Causal inference and racial bias in policing: New estimands and the importance of mobility data

Zhuochao Huang, Brenden Beck, Joseph Antonelli
{"title":"Causal inference and racial bias in policing: New estimands and the importance of mobility data","authors":"Zhuochao Huang, Brenden Beck, Joseph Antonelli","doi":"arxiv-2409.08059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studying racial bias in policing is a critically important problem, but one\nthat comes with a number of inherent difficulties due to the nature of the\navailable data. In this manuscript we tackle multiple key issues in the causal\nanalysis of racial bias in policing. First, we formalize race and place\npolicing, the idea that individuals of one race are policed differently when\nthey are in neighborhoods primarily made up of individuals of other races. We\ndevelop an estimand to study this question rigorously, show the assumptions\nnecessary for causal identification, and develop sensitivity analyses to assess\nrobustness to violations of key assumptions. Additionally, we investigate\ndifficulties with existing estimands targeting racial bias in policing. We show\nfor these estimands, and the estimands developed in this manuscript, that\nestimation can benefit from incorporating mobility data into analyses. We apply\nthese ideas to a study in New York City, where we find a large amount of racial\nbias, as well as race and place policing, and that these findings are robust to\nlarge violations of untestable assumptions. We additionally show that mobility\ndata can make substantial impacts on the resulting estimates, suggesting it\nshould be used whenever possible in subsequent studies.","PeriodicalId":501425,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studying racial bias in policing is a critically important problem, but one that comes with a number of inherent difficulties due to the nature of the available data. In this manuscript we tackle multiple key issues in the causal analysis of racial bias in policing. First, we formalize race and place policing, the idea that individuals of one race are policed differently when they are in neighborhoods primarily made up of individuals of other races. We develop an estimand to study this question rigorously, show the assumptions necessary for causal identification, and develop sensitivity analyses to assess robustness to violations of key assumptions. Additionally, we investigate difficulties with existing estimands targeting racial bias in policing. We show for these estimands, and the estimands developed in this manuscript, that estimation can benefit from incorporating mobility data into analyses. We apply these ideas to a study in New York City, where we find a large amount of racial bias, as well as race and place policing, and that these findings are robust to large violations of untestable assumptions. We additionally show that mobility data can make substantial impacts on the resulting estimates, suggesting it should be used whenever possible in subsequent studies.
警务中的因果推断和种族偏见:新的估算值和流动性数据的重要性
研究警务中的种族偏见是一个极其重要的问题,但由于现有数据的性质,这个问题本身就存在许多困难。在本手稿中,我们解决了警务中种族偏见因果分析的多个关键问题。首先,我们正式提出了种族与地方治安的概念,即当一个种族的人身处主要由其他种族的人组成的社区时,他们会受到不同的治安管理。我们开发了一种估算方法来严格研究这个问题,展示了因果识别所需的假设,并开发了敏感性分析来评估违反关键假设时的稳健性。此外,我们还调查了针对警务工作中种族偏见的现有估计指标存在的困难。我们表明,对于这些估计方法以及本手稿中开发的估计方法,将流动性数据纳入分析可使估计工作受益匪浅。我们将这些想法应用于纽约市的一项研究,在这项研究中,我们发现了大量的种族偏见以及种族和地点警务,而且这些发现对于大量违反无法检验的假设的情况是稳健的。此外,我们还表明,流动性数据会对得出的估计结果产生重大影响,因此建议在后续研究中尽可能使用流动性数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信