Adverse Events During a 12-month Multi-Site and Dose-Response Aerobic Exercise Intervention

Eric Vidoni, George Grove, Amanda Szabo-Reed, Mickeal N Key, Haiqing Huang, Jeffrey M Burns, Charles H Hillman, John Jakicic, Chaeryon Kang, Arthur F Kramer, Edward McAuley, Lu Wan, Tera Hawes, Sydney S White, Kirk I Erickson
{"title":"Adverse Events During a 12-month Multi-Site and Dose-Response Aerobic Exercise Intervention","authors":"Eric Vidoni, George Grove, Amanda Szabo-Reed, Mickeal N Key, Haiqing Huang, Jeffrey M Burns, Charles H Hillman, John Jakicic, Chaeryon Kang, Arthur F Kramer, Edward McAuley, Lu Wan, Tera Hawes, Sydney S White, Kirk I Erickson","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.10.24313352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aimed to assess the incidence of adverse events (AE) in older adults participating in a year-long exercise intervention, investigating potential dose-response relationships between exercise intensity and AE frequency, and identifying demographic factors associated with AE risk.\nMethods: A total of 648 older adults were randomized into one of three exercise groups: low-intensity stretching and toning (S&T), 150 minutes of aerobic exercise per week (150Ex), or 225 minutes of aerobic exercise per week (225Ex). Adverse events were tracked during the intervention, with event rates calculated based on participant adherence and time in the study. Generalized linear models were employed to compare AE incidence across groups. Post hoc comparisons were used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for AE between groups, adjusting for multiple comparisons.\nResults: Overall, 306 AE were reported, with 44% related to the intervention. No significant dose-response relationship was observed for all-cause AE between groups. However, intervention-related AE were more frequent in the aerobic exercise groups. Participants in the 150Ex group had a 77% higher rate of intervention-related AE compared to the S&T group, and the 225Ex group had an 88% higher rate. Higher adherence was associated with fewer all-cause AE, and greater comorbid burden was associated with more AE.\nConclusions: While aerobic exercise increased the risk of intervention-related AE, the overall risk remained low. Higher adherence to the exercise regimen was associated with fewer AE. These findings suggest aerobic exercise is generally safe in older adults, with the benefits outweighing the risks.","PeriodicalId":501122,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Sports Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.10.24313352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the incidence of adverse events (AE) in older adults participating in a year-long exercise intervention, investigating potential dose-response relationships between exercise intensity and AE frequency, and identifying demographic factors associated with AE risk. Methods: A total of 648 older adults were randomized into one of three exercise groups: low-intensity stretching and toning (S&T), 150 minutes of aerobic exercise per week (150Ex), or 225 minutes of aerobic exercise per week (225Ex). Adverse events were tracked during the intervention, with event rates calculated based on participant adherence and time in the study. Generalized linear models were employed to compare AE incidence across groups. Post hoc comparisons were used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for AE between groups, adjusting for multiple comparisons. Results: Overall, 306 AE were reported, with 44% related to the intervention. No significant dose-response relationship was observed for all-cause AE between groups. However, intervention-related AE were more frequent in the aerobic exercise groups. Participants in the 150Ex group had a 77% higher rate of intervention-related AE compared to the S&T group, and the 225Ex group had an 88% higher rate. Higher adherence was associated with fewer all-cause AE, and greater comorbid burden was associated with more AE. Conclusions: While aerobic exercise increased the risk of intervention-related AE, the overall risk remained low. Higher adherence to the exercise regimen was associated with fewer AE. These findings suggest aerobic exercise is generally safe in older adults, with the benefits outweighing the risks.
为期 12 个月的多地点和剂量反应有氧运动干预期间的不良事件
目的:本研究旨在评估参与为期一年的运动干预的老年人的不良事件(AE)发生率,调查运动强度与AE频率之间的潜在剂量反应关系,并确定与AE风险相关的人口学因素:共有 648 名老年人被随机分为三个运动组:低强度拉伸和调理组(S&T)、每周 150 分钟有氧运动组(150Ex)或每周 225 分钟有氧运动组(225Ex)。在干预期间对不良事件进行跟踪,并根据参与者的坚持情况和参与研究的时间计算不良事件发生率。采用广义线性模型比较各组的不良事件发生率。事后比较用于计算组间 AE 的发生率比(IRR),并对多重比较进行调整:总计报告了 306 例 AE,其中 44% 与干预措施有关。各组间全因AE未观察到明显的剂量反应关系。然而,有氧运动组中与干预相关的 AE 更为常见。与 S&T 组相比,150Ex 组参与者的干预相关 AE 发生率高出 77%,而 225Ex 组则高出 88%。较高的坚持率与较少的全因AE相关,而较重的合并症负担与较多的AE相关:结论:虽然有氧运动会增加干预相关的AE风险,但总体风险仍然较低。结论:虽然有氧运动会增加干预相关的AE风险,但总体风险仍然较低。坚持运动方案的程度越高,AE越少。这些研究结果表明,有氧运动对老年人总体上是安全的,其益处大于风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信