Sensitivity analysis of low salinity waterflood alternating immiscible CO2 injection (Immiscible CO2-LSWAG) performance using machine learning application in sandstone reservoir

IF 2.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Muhammad Ridho Efras, Iskandar Dzulkarnain, Syahrir Ridha, Loris Alif Syahputra, Muhammad Hammad Rasool, Mohammad Galang Merdeka, Agus Astra Pramana
{"title":"Sensitivity analysis of low salinity waterflood alternating immiscible CO2 injection (Immiscible CO2-LSWAG) performance using machine learning application in sandstone reservoir","authors":"Muhammad Ridho Efras, Iskandar Dzulkarnain, Syahrir Ridha, Loris Alif Syahputra, Muhammad Hammad Rasool, Mohammad Galang Merdeka, Agus Astra Pramana","doi":"10.1007/s13202-024-01849-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Low salinity water alternating immiscible gas CO<sub>2</sub> (Immiscible CO<sub>2</sub>-LSWAG) injection is a popular technique for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) that combines the benefits of low salinity and immiscible CO<sub>2</sub> flooding to increase and accelerate oil production. This approach modifies the displacement properties of the reservoir, resulting in higher sweep efficiency and greater oil production. The current study employs a combination of numerical and machine learning techniques to comprehensively investigate the performance of immiscible CO<sub>2</sub>-LSWAG injection in a sandstone reservoir. Furthermore, a detailed sensitivity analysis of various injection and reservoir parameters is conducted to gain deeper insights into their impact on the process. In order to predict the oil recovery factor (RF), the study employs 1000 experimental designs on initial oil-wet. The numerical simulation results indicate that immiscible CO<sub>2</sub>-LSWAG injection outperforms conventional immiscible CO<sub>2</sub> and low salinity waterflood injection, resulting in a higher oil RF. The machine learning models of Catboost and LightGBM used in this study produced R<sup>2</sup> scores higher than 0.95 with lower errors between the predicted and actual results. This indicates that machine learning models can provide a faster and more accurate alternative to numerical simulation. The sensitivity analysis results from the machine learning model reveal that the major contributing factors to oil RF are the chemical composition of the injected water and the injection rate. In summary, this study leverages machine learning for sensitivity analysis in immiscible CO2-LSWAG performance in oil-wet sandstone reservoirs. Key findings include the identification of top influencing parameters and high predictive accuracy of CatBoost and LightGBM algorithms. The results facilitate quick decision-making for field trials by focusing on major contributing factors, with future research suggested for broader applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-024-01849-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low salinity water alternating immiscible gas CO2 (Immiscible CO2-LSWAG) injection is a popular technique for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) that combines the benefits of low salinity and immiscible CO2 flooding to increase and accelerate oil production. This approach modifies the displacement properties of the reservoir, resulting in higher sweep efficiency and greater oil production. The current study employs a combination of numerical and machine learning techniques to comprehensively investigate the performance of immiscible CO2-LSWAG injection in a sandstone reservoir. Furthermore, a detailed sensitivity analysis of various injection and reservoir parameters is conducted to gain deeper insights into their impact on the process. In order to predict the oil recovery factor (RF), the study employs 1000 experimental designs on initial oil-wet. The numerical simulation results indicate that immiscible CO2-LSWAG injection outperforms conventional immiscible CO2 and low salinity waterflood injection, resulting in a higher oil RF. The machine learning models of Catboost and LightGBM used in this study produced R2 scores higher than 0.95 with lower errors between the predicted and actual results. This indicates that machine learning models can provide a faster and more accurate alternative to numerical simulation. The sensitivity analysis results from the machine learning model reveal that the major contributing factors to oil RF are the chemical composition of the injected water and the injection rate. In summary, this study leverages machine learning for sensitivity analysis in immiscible CO2-LSWAG performance in oil-wet sandstone reservoirs. Key findings include the identification of top influencing parameters and high predictive accuracy of CatBoost and LightGBM algorithms. The results facilitate quick decision-making for field trials by focusing on major contributing factors, with future research suggested for broader applications.

Abstract Image

在砂岩储层中应用机器学习对低盐度注水交替不混溶二氧化碳注入(不混溶二氧化碳-LSWAG)性能的敏感性分析
低盐度水交替注入不溶性气体二氧化碳(Immiscible CO2-LSWAG)是一种常用的提高石油采收率(EOR)技术,它结合了低盐度和不溶性二氧化碳充注的优点,以提高和加速石油产量。这种方法改变了储油层的位移特性,从而提高了扫油效率和石油产量。目前的研究结合数值和机器学习技术,全面研究了砂岩油藏中不溶性二氧化碳-LSWAG 注入的性能。此外,还对各种注入参数和油藏参数进行了详细的敏感性分析,以深入了解它们对工艺的影响。为了预测采油系数(RF),研究采用了 1000 个初始湿油实验设计。数值模拟结果表明,不相溶 CO2-LSWAG 注入优于传统的不相溶 CO2 和低盐度注水,从而获得更高的石油采收率。本研究中使用的 Catboost 和 LightGBM 机器学习模型产生的 R2 分数高于 0.95,预测结果与实际结果之间的误差较小。这表明机器学习模型可以更快、更准确地替代数值模拟。机器学习模型的敏感性分析结果表明,影响射频油的主要因素是注入水的化学成分和注入速度。总之,本研究利用机器学习对油湿砂岩油藏中的不溶性 CO2-LSWAG 性能进行了敏感性分析。主要发现包括确定了主要影响参数,以及 CatBoost 和 LightGBM 算法的高预测准确性。研究结果通过聚焦主要影响因素,为现场试验的快速决策提供了便利,并为更广泛的应用提出了未来研究建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology is an international open access journal that publishes original and review articles as well as book reviews on leading edge studies in the field of petroleum engineering, petroleum geology and exploration geophysics and the implementation of related technologies to the development and management of oil and gas reservoirs from their discovery through their entire production cycle. Focusing on: Reservoir characterization and modeling Unconventional oil and gas reservoirs Geophysics: Acquisition and near surface Geophysics Modeling and Imaging Geophysics: Interpretation Geophysics: Processing Production Engineering Formation Evaluation Reservoir Management Petroleum Geology Enhanced Recovery Geomechanics Drilling Completions The Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct. Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice as detailed here: https://www.springer.com/us/editorial-policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信