LCA-based strategic evaluation for building renovation construction projects

Marco Alvise Bragadin, Mattia Calistri, Giorgia Predari
{"title":"LCA-based strategic evaluation for building renovation construction projects","authors":"Marco Alvise Bragadin, Mattia Calistri, Giorgia Predari","doi":"10.1088/1755-1315/1389/1/012001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that the existing building stock needs performance upgrades related to energy retrofit. In Italy and many European countries seismic structural safety standards requirements are also increasing, and therefore together with other renovation works, a structural rehabilitation is always needed. Structural rehabilitation is generally an invasive intervention on the structural sub-system, while energy redevelopment is less invasive as it is mostly performed in the building envelope, but it is economically relevant. Therefore, the high renovation costs and the limitation of the usability of the building during a renovation project often lead real estate developers to choose the easier strategy of complete demolition and reconstruction. This can be, perhaps, the easiest choice but, from an environmental and economic point of view, usually the least sustainable one. Environmental sustainability can be evaluated via the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, but LCA needs a complete evaluation of the existing and new building systems, sub-systems and components. Therefore, the strategic choice based upon LCA can usually be performed only late in the design process, when most of the technologic systems have been designed in detail. A parametric preliminary evaluation can help project managers and real estate developers to choose the most environmentally sustainable design alternative, even with a low level of knowledge of the existing building. The proposed approach uses a list of parametric costs for a building type to extract preliminary data about building quantities. Therefore, a mixed method that uses typical cost plans and existing LCA database is proposed to perform the preliminary LCA analysis of a building renovation project and evaluate sustainability.","PeriodicalId":14556,"journal":{"name":"IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1389/1/012001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well known that the existing building stock needs performance upgrades related to energy retrofit. In Italy and many European countries seismic structural safety standards requirements are also increasing, and therefore together with other renovation works, a structural rehabilitation is always needed. Structural rehabilitation is generally an invasive intervention on the structural sub-system, while energy redevelopment is less invasive as it is mostly performed in the building envelope, but it is economically relevant. Therefore, the high renovation costs and the limitation of the usability of the building during a renovation project often lead real estate developers to choose the easier strategy of complete demolition and reconstruction. This can be, perhaps, the easiest choice but, from an environmental and economic point of view, usually the least sustainable one. Environmental sustainability can be evaluated via the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, but LCA needs a complete evaluation of the existing and new building systems, sub-systems and components. Therefore, the strategic choice based upon LCA can usually be performed only late in the design process, when most of the technologic systems have been designed in detail. A parametric preliminary evaluation can help project managers and real estate developers to choose the most environmentally sustainable design alternative, even with a low level of knowledge of the existing building. The proposed approach uses a list of parametric costs for a building type to extract preliminary data about building quantities. Therefore, a mixed method that uses typical cost plans and existing LCA database is proposed to perform the preliminary LCA analysis of a building renovation project and evaluate sustainability.
基于生命周期评估的建筑翻新施工项目战略评估
众所周知,现有建筑需要进行与节能改造相关的性能升级。在意大利和许多欧洲国家,抗震结构安全标准的要求也在不断提高,因此在进行其他翻新工程的同时,总是需要进行结构改造。结构修复通常是对结构子系统的侵入性干预,而能源再开发的侵入性较小,因为它主要是在建筑围护结构中进行的,但却具有经济意义。因此,高昂的翻新成本和翻新项目期间建筑物可用性的限制,往往导致房地产开发商选择更简单的策略,即彻底拆除和重建。这也许是最简单的选择,但从环境和经济的角度来看,通常是最缺乏可持续性的选择。环境可持续性可以通过生命周期评估(LCA)方法进行评估,但生命周期评估需要对现有的和新的建筑系统、子系统和组件进行全面评估。因此,基于生命周期评估的战略选择通常只能在设计过程的后期进行,即大部分技术系统已经详细设计完毕。参数化初步评估可以帮助项目经理和房地产开发商选择最具环境可持续性的设计方案,即使他们对现有建筑的了解程度很低。建议的方法使用建筑类型的参数成本清单来提取有关建筑数量的初步数据。因此,我们提出了一种使用典型成本计划和现有生命周期评估数据库的混合方法,对建筑改造项目进行初步生命周期评估分析,并评估可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信