Combination between Composting and Vermicomposting of OFMSW: A Sicilian Case Study

Enrico Licitra, Maria Gabriella Giustra, Gaetano Di Bella, Antonio Messineo
{"title":"Combination between Composting and Vermicomposting of OFMSW: A Sicilian Case Study","authors":"Enrico Licitra, Maria Gabriella Giustra, Gaetano Di Bella, Antonio Messineo","doi":"10.3390/environments11080183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In nature, earthworms process enormous quantities of plant debris, ingesting and converting them into vermicast, the final product of their digestion process. Vermicast is widely recognized as an organic fertilizer suitable for plants, usually obtained from the transformation of animal manure. Indeed, controlled vermicomposting of the organic fraction from municipal solid waste (OFMSW) has yielded contradictory results, limiting the extension of laboratory results to larger-scale initiatives. This study aims to analyze a combined composting–vermicomposting process using Eisenia fetida (also known as Californian red worm) for the treatment of OFMSW (containing different impurities, such as heavy metals), mixed with a suitable substrate for earthworms, consisting of a blend of animal bedding and pre-selected food scraps (SOM—pre-selected organic material). Different fractions from a municipal composting plant were tested for the biological process: raw OFMSW, pre-composted (PC, organic matrix that has completed the thermophilic biodegradation phase), and compost (C). Laboratory tests involved five different applications with varying mixing proportions, partly aided by the addition of OM. The physical–chemical parameters (e.g., pH, temperature, moisture) and worm growth rate in the different treatments were measured and compared. The results showed that the process improved the quality of the final product, especially for the selected matrices, and revealed a significant reduction in the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (lower than 14 in all tests) when vermicomposting was applied to the mixed matrices and SOM. Worms increased during the process in net weight and growth rate, even if there was an accumulation of heavy metals in the “worm tea”. Worm mass reached a little over double the initial value in all tests (from 200 g to more than 500 g in the SOM test), except for an increase of only 87% in the OFMSW test, while heavy metal content in the solid matrix was reduced in all tests compared to the starting content.","PeriodicalId":11886,"journal":{"name":"Environments","volume":"135 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11080183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In nature, earthworms process enormous quantities of plant debris, ingesting and converting them into vermicast, the final product of their digestion process. Vermicast is widely recognized as an organic fertilizer suitable for plants, usually obtained from the transformation of animal manure. Indeed, controlled vermicomposting of the organic fraction from municipal solid waste (OFMSW) has yielded contradictory results, limiting the extension of laboratory results to larger-scale initiatives. This study aims to analyze a combined composting–vermicomposting process using Eisenia fetida (also known as Californian red worm) for the treatment of OFMSW (containing different impurities, such as heavy metals), mixed with a suitable substrate for earthworms, consisting of a blend of animal bedding and pre-selected food scraps (SOM—pre-selected organic material). Different fractions from a municipal composting plant were tested for the biological process: raw OFMSW, pre-composted (PC, organic matrix that has completed the thermophilic biodegradation phase), and compost (C). Laboratory tests involved five different applications with varying mixing proportions, partly aided by the addition of OM. The physical–chemical parameters (e.g., pH, temperature, moisture) and worm growth rate in the different treatments were measured and compared. The results showed that the process improved the quality of the final product, especially for the selected matrices, and revealed a significant reduction in the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (lower than 14 in all tests) when vermicomposting was applied to the mixed matrices and SOM. Worms increased during the process in net weight and growth rate, even if there was an accumulation of heavy metals in the “worm tea”. Worm mass reached a little over double the initial value in all tests (from 200 g to more than 500 g in the SOM test), except for an increase of only 87% in the OFMSW test, while heavy metal content in the solid matrix was reduced in all tests compared to the starting content.
OFMSW 堆肥与蚯蚓堆肥的结合:西西里案例研究
在自然界中,蚯蚓会处理大量的植物碎屑,摄取并将其转化为蚯蚓粪,这是蚯蚓消化过程的最终产物。蚯蚓粪被广泛认为是一种适合植物生长的有机肥料,通常从动物粪便的转化过程中获得。事实上,对城市固体废弃物(OFMSW)中的有机部分进行受控蛭石堆肥产生了相互矛盾的结果,限制了将实验室结果推广到更大规模的举措。本研究旨在分析一种堆肥-蚯蚓堆肥组合工艺,该工艺使用 Eisenia fetida(又称加州红蚯蚓)处理城市固体废弃物(含有重金属等不同杂质),并与适合蚯蚓生长的基质混合,基质由动物垫料和预选食物残渣(SOM-预选有机材料)组成。对市政堆肥厂的不同部分进行了生物处理测试:未加工的 OFMSW、预堆肥(PC,已完成嗜热生物降解阶段的有机基质)和堆肥(C)。实验室测试包括五种不同的应用,混合比例各不相同,部分是通过添加 OM 来辅助。对不同处理中的物理化学参数(如 pH 值、温度、湿度)和蠕虫生长率进行了测量和比较。结果表明,当蚯蚓堆肥应用于混合基质和 SOM 时,提高了最终产品的质量,尤其是所选基质的质量,并显著降低了碳氮比(在所有试验中均低于 14)。在这一过程中,即使 "虫茶 "中的重金属积累,蠕虫的净重和生长速度也有所增加。除 OFMSW 试验中仅增加了 87% 外,所有试验中的蠕虫质量都达到了初始值的两倍多一点(在 SOM 试验中从 200 克增加到 500 克以上),而固体基质中的重金属含量与初始含量相比在所有试验中都有所减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信