Pain distribution can be determined by classical conditioning

Jakub Nastaj, Jacek Skalski, Daria Nowak, Natalia Kruszyna, Przemyslaw Babel, Tibor Szikszay, Kerstin Luedtke, Rafal Gnat, Waclaw M. Adamczyk
{"title":"Pain distribution can be determined by classical conditioning","authors":"Jakub Nastaj, Jacek Skalski, Daria Nowak, Natalia Kruszyna, Przemyslaw Babel, Tibor Szikszay, Kerstin Luedtke, Rafal Gnat, Waclaw M. Adamczyk","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.31.609921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\nChronic widespread pain (CWP) - as many other clinical presentations - manifests in ongoing pain without identifiable structural cause, with pain that spreads over multiple body areas. The development and maintenance of symptoms may involve learning mechanisms. The authors have hypothesized that pain distribution can be learned through classical conditioning or elicited by verbal suggestion. Ninety-four healthy volunteers participated in this study and were randomly distributed to four groups. In the classical conditioning combined with verbal suggestion group, US- (small pain distribution) and US+ (large pain distribution) were paired with visual stimuli (CS+ and CS-) and participants were told about this association. In the verbal suggestion group, the conditioning was not performed, whereas in classical conditioning only group, learning was not combined with suggestion. In the control group, conditioning and suggestion did not take place. Ratings of perceived pain distribution (PD) were collected after each trial and ratings of pain intensity after each block of trials. During the testing phase, participants were exposed to electrocutaneous stimuli corresponding to only the small (US-) pain distribution. Results showed significant differences between CS+ and CS- pain distribution ratings across the experimental groups: conditioning + verbal suggestion (p<0.01), conditioning only group (p<0.05) and verbal suggestion only group (p<0.05), but not in the control group (p>0.05). Furthermore, significant differences in the perceived pain distribution were found between the control group and all experimental groups. This result supports our main hypothesis that the perceived pain distribution can be influenced by classical conditioning as well as verbal suggestion, although the effect is stronger when both are combined. Key words: pain, classical conditioning, pain distribution, spatial aspect of pain, learning mechanism","PeriodicalId":501557,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Physiology","volume":"207 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.31.609921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Chronic widespread pain (CWP) - as many other clinical presentations - manifests in ongoing pain without identifiable structural cause, with pain that spreads over multiple body areas. The development and maintenance of symptoms may involve learning mechanisms. The authors have hypothesized that pain distribution can be learned through classical conditioning or elicited by verbal suggestion. Ninety-four healthy volunteers participated in this study and were randomly distributed to four groups. In the classical conditioning combined with verbal suggestion group, US- (small pain distribution) and US+ (large pain distribution) were paired with visual stimuli (CS+ and CS-) and participants were told about this association. In the verbal suggestion group, the conditioning was not performed, whereas in classical conditioning only group, learning was not combined with suggestion. In the control group, conditioning and suggestion did not take place. Ratings of perceived pain distribution (PD) were collected after each trial and ratings of pain intensity after each block of trials. During the testing phase, participants were exposed to electrocutaneous stimuli corresponding to only the small (US-) pain distribution. Results showed significant differences between CS+ and CS- pain distribution ratings across the experimental groups: conditioning + verbal suggestion (p<0.01), conditioning only group (p<0.05) and verbal suggestion only group (p<0.05), but not in the control group (p>0.05). Furthermore, significant differences in the perceived pain distribution were found between the control group and all experimental groups. This result supports our main hypothesis that the perceived pain distribution can be influenced by classical conditioning as well as verbal suggestion, although the effect is stronger when both are combined. Key words: pain, classical conditioning, pain distribution, spatial aspect of pain, learning mechanism
疼痛分布可由经典条件反射决定
摘要慢性广泛性疼痛(CWP)与许多其他临床表现一样,表现为持续性疼痛,没有可识别的结构性原因,疼痛遍及身体多个部位。症状的发展和维持可能涉及学习机制。作者假设,疼痛的分布可以通过经典条件反射学会,或通过语言暗示诱发。94 名健康志愿者参加了这项研究,并被随机分配到四个小组。在经典条件反射结合语言暗示组中,US-(疼痛分布小)和US+(疼痛分布大)与视觉刺激(CS+和CS-)配对,并告诉参与者这种关联。语言暗示组不进行条件反射,而仅进行经典条件反射组的学习不与暗示相结合。对照组则不进行条件反射和暗示。每次试验后都会收集感知疼痛分布(PD)的评分,每个试验块后都会收集疼痛强度的评分。在测试阶段,参与者受到的电刺激只与小范围(US-)疼痛分布相对应。结果显示,CS+ 和 CS- 疼痛分布评级在各实验组之间存在显著差异:条件反射 + 语言暗示组(p<0.01)、仅条件反射组(p<0.05)和仅语言暗示组(p<0.05),但在对照组中没有差异(p>0.05)。此外,对照组和所有实验组之间在感知疼痛分布方面存在明显差异。这一结果支持了我们的主要假设,即感知到的疼痛分布会受到经典条件反射和言语暗示的影响,但当两者结合时,影响会更大。关键词:疼痛、经典条件反射、疼痛分布、疼痛的空间方面、学习机制
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信