队列的移植后平均住院日明显缩短(P = 0.0005)。结论肝移植术后护理过程中广泛使用PA和NP。将 LOS 作为替代财务指标表明,专门的 PA 和 NP 团队可能有助于节约成本。