Receiving information on machine learning-based clinical decision support systems in psychiatric services increases staff trust in these systems: A randomized survey experiment

Erik Perfalk, Martin Bernstorff, Andreas Aalkjær Danielsen, Søren Dinesen Østergaard
{"title":"Receiving information on machine learning-based clinical decision support systems in psychiatric services increases staff trust in these systems: A randomized survey experiment","authors":"Erik Perfalk, Martin Bernstorff, Andreas Aalkjær Danielsen, Søren Dinesen Østergaard","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.09.24313303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical decision support systems based on machine learning (ML) models are emerging within psychiatry. To ensure their successful implementation, healthcare staff needs to trust these systems. Here, we investigated if providing staff with basic information about ML-based clinical decision support systems enhances their trust in them. Methods: We conducted a randomised survey experiment among staff in the Psychiatric Services of the Central Denmark Region. The participants were allocated to one of three arms, receiving different types of information: An intervention arm (receiving information on clinical decision-making supported by an ML model); an active control arm (receiving information on standard clinical decision process without ML support); and a blank control arm (no information). Subsequently, participants responded to various questions regarding their trust/distrust in ML-based clinical decision support systems. The effect of the intervention was assessed by pairwise comparisons between all randomization arms on sum scores of trust and distrust. Findings: Among 2,838 invitees, 780 completed the survey experiment. The intervention enhanced trust and diminished distrust in ML-based clinical decision support systems compared with the active control arm (Trust: mean difference= 5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2%; 9%], p-value < 0.001; Distrust: mean difference=-4% [-7%; -1%], p-value = 0.042)) and the blank control arm (Trust: mean difference= 5% [2%; 11%], p-value = 0.003; Distrust: mean difference= -3% [ -6%; -1%], p-value = 0.021). Interpretation: Providing information on ML-based clinical decision support systems in hospital psychiatry may increase healthcare staff trust in such systems.","PeriodicalId":501388,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.09.24313303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical decision support systems based on machine learning (ML) models are emerging within psychiatry. To ensure their successful implementation, healthcare staff needs to trust these systems. Here, we investigated if providing staff with basic information about ML-based clinical decision support systems enhances their trust in them. Methods: We conducted a randomised survey experiment among staff in the Psychiatric Services of the Central Denmark Region. The participants were allocated to one of three arms, receiving different types of information: An intervention arm (receiving information on clinical decision-making supported by an ML model); an active control arm (receiving information on standard clinical decision process without ML support); and a blank control arm (no information). Subsequently, participants responded to various questions regarding their trust/distrust in ML-based clinical decision support systems. The effect of the intervention was assessed by pairwise comparisons between all randomization arms on sum scores of trust and distrust. Findings: Among 2,838 invitees, 780 completed the survey experiment. The intervention enhanced trust and diminished distrust in ML-based clinical decision support systems compared with the active control arm (Trust: mean difference= 5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2%; 9%], p-value < 0.001; Distrust: mean difference=-4% [-7%; -1%], p-value = 0.042)) and the blank control arm (Trust: mean difference= 5% [2%; 11%], p-value = 0.003; Distrust: mean difference= -3% [ -6%; -1%], p-value = 0.021). Interpretation: Providing information on ML-based clinical decision support systems in hospital psychiatry may increase healthcare staff trust in such systems.
在精神科服务中接收有关基于机器学习的临床决策支持系统的信息,可提高员工对这些系统的信任度:随机调查实验
背景:基于机器学习(ML)模型的临床决策支持系统正在精神病学领域兴起。为确保其成功实施,医护人员需要信任这些系统。在此,我们研究了向员工提供有关基于 ML 的临床决策支持系统的基本信息是否会增强他们对这些系统的信任。研究方法我们在丹麦中部地区精神病学服务机构的员工中开展了一项随机调查实验。参与者被分配到三组中的一组,接受不同类型的信息:干预组(接受由 ML 模型支持的临床决策信息);积极对照组(接受无 ML 支持的标准临床决策过程信息);空白对照组(无信息)。随后,参与者回答了有关他们对基于 ML 的临床决策支持系统的信任/不信任的各种问题。通过对所有随机分组的信任和不信任总分进行配对比较,评估了干预的效果。研究结果在 2838 名受邀者中,有 780 人完成了调查实验。与主动对照组相比,干预增强了对基于 ML 的临床决策支持系统的信任,减少了不信任(信任:平均差异= 5% [95% 置信区间 (CI):2%; 9%],P 值为 < 0.001;不信任:平均差异=-4% [-7%;-1%],p 值=0.042))和空白对照组(信任:平均差异=5% [2%;11%],p 值=0.003;不信任:平均差异=-3% [ -6%;-1%],p 值=0.021)。解释在医院精神科提供有关基于 ML 的临床决策支持系统的信息可提高医护人员对此类系统的信任度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信