Green finance reform policy increases corporate hypocritical business strategies: Evidence from the greenwashing behavior

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Tielong Wu
{"title":"Green finance reform policy increases corporate hypocritical business strategies: Evidence from the greenwashing behavior","authors":"Tielong Wu","doi":"10.1007/s11027-024-10162-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many countries have initiated specific regions dedicated to Green Finance to enhance environmental sustainability. This paper examines the influence of these zones on corporate greenwashing practices, using data from Chinese listed companies. Greenwashing is assessed by comparing corporate environmental, social, and governance disclosures against their actual performance in these areas. We find that the establishment of Green Finance Pilot Zones, which means experimental zones, significantly increases greenwashing behavior. These zones reduce actual performance in environmental, social, and governance aspects without altering disclosure practices. Additionally, the impact of these zones on greenwashing is more pronounced in companies with higher debt ratios and when environmental subsidies expire, indicating that financial incentives drive greenwashing. Conversely, stricter government regulations can mitigate this negative effect. The detrimental impact of these zones is notably observed in non-state-owned enterprises, non-heavy polluting companies, and industries with lower market concentration. The findings provide a foundation for further international studies and collaboration in the pursuit of global environmental sustainability, aiding the design and implementation of more robust and transparent Green Finance programs that can be adapted to various economic contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":54387,"journal":{"name":"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10162-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many countries have initiated specific regions dedicated to Green Finance to enhance environmental sustainability. This paper examines the influence of these zones on corporate greenwashing practices, using data from Chinese listed companies. Greenwashing is assessed by comparing corporate environmental, social, and governance disclosures against their actual performance in these areas. We find that the establishment of Green Finance Pilot Zones, which means experimental zones, significantly increases greenwashing behavior. These zones reduce actual performance in environmental, social, and governance aspects without altering disclosure practices. Additionally, the impact of these zones on greenwashing is more pronounced in companies with higher debt ratios and when environmental subsidies expire, indicating that financial incentives drive greenwashing. Conversely, stricter government regulations can mitigate this negative effect. The detrimental impact of these zones is notably observed in non-state-owned enterprises, non-heavy polluting companies, and industries with lower market concentration. The findings provide a foundation for further international studies and collaboration in the pursuit of global environmental sustainability, aiding the design and implementation of more robust and transparent Green Finance programs that can be adapted to various economic contexts.

Abstract Image

绿色金融改革政策增加了企业的虚伪经营策略:来自绿色清洗行为的证据
许多国家都设立了专门的绿色金融区域,以加强环境的可持续发展。本文利用中国上市公司的数据,研究了这些区域对企业 "洗绿 "行为的影响。通过比较企业在环境、社会和治理方面的信息披露与实际表现,对 "洗绿 "行为进行评估。我们发现,绿色金融试验区(即实验区)的设立大大增加了企业的 "洗绿 "行为。这些试验区降低了企业在环境、社会和治理方面的实际表现,却没有改变信息披露的做法。此外,这些试验区对 "洗绿 "行为的影响在负债率较高的公司和环境补贴到期的公司中更为明显,这表明经济激励推动了 "洗绿 "行为。相反,更严格的政府法规可以减轻这种负面影响。在非国有企业、非重污染企业和市场集中度较低的行业中,可以明显观察到这些区域的不利影响。这些研究结果为进一步开展国际研究与合作以实现全球环境的可持续发展奠定了基础,有助于设计和实施更健全、更透明的绿色金融计划,使其能够适应不同的经济环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Earth''s biosphere is being transformed by various anthropogenic activities. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change addresses a wide range of environment, economic and energy topics and timely issues including global climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, acid deposition, eutrophication of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, species extinction and loss of biological diversity, deforestation and forest degradation, desertification, soil resource degradation, land-use change, sea level rise, destruction of coastal zones, depletion of fresh water and marine fisheries, loss of wetlands and riparian zones and hazardous waste management. Response options to mitigate these threats or to adapt to changing environs are needed to ensure a sustainable biosphere for all forms of life. To that end, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change provides a forum to encourage the conceptualization, critical examination and debate regarding response options. The aim of this journal is to provide a forum to review, analyze and stimulate the development, testing and implementation of mitigation and adaptation strategies at regional, national and global scales. One of the primary goals of this journal is to contribute to real-time policy analysis and development as national and international policies and agreements are discussed and promulgated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信