Work Environment, Burnout, and Intent to Leave Current Job Among Cardiologists and Cardiology Health Care Workers: Results From the National Coping With COVID Survey.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sanjoyita Mallick,Pamela S Douglas,Gautam R Shroff,Rehan Karim,Erin Sullivan,Christine Sinsky,Nancy Nankivil,Purva Shah,Roger Brown,Mark Linzer
{"title":"Work Environment, Burnout, and Intent to Leave Current Job Among Cardiologists and Cardiology Health Care Workers: Results From the National Coping With COVID Survey.","authors":"Sanjoyita Mallick,Pamela S Douglas,Gautam R Shroff,Rehan Karim,Erin Sullivan,Christine Sinsky,Nancy Nankivil,Purva Shah,Roger Brown,Mark Linzer","doi":"10.1161/jaha.123.034527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nLittle is known about factors contributing to burnout and intent to leave in cardiologists and other cardiology health care workers.\r\n\r\nMETHODS AND RESULTS\r\nThe Coping With COVID survey assessed work conditions, burnout, and intent to leave among physicians, nurses, advanced practice providers, and other clinical staff (OCS) from April 2020 to December 2020. Single-item measures assessed work conditions, burnout (emotional exhaustion), and intent to leave. Multilevel logistic regression examined work life variables' relationships to burnout among role types and feeling valued as a mediator. Open-ended comments analyzed via grounded theory contributed to a conceptual model. Coping With COVID was completed by 1199 US cardiology health care workers (354 physician/520 nurses/198 advanced practice providers/127 OCS). Nurses were most likely to report burnout (59% nurses, 57% OCS, 46% advanced practice providers, 40% physicians, P<0.0001). Workload correlated with burnout in all groups (adjusted odds ratios [aORs], 4.1-17.4; Ps<0.005), whereas anxiety/depression related to burnout in all except OCS (aORs, 3.9-8.3; Ps≤0.001). Feeling valued was related to lower burnout in most groups. Intent to leave was common (23%-45%) and was lower in physicians and advanced practice providers who felt valued (aORs, 0.26 and 0.22, respectively; Ps<0.05). Burnout was highest for nurses in practice 16 to 20 years, and intent to leave was highest for OCS in practice 16 to 20 years. Themes contributing to burnout included personal and patient safety, leadership, and financial issues.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nBurnout was prevalent among cardiology health care workers and highest in nurses and OCS. Addressing factors associated with burnout in different role types may improve work life sustainability for all cardiology health care workers.","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.123.034527","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Little is known about factors contributing to burnout and intent to leave in cardiologists and other cardiology health care workers. METHODS AND RESULTS The Coping With COVID survey assessed work conditions, burnout, and intent to leave among physicians, nurses, advanced practice providers, and other clinical staff (OCS) from April 2020 to December 2020. Single-item measures assessed work conditions, burnout (emotional exhaustion), and intent to leave. Multilevel logistic regression examined work life variables' relationships to burnout among role types and feeling valued as a mediator. Open-ended comments analyzed via grounded theory contributed to a conceptual model. Coping With COVID was completed by 1199 US cardiology health care workers (354 physician/520 nurses/198 advanced practice providers/127 OCS). Nurses were most likely to report burnout (59% nurses, 57% OCS, 46% advanced practice providers, 40% physicians, P<0.0001). Workload correlated with burnout in all groups (adjusted odds ratios [aORs], 4.1-17.4; Ps<0.005), whereas anxiety/depression related to burnout in all except OCS (aORs, 3.9-8.3; Ps≤0.001). Feeling valued was related to lower burnout in most groups. Intent to leave was common (23%-45%) and was lower in physicians and advanced practice providers who felt valued (aORs, 0.26 and 0.22, respectively; Ps<0.05). Burnout was highest for nurses in practice 16 to 20 years, and intent to leave was highest for OCS in practice 16 to 20 years. Themes contributing to burnout included personal and patient safety, leadership, and financial issues. CONCLUSIONS Burnout was prevalent among cardiology health care workers and highest in nurses and OCS. Addressing factors associated with burnout in different role types may improve work life sustainability for all cardiology health care workers.
心脏病学家和心脏病学医护人员的工作环境、职业倦怠和离职意向:全国应对 COVID 调查的结果。
方法和结果:Coping With COVID 调查评估了 2020 年 4 月至 2020 年 12 月期间医生、护士、高级医疗服务提供者和其他临床工作人员 (OCS) 的工作条件、职业倦怠和离职意向。单项测量评估了工作条件、职业倦怠(情感衰竭)和离职意向。多层次逻辑回归检验了不同角色类型的工作生活变量与职业倦怠之间的关系,以及作为中介因素的受重视感。通过基础理论分析的开放式评论有助于形成一个概念模型。1199 名美国心脏病学医护人员(354 名医生/520 名护士/198 名高级医疗服务提供者/127 名 OCS)填写了 "应对 COVID"。护士最有可能报告职业倦怠(59% 的护士、57% 的非专业护理人员、46% 的高级医疗服务提供者、40% 的医生,P<0.0001)。在所有组别中,工作量与职业倦怠相关(调整后的几率比 [aORs],4.1-17.4;Ps<0.005),而焦虑/抑郁与职业倦怠相关(aORs,3.9-8.3;Ps≤0.001),OCS 除外。在大多数组别中,感觉自己有价值与倦怠感较低有关。离职意向很常见(23%-45%),而在感到被重视的医生和高级医疗服务提供者中,离职意向较低(aORs 分别为 0.26 和 0.22;Ps<0.05)。执业 16-20 年的护士倦怠感最高,执业 16-20 年的老年护理人员离职意向最高。导致职业倦怠的因素包括个人和患者安全、领导力和财务问题。解决不同角色类型中与职业倦怠相关的因素可能会改善所有心脏病学医护人员工作生活的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信