Presence and Absence of Beehives as a Management Tool for Reducing Elephant-Induced Tree Mortality

Diversity Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.3390/d16090577
Robin M. Cook, Michelle D. Henley
{"title":"Presence and Absence of Beehives as a Management Tool for Reducing Elephant-Induced Tree Mortality","authors":"Robin M. Cook, Michelle D. Henley","doi":"10.3390/d16090577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beehives have previously been used to protect large trees from elephant impact in sub-arid savannas, thus improving the persistence of large trees as habitats for other species. This brief report aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the presence and absence of beehives as a management tool for reducing elephant-induced tree mortality. The study was conducted in three phases: Phase 1 (2015–2020) involved actively maintaining beehives on marula trees (Sclerocarya birrea subsp. caffra), Phase 2 (2020–2022) the systematic reduction in the number of active beehives, and Phase 3 (2022–2024) the removal of all beehives. The persistence rates of the trees with beehives were compared to those without beehives. We found that beehives significantly improved the persistence of the trees in the presence of elephants. During Phase 1, only 10% of the trees with beehives died compared to 34% of the trees with no beehives. In Phase 2, with a reduced number of active beehives, the mortality rates increased slightly for both trees with beehives and those without. However, in Phase 3, after the removal of all the beehives, the mortality rates significantly increased for all the trees monitored as part of the study. We also found that the mortality rate of the original trees with no beehives increased when beehives were removed from the study site, whilst the mortality rate of the original beehive trees without beehives in Phase 3 (8.7%) surpassed that of the 8.1% prior to the hanging of beehives. These findings highlight the effectiveness of beehives as a tree protection method against elephant impact and how beehives can improve the persistence of tree populations co-occurring with elephants.","PeriodicalId":501149,"journal":{"name":"Diversity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/d16090577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Beehives have previously been used to protect large trees from elephant impact in sub-arid savannas, thus improving the persistence of large trees as habitats for other species. This brief report aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the presence and absence of beehives as a management tool for reducing elephant-induced tree mortality. The study was conducted in three phases: Phase 1 (2015–2020) involved actively maintaining beehives on marula trees (Sclerocarya birrea subsp. caffra), Phase 2 (2020–2022) the systematic reduction in the number of active beehives, and Phase 3 (2022–2024) the removal of all beehives. The persistence rates of the trees with beehives were compared to those without beehives. We found that beehives significantly improved the persistence of the trees in the presence of elephants. During Phase 1, only 10% of the trees with beehives died compared to 34% of the trees with no beehives. In Phase 2, with a reduced number of active beehives, the mortality rates increased slightly for both trees with beehives and those without. However, in Phase 3, after the removal of all the beehives, the mortality rates significantly increased for all the trees monitored as part of the study. We also found that the mortality rate of the original trees with no beehives increased when beehives were removed from the study site, whilst the mortality rate of the original beehive trees without beehives in Phase 3 (8.7%) surpassed that of the 8.1% prior to the hanging of beehives. These findings highlight the effectiveness of beehives as a tree protection method against elephant impact and how beehives can improve the persistence of tree populations co-occurring with elephants.
将蜂箱的存在与否作为减少大象造成树木死亡的管理工具
蜂箱以前曾被用来保护亚干旱稀树草原中的大树免受大象的影响,从而改善大树作为其他物种栖息地的持久性。本简要报告旨在调查蜂箱的存在和不存在作为减少大象引起的树木死亡的管理工具的有效性。研究分三个阶段进行:第 1 阶段(2015-2020 年)积极维护马鲁拉树(Sclerocarya birrea subsp. caffra)上的蜂箱,第 2 阶段(2020-2022 年)有计划地减少活跃蜂箱的数量,第 3 阶段(2022-2024 年)清除所有蜂箱。有蜂箱的树木与没有蜂箱的树木的持续率进行了比较。我们发现,蜂箱大大提高了树木在大象面前的存活率。在第一阶段,有蜂箱的树木只有10%死亡,而没有蜂箱的树木则有34%死亡。在第二阶段,由于活跃蜂箱数量减少,有蜂箱和无蜂箱树木的死亡率都略有上升。然而,在第 3 阶段,移除所有蜂箱后,作为研究一部分进行监测的所有树木的死亡率都显著上升。我们还发现,从研究地点移走蜂箱后,原来没有蜂箱的树木的死亡率也增加了,而在第 3 阶段,原来没有蜂箱的树木的死亡率(8.7%)超过了悬挂蜂箱前的 8.1%。这些发现凸显了蜂箱作为一种保护树木免受大象影响的方法的有效性,以及蜂箱如何能够改善与大象共生的树木种群的持久性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信