Effect of Hospital-to-Home Transitional Care for COPD on Patient-Centered Outcomes.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Yukyung Park,Woo Jin Kim,Seon Sook Han,Yeon Jeong Heo,Da Hye Moon,Ohbeom Kwon,Myung Goo Lee,Ji Young Hong,Chang Youl Lee,Yu Seong Hwang,Su Kyoung Kim,Heui Sug Jo
{"title":"Effect of Hospital-to-Home Transitional Care for COPD on Patient-Centered Outcomes.","authors":"Yukyung Park,Woo Jin Kim,Seon Sook Han,Yeon Jeong Heo,Da Hye Moon,Ohbeom Kwon,Myung Goo Lee,Ji Young Hong,Chang Youl Lee,Yu Seong Hwang,Su Kyoung Kim,Heui Sug Jo","doi":"10.4187/respcare.11924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nAppropriate hospital-to-home transitional care has been recognized for its positive impact on health care usage and health outcomes in patients with COPD. However, there is limited research assessing its effects on patient-centered outcomes, focusing on patient symptoms and experiences.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis single-blind randomized controlled trial included subjects diagnosed with COPD at one of 2 university hospitals in South Korea. The study included 179 subjects (transitional care group [transitional care], 87; usual care group [usual care], 92). The transitional care received transitional care comprising post-discharge care planning, personalized education, breathing exercises, telephone counseling, home visits, and referral to social services. We analyzed the effects of these interventions by comparing breathing symptoms and various patient-centered outcomes between the 2 groups.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe Modified Medical Research Council scores (mean [SD], transitional care 1.3 [1.06], usual care 1.82 [1.1], P = .002) and COPD Assessment Test scores (transitional care 6.32 [5.5], usual care 9.43 [7.16], P = .001) in the intervention group demonstrated more significant improvement than did those in the usual care. Following intervention, the subjects exhibited enhanced awareness of their disease, an increased frequency of inhaler use (transitional care 49.69 [1.67], usual care 46.86 [7.92], P = .002), and lower depression and anxiety scores. Additionally, the transitional care outperformed the usual care in the domain of subject experience during hospitalization (transitional care 39.34 [6.14], usual care 37.5 [5.61], P = .036), preparedness before discharge (transitional care 34.54 [4.96], usual care 32.3 [5.09], P = .003), and post-discharge management (transitional care 34.72 [4.36], usual care 30.29 [4.26], P = .003).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nEvidence-based transitional care services can exert positive effects on patient-centered indices. Our findings can be used as evidence of the need to establish patient-centered transitional care as a form of universal care for patients with COPD.","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":"165 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11924","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Appropriate hospital-to-home transitional care has been recognized for its positive impact on health care usage and health outcomes in patients with COPD. However, there is limited research assessing its effects on patient-centered outcomes, focusing on patient symptoms and experiences. METHODS This single-blind randomized controlled trial included subjects diagnosed with COPD at one of 2 university hospitals in South Korea. The study included 179 subjects (transitional care group [transitional care], 87; usual care group [usual care], 92). The transitional care received transitional care comprising post-discharge care planning, personalized education, breathing exercises, telephone counseling, home visits, and referral to social services. We analyzed the effects of these interventions by comparing breathing symptoms and various patient-centered outcomes between the 2 groups. RESULTS The Modified Medical Research Council scores (mean [SD], transitional care 1.3 [1.06], usual care 1.82 [1.1], P = .002) and COPD Assessment Test scores (transitional care 6.32 [5.5], usual care 9.43 [7.16], P = .001) in the intervention group demonstrated more significant improvement than did those in the usual care. Following intervention, the subjects exhibited enhanced awareness of their disease, an increased frequency of inhaler use (transitional care 49.69 [1.67], usual care 46.86 [7.92], P = .002), and lower depression and anxiety scores. Additionally, the transitional care outperformed the usual care in the domain of subject experience during hospitalization (transitional care 39.34 [6.14], usual care 37.5 [5.61], P = .036), preparedness before discharge (transitional care 34.54 [4.96], usual care 32.3 [5.09], P = .003), and post-discharge management (transitional care 34.72 [4.36], usual care 30.29 [4.26], P = .003). CONCLUSIONS Evidence-based transitional care services can exert positive effects on patient-centered indices. Our findings can be used as evidence of the need to establish patient-centered transitional care as a form of universal care for patients with COPD.
从医院到家庭的慢性阻塞性肺病过渡护理对以患者为中心的疗效的影响。
背景适当的从医院到家庭的过渡性护理对慢性阻塞性肺病患者使用医疗服务和健康结果的积极影响已得到认可。方法这项单盲随机对照试验纳入了在韩国两所大学医院之一确诊为慢性阻塞性肺病的受试者。研究共纳入 179 名受试者(过渡性护理组 87 人;常规护理组 92 人)。过渡性护理组接受的过渡性护理包括出院后护理计划、个性化教育、呼吸练习、电话咨询、家访和社会服务转介。我们通过比较两组患者的呼吸症状和各种以患者为中心的结果来分析这些干预措施的效果。结果干预组患者的改良医学研究委员会评分(平均值 [SD],过渡性护理 1.3 [1.06],常规护理 1.82 [1.1],P = .002)和慢性阻塞性肺病评估测试评分(过渡性护理 6.32 [5.5],常规护理 9.43 [7.16],P = .001)比常规护理组患者有更显著的改善。干预后,受试者对自身疾病的认识有所提高,吸入器使用频率增加(过渡性护理为 49.69 [1.67],常规护理为 46.86 [7.92],P = .002),抑郁和焦虑评分降低。此外,在住院期间的主题体验(过渡性护理 39.34 [6.14],常规护理 37.5 [5.61],P = .036)、出院前准备(过渡性护理 34.54 [4.结论基于证据的过渡性护理服务可对以患者为中心的指标产生积极影响。我们的研究结果证明,有必要将以患者为中心的过渡性护理作为慢性阻塞性肺病患者的一种普遍护理方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信