‘A challenge to my professional identity’- resisting the shift from over-management to self-management for back pain within an implementation trial: a qualitative study

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Ron Feldman , Tamar Pincus , Noa Ben Ami
{"title":"‘A challenge to my professional identity’- resisting the shift from over-management to self-management for back pain within an implementation trial: a qualitative study","authors":"Ron Feldman ,&nbsp;Tamar Pincus ,&nbsp;Noa Ben Ami","doi":"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The Enhanced Transtheoretical Model Intervention (ETMI) is based on behavioral models and focuses on guiding Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) patients to self-manage symptoms and engage in recreational physical activity. While there is promising evidence that ETMI benefits patients, it is unclear how challenging it might be to implement widely. This investigation focused on the perceptions of physiotherapists trained to deliver ETMI for CLBP.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A Qualitative study comprised of semi-structured interviews (July to November 2023). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically by two independent researchers.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Data were obtained as part of a large implementation study evaluating the uptake and impact of ETMI amongst physiotherapists in a large public healthcare setting.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>22 physiotherapists trained to deliver the ETMI approach and chose to use it with at least one patient.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>While physiotherapists acknowledged the evidence base behind ETMI and the clarity of the approach, they struggled to adapt it to routine delivery. Exploration of the reasons for this identified an overarching meta-theme, ‘A challenge to my professional identity’, and three main themes consisting of 1) interventions such as ETMI contradicted my training. 2) I am ambivalent/ do not accept evidence that contradicts my habitual practice, and 3) I am under-skilled in psychological and communication skills.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the reluctance of physiotherapists to implement evidence-based interventions such as ETMI, which fundamentally challenge their traditional practice and therapeutic identity. The shift from over-management by experts seeking cures to supporting self-management was not palatable to physiotherapists. The challenge of embracing a new professional identity must be addressed to enable a successful implementation of the approach.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution of the Paper</h3><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>This study highlights the reluctance of physiotherapists to implement evidence-based interventions such as ETMI, which fundamentally challenge their traditional practice and therapeutic identity.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>The shift from overdiagnosis (weak cores, bad postures, unstable back, or disc sliding) and over-management (specific exercises, modalities, or special techniques) by experts seeking cures to support self-management was not palatable to physiotherapists.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>The findings could lead to a reevaluation of professional development programs for physiotherapists, with an emphasis on updating skills and knowledge to align with evidence-based practices, ultimately aiming to enhance the quality of care provided to patients.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 101424"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031940624004334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The Enhanced Transtheoretical Model Intervention (ETMI) is based on behavioral models and focuses on guiding Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) patients to self-manage symptoms and engage in recreational physical activity. While there is promising evidence that ETMI benefits patients, it is unclear how challenging it might be to implement widely. This investigation focused on the perceptions of physiotherapists trained to deliver ETMI for CLBP.

Design

A Qualitative study comprised of semi-structured interviews (July to November 2023). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically by two independent researchers.

Setting

Data were obtained as part of a large implementation study evaluating the uptake and impact of ETMI amongst physiotherapists in a large public healthcare setting.

Participants

22 physiotherapists trained to deliver the ETMI approach and chose to use it with at least one patient.

Results

While physiotherapists acknowledged the evidence base behind ETMI and the clarity of the approach, they struggled to adapt it to routine delivery. Exploration of the reasons for this identified an overarching meta-theme, ‘A challenge to my professional identity’, and three main themes consisting of 1) interventions such as ETMI contradicted my training. 2) I am ambivalent/ do not accept evidence that contradicts my habitual practice, and 3) I am under-skilled in psychological and communication skills.

Conclusion

This study highlights the reluctance of physiotherapists to implement evidence-based interventions such as ETMI, which fundamentally challenge their traditional practice and therapeutic identity. The shift from over-management by experts seeking cures to supporting self-management was not palatable to physiotherapists. The challenge of embracing a new professional identity must be addressed to enable a successful implementation of the approach.

Contribution of the Paper

  • This study highlights the reluctance of physiotherapists to implement evidence-based interventions such as ETMI, which fundamentally challenge their traditional practice and therapeutic identity.
  • The shift from overdiagnosis (weak cores, bad postures, unstable back, or disc sliding) and over-management (specific exercises, modalities, or special techniques) by experts seeking cures to support self-management was not palatable to physiotherapists.
  • The findings could lead to a reevaluation of professional development programs for physiotherapists, with an emphasis on updating skills and knowledge to align with evidence-based practices, ultimately aiming to enhance the quality of care provided to patients.
对我职业身份的挑战"--在实施试验中抵制背痛从过度管理到自我管理的转变:一项定性研究
目的增强型经理论模型干预(ETMI)以行为模型为基础,侧重于指导慢性腰背痛(CLBP)患者自我管理症状并参与娱乐性体育活动。虽然有证据表明 ETMI 能使患者受益,但目前还不清楚广泛实施 ETMI 所面临的挑战有多大。本调查的重点是接受过 ETMI 治疗慢性阻塞性肺病培训的物理治疗师的看法。设计定性研究包括半结构式访谈(2023 年 7 月至 11 月)。访谈由两名独立研究人员进行录音、转录、编码和专题分析。研究背景数据是一项大型实施研究的一部分,该研究评估了大型公共医疗机构中物理治疗师对 ETMI 的接受程度和影响。对其原因的探索发现了一个总的元主题 "对我专业身份的挑战",以及三个主要的主题,包括 1) ETMI 等干预措施与我所接受的培训相矛盾。2) 我很矛盾/不接受与我的习惯做法相矛盾的证据,以及 3) 我的心理和沟通技能不足。物理治疗师无法接受从专家过度管理到支持自我管理的转变。本文的贡献--本研究强调了物理治疗师不愿意实施 ETMI 等循证干预措施,因为这从根本上挑战了他们的传统做法和治疗身份。-从专家的过度诊断(核心薄弱、姿势不良、背部不稳或椎间盘滑动)和过度管理(特定运动、模式或特殊技术)到支持自我管理的转变,物理治疗师并不乐于接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiotherapy
Physiotherapy 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
377
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy aims to publish original research and facilitate continuing professional development for physiotherapists and other health professions worldwide. Dedicated to the advancement of physiotherapy through publication of research and scholarly work concerned with, but not limited to, its scientific basis and clinical application, education of practitioners, management of services and policy. We are pleased to receive articles reporting original scientific research, systematic reviews or meta-analyses, theoretical or debate articles, brief reports and technical reports. All papers should demonstrate methodological rigour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信