The Profile of Bacterial Infections in a Burn Unit during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic Period

Corina Musuroi, Silvia-Ioana Musuroi, Luminita Baditoiu, Zorin Crainiceanu, Delia Muntean, Adela Voinescu, Oana Izmendi, Alexandra Sirmon, Monica Licker
{"title":"The Profile of Bacterial Infections in a Burn Unit during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic Period","authors":"Corina Musuroi, Silvia-Ioana Musuroi, Luminita Baditoiu, Zorin Crainiceanu, Delia Muntean, Adela Voinescu, Oana Izmendi, Alexandra Sirmon, Monica Licker","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13090823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Infections represent a major complication for burn-injured patients. The aim of this study was to highlight the changes in the incidence and antimicrobial resistance of bacterial strains isolated from burn patients, at the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, in relation to the antibiotics used during the pandemic. A comparative analysis of the demographic data and the microorganisms identified in the clinical samples of two groups of burn patients admitted to a university hospital in Romania was carried out. The first group consisted of 48 patients and the second of 69 patients, hospitalized in January–August 2020 and 2023, respectively. The bacterial species with the highest incidence were S. aureus, A. baumannii, Pseudomonas spp. The significant changes between 2023 and 2020 are reflected in the increase in the frequency of non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria, especially S. maltophilia, and the increase in antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas and Klebsiella spp. Klebsiella spp. did not change in frequency (7%), but there was a significant increase in the incidence of K. pneumoniae strains with pan-drug resistant behaviour to antibiotics (40%), including colistin. The phenomenon can be explained by the selection of specimens carrying multiple resistance genes, as a result of antibiotic treatment during the COVID-19 period. The post-pandemic antimicrobial resistance detected in burn patients indicates the need for permanent surveillance of the resistance trends, primarily due to the limited therapeutic options available for these patients.","PeriodicalId":8151,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics","volume":"181 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infections represent a major complication for burn-injured patients. The aim of this study was to highlight the changes in the incidence and antimicrobial resistance of bacterial strains isolated from burn patients, at the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, in relation to the antibiotics used during the pandemic. A comparative analysis of the demographic data and the microorganisms identified in the clinical samples of two groups of burn patients admitted to a university hospital in Romania was carried out. The first group consisted of 48 patients and the second of 69 patients, hospitalized in January–August 2020 and 2023, respectively. The bacterial species with the highest incidence were S. aureus, A. baumannii, Pseudomonas spp. The significant changes between 2023 and 2020 are reflected in the increase in the frequency of non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria, especially S. maltophilia, and the increase in antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas and Klebsiella spp. Klebsiella spp. did not change in frequency (7%), but there was a significant increase in the incidence of K. pneumoniae strains with pan-drug resistant behaviour to antibiotics (40%), including colistin. The phenomenon can be explained by the selection of specimens carrying multiple resistance genes, as a result of antibiotic treatment during the COVID-19 period. The post-pandemic antimicrobial resistance detected in burn patients indicates the need for permanent surveillance of the resistance trends, primarily due to the limited therapeutic options available for these patients.
COVID-19 大流行期间和之后烧伤科细菌感染的概况
感染是烧伤患者的主要并发症之一。本研究旨在强调 COVID-19 大流行结束后,从烧伤患者体内分离出的细菌菌株的发病率和抗菌药耐药性的变化与大流行期间使用的抗生素的关系。我们对罗马尼亚一家大学医院收治的两组烧伤患者的人口统计学数据和临床样本中鉴定出的微生物进行了比较分析。第一组有 48 名患者,第二组有 69 名患者,分别于 2020 年 1 月至 8 月和 2023 年 1 月至 8 月住院治疗。发病率最高的细菌种类是金黄色葡萄球菌、鲍曼不动杆菌和假单胞菌属。 2023 年与 2020 年之间的显著变化反映在非发酵革兰氏阴性菌(尤其是嗜麦芽糖酵母菌)的发病率增加,以及嗜麦芽糖酵母菌的发病率增加。克雷伯菌属的频率没有变化(7%),但对抗生素具有泛耐药性的肺炎克雷伯菌株的发生率显著增加(40%),其中包括可乐定。出现这种现象的原因是,在 COVID-19 期间,抗生素治疗选择了携带多重耐药基因的标本。在烧伤患者中检测到的大流行后抗菌药耐药性表明,有必要对耐药性趋势进行长期监测,这主要是因为这些患者可选择的治疗方法有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信