The Efficacy of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Developing Science Education Preservice Teachers’ Writing Skills: An Experimental Approach

IF 3.3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
ZanPeng Li, Chinaza Solomon Ironsi
{"title":"The Efficacy of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Developing Science Education Preservice Teachers’ Writing Skills: An Experimental Approach","authors":"ZanPeng Li, Chinaza Solomon Ironsi","doi":"10.1007/s10956-024-10148-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Given the continued debates sparked by recent technology innovation around generative artificial intelligence and the varied findings on its use for productive learning, this paper addresses the efficacy of ChatGPT from a preservice teachers’ perspective and science education viewpoint. This study adopted a mixed-method research design with an experimental approach for methodology. For data collection, post-tests and interviews were used to elicit information from the participants on the efficacy of ChatGPT in improving their writing skills and their opinions on its efficacy for learning. The paper revealed that ChatGPT might not significantly improve preservice teachers' writing skills. While this may be contextual, our findings provide valuable insights into pedagogical strategies for resisting techno-deterministic framings of present-day learning. This study contributes to the corpus of studies in the scientific literature on the efficacy of ChatGPT in improving student achievement. Besides, it unpacks pedagogical strategies that may be applied to improving students' writing skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":50057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science Education and Technology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science Education and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10148-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the continued debates sparked by recent technology innovation around generative artificial intelligence and the varied findings on its use for productive learning, this paper addresses the efficacy of ChatGPT from a preservice teachers’ perspective and science education viewpoint. This study adopted a mixed-method research design with an experimental approach for methodology. For data collection, post-tests and interviews were used to elicit information from the participants on the efficacy of ChatGPT in improving their writing skills and their opinions on its efficacy for learning. The paper revealed that ChatGPT might not significantly improve preservice teachers' writing skills. While this may be contextual, our findings provide valuable insights into pedagogical strategies for resisting techno-deterministic framings of present-day learning. This study contributes to the corpus of studies in the scientific literature on the efficacy of ChatGPT in improving student achievement. Besides, it unpacks pedagogical strategies that may be applied to improving students' writing skills.

Abstract Image

生成式人工智能在培养科学教育在职教师写作能力方面的功效:实验方法
鉴于最近围绕生成式人工智能的技术革新引发了持续的争论,以及关于其在生产性学习中的应用的各种研究结果,本文从职前教师的角度和科学教育的角度探讨了 ChatGPT 的功效。本研究采用了混合方法研究设计,并在方法论上采用了实验方法。在数据收集方面,采用了后测和访谈的方法,向参与者了解 ChatGPT 在提高写作能力方面的功效,以及他们对 ChatGPT 的学习功效的看法。论文显示,ChatGPT 对职前教师写作能力的提高可能并不明显。虽然这可能与具体情况有关,但我们的研究结果为抵制当今学习的技术决定论框架的教学策略提供了有价值的见解。本研究为科学文献中有关 ChatGPT 在提高学生成绩方面的功效的大量研究做出了贡献。此外,它还揭示了可用于提高学生写作能力的教学策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Journal of Science Education and Technology EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Science Education and Technology is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of original peer-reviewed, contributed and invited research articles of the highest quality that address the intersection of science education and technology with implications for improving and enhancing science education at all levels across the world. Topics covered can be categorized as disciplinary (biology, chemistry, physics, as well as some applications of computer science and engineering, including the processes of learning, teaching and teacher development), technological (hardware, software, deigned and situated environments involving applications characterized as with, through and in), and organizational (legislation, administration, implementation and teacher enhancement). Insofar as technology plays an ever-increasing role in our understanding and development of science disciplines, in the social relationships among people, information and institutions, the journal includes it as a component of science education. The journal provides a stimulating and informative variety of research papers that expand and deepen our theoretical understanding while providing practice and policy based implications in the anticipation that such high-quality work shared among a broad coalition of individuals and groups will facilitate future efforts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信