Alice V. Cunnington, Peter Shum, Craig S. Wilding, Stefano Mariani
{"title":"Exploring intertidal sea anemones Actinia equina as natural eDNA samplers for coastal biodiversity assessment","authors":"Alice V. Cunnington, Peter Shum, Craig S. Wilding, Stefano Mariani","doi":"10.3354/meps14650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: Biodiversity in coastal marine environments is under unprecedented threat from anthropogenic impacts, which highlights a need for cost-effective and expedient survey methods. The analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA)—typically obtained through artificially filtered water samples—can paint a detailed picture of fish diversity in marine coastal environments. More recently, the analysis of natural sampler DNA (nsDNA, based on filter-feeding invertebrates that naturally trap eDNA in their tissues) has emerged as a potential alternative to water filtering. In this study, we investigate the widely distributed beadlet anemone <i>Actinia equina</i> as a potential natural eDNA sampler. Anemone samples were collected from 2 coastal locations in the UK: Rhosneigr (Anglesey, North Wales) and New Brighton (Wirral, north-western England). Sampling took place over 2 different months, and samples were compared to concomitantly sampled water. DNA metabarcoding via 12S Tele02 fish-specific primers revealed successful detection of a range of fish and other vertebrate species. We observed differences in species detected between conventional eDNA and sea anemone nsDNA samples, as well as a significant difference in seasonality detected through nsDNA. Our results indicate that the beadlet anemone can be a successful natural eDNA sampler, but that its value is more likely to reside in its complementarity alongside established eDNA methods.","PeriodicalId":18193,"journal":{"name":"Marine Ecology Progress Series","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Ecology Progress Series","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3354/meps14650","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Biodiversity in coastal marine environments is under unprecedented threat from anthropogenic impacts, which highlights a need for cost-effective and expedient survey methods. The analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA)—typically obtained through artificially filtered water samples—can paint a detailed picture of fish diversity in marine coastal environments. More recently, the analysis of natural sampler DNA (nsDNA, based on filter-feeding invertebrates that naturally trap eDNA in their tissues) has emerged as a potential alternative to water filtering. In this study, we investigate the widely distributed beadlet anemone Actinia equina as a potential natural eDNA sampler. Anemone samples were collected from 2 coastal locations in the UK: Rhosneigr (Anglesey, North Wales) and New Brighton (Wirral, north-western England). Sampling took place over 2 different months, and samples were compared to concomitantly sampled water. DNA metabarcoding via 12S Tele02 fish-specific primers revealed successful detection of a range of fish and other vertebrate species. We observed differences in species detected between conventional eDNA and sea anemone nsDNA samples, as well as a significant difference in seasonality detected through nsDNA. Our results indicate that the beadlet anemone can be a successful natural eDNA sampler, but that its value is more likely to reside in its complementarity alongside established eDNA methods.
期刊介绍:
The leading journal in its field, MEPS covers all aspects of marine ecology, fundamental and applied. Topics covered include microbiology, botany, zoology, ecosystem research, biological oceanography, ecological aspects of fisheries and aquaculture, pollution, environmental protection, conservation, and resource management.