Objective Weights for Scoring: The Automatic Democratic Method

Chris Tofallis
{"title":"Objective Weights for Scoring: The Automatic Democratic Method","authors":"Chris Tofallis","doi":"arxiv-2409.02087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When comparing performance (of products, services, entities, etc.), multiple\nattributes are involved. This paper deals with a way of weighting these\nattributes when one is seeking an overall score. It presents an objective\napproach to generating the weights in a scoring formula which avoids personal\njudgement. The first step is to find the maximum possible score for each\nassessed entity. These upper bound scores are found using Data Envelopment\nAnalysis. In the second step the weights in the scoring formula are found by\nregressing the unique DEA scores on the attribute data. Reasons for using least\nsquares and avoiding other distance measures are given. The method is tested on\ndata where the true scores and weights are known. The method enables the\nconstruction of an objective scoring formula which has been generated from the\ndata arising from all assessed entities and is, in that sense, democratic.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.02087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When comparing performance (of products, services, entities, etc.), multiple attributes are involved. This paper deals with a way of weighting these attributes when one is seeking an overall score. It presents an objective approach to generating the weights in a scoring formula which avoids personal judgement. The first step is to find the maximum possible score for each assessed entity. These upper bound scores are found using Data Envelopment Analysis. In the second step the weights in the scoring formula are found by regressing the unique DEA scores on the attribute data. Reasons for using least squares and avoiding other distance measures are given. The method is tested on data where the true scores and weights are known. The method enables the construction of an objective scoring formula which has been generated from the data arising from all assessed entities and is, in that sense, democratic.
评分的客观权重:自动民主法
在比较(产品、服务、实体等)性能时,会涉及多个属性。本文探讨了在寻求总体得分时如何对这些属性进行加权。它提出了一种在评分公式中生成权重的客观方法,避免了个人判断。第一步是为每个被评估实体找到可能的最高得分。这些上限分数是通过数据包络分析法找到的。第二步,通过对属性数据的独特 DEA 分数进行回归,找到评分公式中的权重。给出了使用最小二乘法而避免使用其他距离测量方法的原因。该方法在已知真实得分和权重的数据上进行了测试。该方法能够构建一个客观的评分公式,该公式由所有被评估实体的数据生成,从这个意义上说是民主的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信