Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy with wire endoscopic simplified technique: Move towards benign indications (with video)

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jean-Michel Gonzalez, Sohaib Ouazzani, Geoffroy Vanbiervliet, Mohamed Gasmi, Marc Barthet
{"title":"Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy with wire endoscopic simplified technique: Move towards benign indications (with video)","authors":"Jean-Michel Gonzalez,&nbsp;Sohaib Ouazzani,&nbsp;Geoffroy Vanbiervliet,&nbsp;Mohamed Gasmi,&nbsp;Marc Barthet","doi":"10.1111/den.14895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) is an alternative to duodenal stenting and surgical GJ (SGGJ) in malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO). European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines restricted EUS-GJ for MGOO only, because of misdeployment. The aim was to evaluate its outcomes focusing on benign indications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective study conducted from 2016 to 2023 in a tertiary center. Patients included had malignant or benign GOO indicated for EUS-GJ. Techniques were the direct approach until August 2021, and the wire endoscopic simplified technique (WEST) afterwards. The main objective was to compare outcomes in benign vs. MGOO. Secondary end-points were technical success, adverse events rates, and describing the evolution of techniques and indications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In all, 87 patients were included, 46 men, mean age 66 ± 16.2 years. Indications were malignant in 60.1% and benign in 39.1%. The EUS-GJ technique was direct in 33 patients (37.9%) and WEST in 54 (62.1%). No difference was found in terms of technical, clinical, or adverse events rates. The initial technical success rate was 88.5%. The final technical and clinical success rates were 96.6% and 94.25%, respectively. In the last year, benign exceeded malignant indications (70.4% vs. 29.6%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). Seven misdeployments occurred, six being addressed with the rescue technique. The misdeployment rate was significantly decreased using the WEST approach compared to the direct one: 3.7% vs. 18% (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). The severe postoperative adverse events rate was 2.3%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrated similar outcomes of EUS-GJ between benign and MGOO, with a decreasing misdeployment rate (&lt;4%) applying WEST. This represents an additional step towards recommending EUS-GJ in benign indications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":159,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"37 2","pages":"167-175"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/den.14895","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.14895","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) is an alternative to duodenal stenting and surgical GJ (SGGJ) in malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO). European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines restricted EUS-GJ for MGOO only, because of misdeployment. The aim was to evaluate its outcomes focusing on benign indications.

Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted from 2016 to 2023 in a tertiary center. Patients included had malignant or benign GOO indicated for EUS-GJ. Techniques were the direct approach until August 2021, and the wire endoscopic simplified technique (WEST) afterwards. The main objective was to compare outcomes in benign vs. MGOO. Secondary end-points were technical success, adverse events rates, and describing the evolution of techniques and indications.

Results

In all, 87 patients were included, 46 men, mean age 66 ± 16.2 years. Indications were malignant in 60.1% and benign in 39.1%. The EUS-GJ technique was direct in 33 patients (37.9%) and WEST in 54 (62.1%). No difference was found in terms of technical, clinical, or adverse events rates. The initial technical success rate was 88.5%. The final technical and clinical success rates were 96.6% and 94.25%, respectively. In the last year, benign exceeded malignant indications (70.4% vs. 29.6%, P < 0.05). Seven misdeployments occurred, six being addressed with the rescue technique. The misdeployment rate was significantly decreased using the WEST approach compared to the direct one: 3.7% vs. 18% (P < 0.05). The severe postoperative adverse events rate was 2.3%.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated similar outcomes of EUS-GJ between benign and MGOO, with a decreasing misdeployment rate (<4%) applying WEST. This represents an additional step towards recommending EUS-GJ in benign indications.

Abstract Image

内窥镜超声引导下的胃空肠吻合术与线内窥镜简化技术:向良性适应症发展(附视频)
目的内镜超声引导下胃空肠吻合术(EUS-GJ)是恶性胃出口梗阻(MGOO)十二指肠支架植入术和外科胃空肠吻合术(SGGJ)的替代方法。欧洲消化内镜学会的指南规定,EUS-GJ 只能用于 MGOO,因为会出现误操作。方法这是一项回顾性研究,于 2016 年至 2023 年在一家三级中心进行。纳入的患者有恶性或良性 GOO,均有 EUS-GJ 适应症。2021年8月前采用直接方法,2021年8月后采用线内镜简化技术(WEST)。主要目的是比较良性与恶性GOO的治疗效果。次要终点是技术成功率、不良事件发生率,以及描述技术和适应症的演变。60.1%的适应症为恶性,39.1%为良性。33例患者(37.9%)采用直接EUS-GJ技术,54例患者(62.1%)采用WEST技术。在技术、临床和不良事件发生率方面没有发现差异。最初的技术成功率为 88.5%。最终的技术和临床成功率分别为 96.6% 和 94.25%。去年,良性适应症超过了恶性适应症(70.4% 对 29.6%,P <0.05)。发生了七次错误部署,其中六次是通过抢救技术解决的。与直接方法相比,WEST方法的误置率明显降低:3.7%对18%(P< 0.05)。结论这项研究表明,良性和 MGOO 的 EUS-GJ 结果相似,采用 WEST 方法的误切率(<4%)有所下降。这表明在良性适应症中推荐使用 EUS-GJ 又迈进了一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Endoscopy
Digestive Endoscopy 医学-外科
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
15.10%
发文量
291
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Digestive Endoscopy (DEN) is the official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, the Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy and the World Endoscopy Organization. Digestive Endoscopy serves as a medium for presenting original articles that offer significant contributions to knowledge in the broad field of endoscopy. The Journal also includes Reviews, Original Articles, How I Do It, Case Reports (only of exceptional interest and novelty are accepted), Letters, Techniques and Images, abstracts and news items that may be of interest to endoscopists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信