Rhiannon Udall, Sophie Hourihane, Simona Miller, Derek Davis, Katerina Chatziioannou, Max Isi, Howard Deshong
{"title":"The anti-aligned spin of GW191109: glitch mitigation and its implications","authors":"Rhiannon Udall, Sophie Hourihane, Simona Miller, Derek Davis, Katerina Chatziioannou, Max Isi, Howard Deshong","doi":"arxiv-2409.03912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With a high total mass and an inferred effective spin anti-aligned with the\norbital axis at the 99.9% level, GW191109 is one of the most promising\ncandidates for a dynamical formation origin among gravitational wave events\nobserved so far. However, the data containing GW191109 are afflicted with\nterrestrial noise transients, i.e., detector glitches, generated by the\nscattering of laser light in both LIGO detectors. We study the implications of\nthe glitch(es) on the inferred properties and astrophysical interpretation of\nGW191109. Using time- and frequency-domain analysis methods, we isolate the\ncritical data for spin inference to 35 - 40 Hz and 0.1 - 0.04 s before the\nmerger in LIGO Livingston, directly coincident with the glitch. Using two\nmodels of glitch behavior, one tailored to slow scattered light and one more\ngeneric, we perform joint inference of the glitch and binary parameters. When\nthe glitch is modeled as slow scattered light, the binary parameters favor\nanti-aligned spins, in agreement with existing interpretations. When more\nflexible glitch modeling based on sine-Gaussian wavelets is used instead, a\nbimodal aligned/anti-aligned solution emerges. The anti-aligned spin mode is\ncorrelated with a weaker inferred glitch and preferred by ~ 70 : 30 compared to\nthe aligned spin mode and a stronger inferred glitch. We conclude that if we\nassume that the data are only impacted by slow scattering noise, then the\nanti-aligned spin inference is robust. However, the data alone cannot validate\nthis assumption and resolve the anti-aligned spin and potentially dynamical\nformation history of GW191109.","PeriodicalId":501041,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.03912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With a high total mass and an inferred effective spin anti-aligned with the
orbital axis at the 99.9% level, GW191109 is one of the most promising
candidates for a dynamical formation origin among gravitational wave events
observed so far. However, the data containing GW191109 are afflicted with
terrestrial noise transients, i.e., detector glitches, generated by the
scattering of laser light in both LIGO detectors. We study the implications of
the glitch(es) on the inferred properties and astrophysical interpretation of
GW191109. Using time- and frequency-domain analysis methods, we isolate the
critical data for spin inference to 35 - 40 Hz and 0.1 - 0.04 s before the
merger in LIGO Livingston, directly coincident with the glitch. Using two
models of glitch behavior, one tailored to slow scattered light and one more
generic, we perform joint inference of the glitch and binary parameters. When
the glitch is modeled as slow scattered light, the binary parameters favor
anti-aligned spins, in agreement with existing interpretations. When more
flexible glitch modeling based on sine-Gaussian wavelets is used instead, a
bimodal aligned/anti-aligned solution emerges. The anti-aligned spin mode is
correlated with a weaker inferred glitch and preferred by ~ 70 : 30 compared to
the aligned spin mode and a stronger inferred glitch. We conclude that if we
assume that the data are only impacted by slow scattering noise, then the
anti-aligned spin inference is robust. However, the data alone cannot validate
this assumption and resolve the anti-aligned spin and potentially dynamical
formation history of GW191109.