3DGCQA: A Quality Assessment Database for 3D AI-Generated Contents

Yingjie Zhou, Zicheng Zhang, Farong Wen, Jun Jia, Yanwei Jiang, Xiaohong Liu, Xiongkuo Min, Guangtao Zhai
{"title":"3DGCQA: A Quality Assessment Database for 3D AI-Generated Contents","authors":"Yingjie Zhou, Zicheng Zhang, Farong Wen, Jun Jia, Yanwei Jiang, Xiaohong Liu, Xiongkuo Min, Guangtao Zhai","doi":"arxiv-2409.07236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although 3D generated content (3DGC) offers advantages in reducing production\ncosts and accelerating design timelines, its quality often falls short when\ncompared to 3D professionally generated content. Common quality issues\nfrequently affect 3DGC, highlighting the importance of timely and effective\nquality assessment. Such evaluations not only ensure a higher standard of 3DGCs\nfor end-users but also provide critical insights for advancing generative\ntechnologies. To address existing gaps in this domain, this paper introduces a\nnovel 3DGC quality assessment dataset, 3DGCQA, built using 7 representative\nText-to-3D generation methods. During the dataset's construction, 50 fixed\nprompts are utilized to generate contents across all methods, resulting in the\ncreation of 313 textured meshes that constitute the 3DGCQA dataset. The\nvisualization intuitively reveals the presence of 6 common distortion\ncategories in the generated 3DGCs. To further explore the quality of the 3DGCs,\nsubjective quality assessment is conducted by evaluators, whose ratings reveal\nsignificant variation in quality across different generation methods.\nAdditionally, several objective quality assessment algorithms are tested on the\n3DGCQA dataset. The results expose limitations in the performance of existing\nalgorithms and underscore the need for developing more specialized quality\nassessment methods. To provide a valuable resource for future research and\ndevelopment in 3D content generation and quality assessment, the dataset has\nbeen open-sourced in https://github.com/zyj-2000/3DGCQA.","PeriodicalId":501289,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - EE - Image and Video Processing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - EE - Image and Video Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although 3D generated content (3DGC) offers advantages in reducing production costs and accelerating design timelines, its quality often falls short when compared to 3D professionally generated content. Common quality issues frequently affect 3DGC, highlighting the importance of timely and effective quality assessment. Such evaluations not only ensure a higher standard of 3DGCs for end-users but also provide critical insights for advancing generative technologies. To address existing gaps in this domain, this paper introduces a novel 3DGC quality assessment dataset, 3DGCQA, built using 7 representative Text-to-3D generation methods. During the dataset's construction, 50 fixed prompts are utilized to generate contents across all methods, resulting in the creation of 313 textured meshes that constitute the 3DGCQA dataset. The visualization intuitively reveals the presence of 6 common distortion categories in the generated 3DGCs. To further explore the quality of the 3DGCs, subjective quality assessment is conducted by evaluators, whose ratings reveal significant variation in quality across different generation methods. Additionally, several objective quality assessment algorithms are tested on the 3DGCQA dataset. The results expose limitations in the performance of existing algorithms and underscore the need for developing more specialized quality assessment methods. To provide a valuable resource for future research and development in 3D content generation and quality assessment, the dataset has been open-sourced in https://github.com/zyj-2000/3DGCQA.
3DGCQA:三维人工智能生成内容质量评估数据库
尽管三维生成内容(3DGC)在降低生产成本和加快设计进度方面具有优势,但与三维专业生成内容相比,其质量往往不尽如人意。常见的质量问题经常会影响 3DGC 的质量,这凸显了及时有效的质量评估的重要性。此类评估不仅能确保最终用户获得更高标准的 3DGC 内容,还能为生成技术的发展提供重要的启示。为了弥补该领域的现有差距,本文介绍了一个高级 3DGC 质量评估数据集 3DGCQA,该数据集采用 7 种具有代表性的文本到 3D 生成方法构建而成。在数据集的构建过程中,所有方法都使用了 50 个固定矩阵来生成内容,最终创建了 313 个纹理网格,这些网格构成了 3DGCQA 数据集。可视化直观地揭示了生成的 3DGC 中存在 6 种常见的失真类别。为了进一步探索 3DGC 的质量,评估人员对 3DGC 进行了主观质量评估,评估结果显示不同生成方法的质量存在显著差异。测试结果揭示了现有算法性能的局限性,并强调了开发更专业的质量评估方法的必要性。为了给未来三维内容生成和质量评估的研究和开发提供宝贵的资源,该数据集已在 https://github.com/zyj-2000/3DGCQA 中开源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信