Possible impact of national responses to the COVID pandemic on medal tallies at the Paris 2024 Olympics

John W. Orchard, Nathan Luies, Robert J. Buckley, Adam Castricum
{"title":"Possible impact of national responses to the COVID pandemic on medal tallies at the Paris 2024 Olympics","authors":"John W. Orchard, Nathan Luies, Robert J. Buckley, Adam Castricum","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.23.24312521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Western Pacific nations have experienced lower excess mortality compared to rest of the world since 2020 and recently performed exceptionally well on the medal tally at the 2024 Paris Olympics. This study aimed to analyse any possible connection between these factors.\nMethods: The top performing 18 nations from 2012, 2016 and 2020 Olympics (after Russia and Ukraine were excluded) had their relative Gold medals, total medals and medal points (Gold =3, Silver=2, Bronze=1) for Paris 2024 analysed using a backward stepwise linear regression model. Initial input factors included previous medal tallies, home city advantage, time zone effects, national excess deaths 2020-2023, average GDP growth 2020-2023 and number of country signatories to the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD), with factors >P=0.10 removed sequentially.\nResults: Total medals were best predicted by previous total medals (t=21.0, P<0.001) and home city advantage (t=4.1, P<0.001). Gold medals were best predicted by previous Gold medals (t=10.3, P<0.001), low national excess deaths (t=-3.2, P<0.007) and low signatories to the GBD (t=-2.2, P<0.05). Medal points were best predicted by previous medal points (t=18.1, P<0.001), home city advantage (t=3.2, P<0.007) and low national excess deaths (t=-1.8, P<0.09).\nDiscussion: The Western Pacific countries with a COVID-cautious national perspective (Australia, China, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea) tended to win more Gold medals than expected in Paris, compared to countries with a COVID-stoical national perspective (e.g. Great Britain, United States) which won fewer Golds than expected. This suggests that a COVID-cautious mentality may have contributed to better performance than a COVID-stoical approach. It is unclear whether any mechanism was physiological (less infectious disease impact before or during the Olympics) or psychological. If this effect existed for Golds, it did not appear to have any effect on Silver and Bronze medals.","PeriodicalId":501122,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Sports Medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.23.24312521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Western Pacific nations have experienced lower excess mortality compared to rest of the world since 2020 and recently performed exceptionally well on the medal tally at the 2024 Paris Olympics. This study aimed to analyse any possible connection between these factors. Methods: The top performing 18 nations from 2012, 2016 and 2020 Olympics (after Russia and Ukraine were excluded) had their relative Gold medals, total medals and medal points (Gold =3, Silver=2, Bronze=1) for Paris 2024 analysed using a backward stepwise linear regression model. Initial input factors included previous medal tallies, home city advantage, time zone effects, national excess deaths 2020-2023, average GDP growth 2020-2023 and number of country signatories to the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD), with factors >P=0.10 removed sequentially. Results: Total medals were best predicted by previous total medals (t=21.0, P<0.001) and home city advantage (t=4.1, P<0.001). Gold medals were best predicted by previous Gold medals (t=10.3, P<0.001), low national excess deaths (t=-3.2, P<0.007) and low signatories to the GBD (t=-2.2, P<0.05). Medal points were best predicted by previous medal points (t=18.1, P<0.001), home city advantage (t=3.2, P<0.007) and low national excess deaths (t=-1.8, P<0.09). Discussion: The Western Pacific countries with a COVID-cautious national perspective (Australia, China, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea) tended to win more Gold medals than expected in Paris, compared to countries with a COVID-stoical national perspective (e.g. Great Britain, United States) which won fewer Golds than expected. This suggests that a COVID-cautious mentality may have contributed to better performance than a COVID-stoical approach. It is unclear whether any mechanism was physiological (less infectious disease impact before or during the Olympics) or psychological. If this effect existed for Golds, it did not appear to have any effect on Silver and Bronze medals.
各国应对 COVID 大流行的措施对 2024 年巴黎奥运会奖牌总数的可能影响
导言:自 2020 年以来,西太平洋国家的超额死亡率低于世界其他国家,而且最近在 2024 年巴黎奥运会上的奖牌榜上表现优异。本研究旨在分析这些因素之间可能存在的联系:采用后向逐步线性回归模型,分析了 2012 年、2016 年和 2020 年奥运会上表现最好的 18 个国家(俄罗斯和乌克兰除外)在 2024 年巴黎奥运会上的相对金牌数、总奖牌数和奖牌积分(金牌=3,银牌=2,铜牌=1)。初始输入因素包括之前的奖牌总数、主场城市优势、时区效应、2020-2023 年全国超额死亡人数、2020-2023 年平均 GDP 增长率和《大巴林顿宣言》(GBD)签署国数量,并依次剔除 P=0.10 的因素:以往总奖牌数(t=21.0,P<0.001)和主场优势(t=4.1,P<0.001)对总奖牌数的预测效果最佳。金牌的最佳预测条件是以前获得过金牌(t=10.3,P<0.001)、全国超额死亡人数少(t=-3.2,P<0.007)和《全球体育发展报告》签署国少(t=-2.2,P<0.05)。以前的奖牌积分(t=18.1,P<0.001)、主场优势(t=3.2,P<0.007)和全国超额死亡人数少(t=-1.8,P<0.09)最能预测奖牌积分:讨论:西太平洋国家(澳大利亚、中国、日本、新西兰、韩国)在巴黎赢得的金牌数往往比预期的要多,相比之下,从 COVID 角度看问题的国家(如英国、美国)赢得的金牌数比预期的要少。这表明,COVID-谨慎的心态可能比 COVID-稳健的方法有助于取得更好的成绩。目前还不清楚其中的机制是生理性的(奥运会之前或期间传染病的影响较小)还是心理性的。如果对金牌存在这种影响,那么对银牌和铜牌似乎没有任何影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信