{"title":"Charting the Exoskeleton Industry: A Comprehensive Insight into Dynamics and Trends","authors":"M I Al-Khiami, S M Lindhard, S Wandahl","doi":"10.1088/1755-1315/1389/1/012014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) emerge amongst the main causes of early retirement, absenteeism, and loss of productivity in construction and broader industrial sectors, particularly due to repetitive and challenging tasks performed by workers often in non-optimal postures. The situation presses the industrial sector towards a paradigm shift in its traditional practices promoting social sustainability. Exoskeletons, devices designed to support the human body during work, are considered a prominent technology in mitigating WMSDs. Recognizing their potential, necessitates a thorough examination of the current landscape of exoskeleton production. A descriptive methodological approach, encompassing a review of industry reports, academic literature, and market analysis was conducted. The findings have revealed 132 distinct exoskeleton models distributed across 22 countries amongst 72 companies and a growing interest in exoskeleton manufacturing. Notably, 33% of the exoskeleton models targets the healthcare sector while 66% targets the industrial sector. Though, the industrial sector is more diversified, including various sub-sectors, of which the percentage of models none exceeding 16%. Despite 14% of the models claiming support for the construction sector, all are broadly applicable and not specifically tailored to its unique demands. This is also true to other sub-sectors. Additionally, most of the exoskeleton models are designed to support the back, followed by the upper extremities. These findings emphasize the need for sector-specific exoskeleton solutions to enhance worker safety and productivity, thereby supporting the transition towards socially sustainable industrial practices. It also allows for manufacturers to gain a consensus of the market and identify the gaps needed within this technology.","PeriodicalId":14556,"journal":{"name":"IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1389/1/012014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) emerge amongst the main causes of early retirement, absenteeism, and loss of productivity in construction and broader industrial sectors, particularly due to repetitive and challenging tasks performed by workers often in non-optimal postures. The situation presses the industrial sector towards a paradigm shift in its traditional practices promoting social sustainability. Exoskeletons, devices designed to support the human body during work, are considered a prominent technology in mitigating WMSDs. Recognizing their potential, necessitates a thorough examination of the current landscape of exoskeleton production. A descriptive methodological approach, encompassing a review of industry reports, academic literature, and market analysis was conducted. The findings have revealed 132 distinct exoskeleton models distributed across 22 countries amongst 72 companies and a growing interest in exoskeleton manufacturing. Notably, 33% of the exoskeleton models targets the healthcare sector while 66% targets the industrial sector. Though, the industrial sector is more diversified, including various sub-sectors, of which the percentage of models none exceeding 16%. Despite 14% of the models claiming support for the construction sector, all are broadly applicable and not specifically tailored to its unique demands. This is also true to other sub-sectors. Additionally, most of the exoskeleton models are designed to support the back, followed by the upper extremities. These findings emphasize the need for sector-specific exoskeleton solutions to enhance worker safety and productivity, thereby supporting the transition towards socially sustainable industrial practices. It also allows for manufacturers to gain a consensus of the market and identify the gaps needed within this technology.